Carboplatin chemical structure
Find information on thousands of medical conditions and prescription drugs.

Carboplatin

Carboplatin is a chemotherapy drug used against some form of cancer. It was introduced in the late 1980s and has since gained popularity in clinical treatment due to its vastly reduced side-effects compared to its parent compound cisplatin. Cisplatin and carboplatin, as well as oxaliplatin, are classified as DNA alkylating agents. more...

Home
Diseases
Medicines
A
B
C
Cabergoline
Caduet
Cafergot
Caffeine
Calan
Calciparine
Calcitonin
Calcitriol
Calcium folinate
Campath
Camptosar
Camptosar
Cancidas
Candesartan
Cannabinol
Capecitabine
Capoten
Captohexal
Captopril
Carbachol
Carbadox
Carbamazepine
Carbatrol
Carbenicillin
Carbidopa
Carbimazole
Carboplatin
Cardinorm
Cardiolite
Cardizem
Cardura
Carfentanil
Carisoprodol
Carnitine
Carvedilol
Casodex
Cataflam
Catapres
Cathine
Cathinone
Caverject
Ceclor
Cefacetrile
Cefaclor
Cefaclor
Cefadroxil
Cefazolin
Cefepime
Cefixime
Cefotan
Cefotaxime
Cefotetan
Cefpodoxime
Cefprozil
Ceftazidime
Ceftriaxone
Ceftriaxone
Cefuroxime
Cefuroxime
Cefzil
Celebrex
Celexa
Cellcept
Cephalexin
Cerebyx
Cerivastatin
Cerumenex
Cetirizine
Cetrimide
Chenodeoxycholic acid
Chloralose
Chlorambucil
Chloramphenicol
Chlordiazepoxide
Chlorhexidine
Chloropyramine
Chloroquine
Chloroxylenol
Chlorphenamine
Chlorpromazine
Chlorpropamide
Chlorprothixene
Chlortalidone
Chlortetracycline
Cholac
Cholybar
Choriogonadotropin alfa
Chorionic gonadotropin
Chymotrypsin
Cialis
Ciclopirox
Cicloral
Ciclosporin
Cidofovir
Ciglitazone
Cilastatin
Cilostazol
Cimehexal
Cimetidine
Cinchophen
Cinnarizine
Cipro
Ciprofloxacin
Cisapride
Cisplatin
Citalopram
Citicoline
Cladribine
Clamoxyquine
Clarinex
Clarithromycin
Claritin
Clavulanic acid
Clemastine
Clenbuterol
Climara
Clindamycin
Clioquinol
Clobazam
Clobetasol
Clofazimine
Clomhexal
Clomid
Clomifene
Clomipramine
Clonazepam
Clonidine
Clopidogrel
Clotrimazole
Cloxacillin
Clozapine
Clozaril
Cocarboxylase
Cogentin
Colistin
Colyte
Combivent
Commit
Compazine
Concerta
Copaxone
Cordarone
Coreg
Corgard
Corticotropin
Cortisone
Cotinine
Cotrim
Coumadin
Cozaar
Crestor
Crospovidone
Cuprimine
Cyanocobalamin
Cyclessa
Cyclizine
Cyclobenzaprine
Cyclopentolate
Cyclophosphamide
Cyclopropane
Cylert
Cyproterone
Cystagon
Cysteine
Cytarabine
Cytotec
Cytovene
Isotretinoin
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z

History

Bristol-Myers Squibb gained FDA approval for carboplatin, under the brand name Paraplatin, in March 1989. The drug went generic in October 2004.

Suppliers

Bristol-Myers Squibb continues to market Paraplatin. There are also generic versions of the drug available from APP, Bedford, Sicor, Mayne Pharma, Pharmachemie, Pliva, Sandoz, Spectrum.

Pharmacology

Chemistry

Carboplatin differs from cisplatin in that it has a closed cyclobutane dicarboxylate (CBDCA) moiety on its leaving arm in contrast to the readily leaving chloro groups. This results in very different DNA binding kinetics, though it forms the same reaction products in vitro at equivalent doses with cisplatin. However, recent studies provide a new caveat on the DNA binding molecular mechanisms with the possibility of being activated by nucleophiles (as opposed to cisplatin), before forming the toxic adducts. There are also results to show that cisplatin and carboplatin cause different morphological changes in MCF-7 cell lines while exerting their cytotoxic behaviour.

Mode of action

Two theories exist to explain the molecular mechanism of action of carboplatin with DNA.

  • Aquation, or the like-cisplatin hypothesis.
  • Activation, or the unlike-cisplatin hypothesis.

The former is more accepted owing to the similarity of the leaving groups with its predecessor cisplatin, while the latter hypothesis envisages a biologically activation mechanism to release the active Pt2+ species.

Side-effects

The largest benefit of using carboplatin over cisplatin is the reduction of side effects; particularly the elimination of cisplatin's nephrotoxic effects. This is due in part to the added stability of carboplatin in the bloodstream, which prevents proteins from binding to it. This in turn reduces the amount of these protein-carboplatin complexes to be excreted. The lower excretion rate of carboplatin means that more is retained in the body, and hence its effects are longer lasting (a retention half-life of 30 hours for carboplatin, compared to 1.5-3.6 hours in the case of cisplatin).

There are no known ototoxic effects from carboplatin. Nausea and vomiting are less severe and more easily controlled, compared to the incessant vomiting and antiperistalsis that some patients using cisplatin may experience. Carboplatin has also proven effective in some strains of cancer that may not be susceptible to cisplatin, including germ-line cell, small and non-small cell lung, ovary, and bladder cancers, as well as acute leukemia.

The main drawback of carboplatin is its myelosuppressive effects. This causes the blood cell and platelet output of bone marrow in the body to decrease quite dramatically, sometimes as low as 10% of its usual production levels. The nadir of this myelosuppression usually occurs 21-28 days after the first treatment, after which the blood cell and platelet levels in the blood begin to stabilize, often coming close to its pre-carboplatin levels. This decrease in white blood cells (neutropenia) causes many complications, most notably infection by opportunistic organisms. This necessitates readmission to hospital and treatment with antibiotics.

Read more at Wikipedia.org


[List your site here Free!]


Positron emission tomography demonstrates radiation-induced changes to nonirradiated lungs in lung cancer patients treated with radiation and chemotherapy
From CHEST, 9/1/05 by Hesham A. Hassaballa

Study objectives: To determine whether acute changes in shielded lungs can be detected by positron emission tomography (PET) after radiation therapy.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: University-affiliated medical