Carboplatin chemical structure
Find information on thousands of medical conditions and prescription drugs.

Carboplatin

Carboplatin is a chemotherapy drug used against some form of cancer. It was introduced in the late 1980s and has since gained popularity in clinical treatment due to its vastly reduced side-effects compared to its parent compound cisplatin. Cisplatin and carboplatin, as well as oxaliplatin, are classified as DNA alkylating agents. more...

Home
Diseases
Medicines
A
B
C
Cabergoline
Caduet
Cafergot
Caffeine
Calan
Calciparine
Calcitonin
Calcitriol
Calcium folinate
Campath
Camptosar
Camptosar
Cancidas
Candesartan
Cannabinol
Capecitabine
Capoten
Captohexal
Captopril
Carbachol
Carbadox
Carbamazepine
Carbatrol
Carbenicillin
Carbidopa
Carbimazole
Carboplatin
Cardinorm
Cardiolite
Cardizem
Cardura
Carfentanil
Carisoprodol
Carnitine
Carvedilol
Casodex
Cataflam
Catapres
Cathine
Cathinone
Caverject
Ceclor
Cefacetrile
Cefaclor
Cefaclor
Cefadroxil
Cefazolin
Cefepime
Cefixime
Cefotan
Cefotaxime
Cefotetan
Cefpodoxime
Cefprozil
Ceftazidime
Ceftriaxone
Ceftriaxone
Cefuroxime
Cefuroxime
Cefzil
Celebrex
Celexa
Cellcept
Cephalexin
Cerebyx
Cerivastatin
Cerumenex
Cetirizine
Cetrimide
Chenodeoxycholic acid
Chloralose
Chlorambucil
Chloramphenicol
Chlordiazepoxide
Chlorhexidine
Chloropyramine
Chloroquine
Chloroxylenol
Chlorphenamine
Chlorpromazine
Chlorpropamide
Chlorprothixene
Chlortalidone
Chlortetracycline
Cholac
Cholybar
Choriogonadotropin alfa
Chorionic gonadotropin
Chymotrypsin
Cialis
Ciclopirox
Cicloral
Ciclosporin
Cidofovir
Ciglitazone
Cilastatin
Cilostazol
Cimehexal
Cimetidine
Cinchophen
Cinnarizine
Cipro
Ciprofloxacin
Cisapride
Cisplatin
Citalopram
Citicoline
Cladribine
Clamoxyquine
Clarinex
Clarithromycin
Claritin
Clavulanic acid
Clemastine
Clenbuterol
Climara
Clindamycin
Clioquinol
Clobazam
Clobetasol
Clofazimine
Clomhexal
Clomid
Clomifene
Clomipramine
Clonazepam
Clonidine
Clopidogrel
Clotrimazole
Cloxacillin
Clozapine
Clozaril
Cocarboxylase
Cogentin
Colistin
Colyte
Combivent
Commit
Compazine
Concerta
Copaxone
Cordarone
Coreg
Corgard
Corticotropin
Cortisone
Cotinine
Cotrim
Coumadin
Cozaar
Crestor
Crospovidone
Cuprimine
Cyanocobalamin
Cyclessa
Cyclizine
Cyclobenzaprine
Cyclopentolate
Cyclophosphamide
Cyclopropane
Cylert
Cyproterone
Cystagon
Cysteine
Cytarabine
Cytotec
Cytovene
Isotretinoin
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z

History

Bristol-Myers Squibb gained FDA approval for carboplatin, under the brand name Paraplatin, in March 1989. The drug went generic in October 2004.

Suppliers

Bristol-Myers Squibb continues to market Paraplatin. There are also generic versions of the drug available from APP, Bedford, Sicor, Mayne Pharma, Pharmachemie, Pliva, Sandoz, Spectrum.

Pharmacology

Chemistry

Carboplatin differs from cisplatin in that it has a closed cyclobutane dicarboxylate (CBDCA) moiety on its leaving arm in contrast to the readily leaving chloro groups. This results in very different DNA binding kinetics, though it forms the same reaction products in vitro at equivalent doses with cisplatin. However, recent studies provide a new caveat on the DNA binding molecular mechanisms with the possibility of being activated by nucleophiles (as opposed to cisplatin), before forming the toxic adducts. There are also results to show that cisplatin and carboplatin cause different morphological changes in MCF-7 cell lines while exerting their cytotoxic behaviour.

Mode of action

Two theories exist to explain the molecular mechanism of action of carboplatin with DNA.

  • Aquation, or the like-cisplatin hypothesis.
  • Activation, or the unlike-cisplatin hypothesis.

The former is more accepted owing to the similarity of the leaving groups with its predecessor cisplatin, while the latter hypothesis envisages a biologically activation mechanism to release the active Pt2+ species.

Side-effects

The largest benefit of using carboplatin over cisplatin is the reduction of side effects; particularly the elimination of cisplatin's nephrotoxic effects. This is due in part to the added stability of carboplatin in the bloodstream, which prevents proteins from binding to it. This in turn reduces the amount of these protein-carboplatin complexes to be excreted. The lower excretion rate of carboplatin means that more is retained in the body, and hence its effects are longer lasting (a retention half-life of 30 hours for carboplatin, compared to 1.5-3.6 hours in the case of cisplatin).

There are no known ototoxic effects from carboplatin. Nausea and vomiting are less severe and more easily controlled, compared to the incessant vomiting and antiperistalsis that some patients using cisplatin may experience. Carboplatin has also proven effective in some strains of cancer that may not be susceptible to cisplatin, including germ-line cell, small and non-small cell lung, ovary, and bladder cancers, as well as acute leukemia.

The main drawback of carboplatin is its myelosuppressive effects. This causes the blood cell and platelet output of bone marrow in the body to decrease quite dramatically, sometimes as low as 10% of its usual production levels. The nadir of this myelosuppression usually occurs 21-28 days after the first treatment, after which the blood cell and platelet levels in the blood begin to stabilize, often coming close to its pre-carboplatin levels. This decrease in white blood cells (neutropenia) causes many complications, most notably infection by opportunistic organisms. This necessitates readmission to hospital and treatment with antibiotics.

Read more at Wikipedia.org


[List your site here Free!]


Bronchogenic carcinoma in a 32-year-old with a history of pulmonary langerhans cell histiocytosis
From CHEST, 10/1/05 by Bradley R. Harold

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary nodules are a typical radiographic finding in patients with pulmonary Langerhans' cell histiocytosis (PLCH). Langerhans' cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare disorder that is characterized by an uncontrolled accumulation of Langerhans' cells in various organs. In addition to pulmonary complications, there does appear to be an association with an increased risk of developing malignant neoplasms. We present a case of a patient with PLCH with typical radiographic findings who subsequently developed metastatic bronchogenic carcinoma originating in an area with nodules presumed to be secondary to PLCH.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 32 year old white male was initially diagnosed with LCH at age 4. He had several episodes of recurrent bony involvement, which were treated with a combination of surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. At age 30, the patient presented with dyspnea. Pulmonary involvement of his LCH was suspected, with typical CT findings of nodules and upper lobe predominant cystic lesions. The patient also had an obstructive pattern on pulmonary function studies. He entered into a smoking cessation program and was able to reduce his use but was unable to quit. His pulmonary symptoms and lung function did stabilize without further interventions. He presented two years later with headaches and increasing dyspnea. A brain MRI was performed that revealed multiple ring enhancing lesions. A chest x-ray and CT were obtained that showed a 3x4 cm left lower lobe mass. Tissue obtained by CT-guided fine needle aspiration showed a well differentiated adenocarcinoma consistent with a primary lung cancer. The patient began brain irradiation and palliative chemotherapy with taxol and carboplatin.

DISCUSSIONS: Pulmonary nodules are typical findings in PLCH that have been associated with early disease. Over time the nodules may cavitate and result in thin-walled cavities that are often described in PLCH. These nodules, however, may represent a diagnostic dilemma. Though in most cases these nodules will represent the usual radiographic findings of PLCH, malignant lesions cannot be entirely excluded. There is a clear association with LCH and malignancy. Lymphoma and leukemia are most frequently seen, but solid organ malignancy, particularly lung cancer, has been reported. It appears that between 5 and 14% of patients with pulmonary Langerhans' cell histiocytosis will be diagnosed with lung cancer. (1,2,3) There appears to be an increased tendency for malignancy in all forms of LCH. Cumulative tobacco exposure and previous chemotherapy and radiation therapy confer additional risk of developing cancer. These factors suggest that more aggressive cancer screening may be warranted in patients with LCH. This case is noteworthy because the lung cancer occurred in an area of a nodule seen on the initial CT scan. Though pulmonary nodules are commonly seen in radiology studies in PLCH, this case suggests that these nodules may need to be followed closely by serial CT scans and may require histologic confirmation. The overall approach to appropriate surveillance for lung cancer in these patients needs further elucidation.

CONCLUSION: Lung cancer screening is an essential component to the long-term management of patients with PLCH.

REFERENCES:

(1) Sadoun D, Vaylet F, Valeyre D, et al. Bronchogenic Carcinoma in Patients with Pulmonary Histiocytosis X. Chest 1992; 101:1610-1613

(2) Tomashefski JF, Khiyami A, Kleinerman J. Neoplasms Associated with Pulmonary Eosinophilic Granuloma. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 1991; 115:499-506

(3) Vassallo R, Ryu JH, Schroeder DR, et al. Clinical Outcomes of Pulmonary Langerhans'-Cell Histiocytosis in Adults. New England Journal of Medicine 2002; 346:484-490

DISCLOSURE: Bradley Harrold, None.

Bradley R. Harrold MD * Maria R. Lucarelli MD The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH

COPYRIGHT 2005 American College of Chest Physicians
COPYRIGHT 2005 Gale Group

Return to Carboplatin
Home Contact Resources Exchange Links ebay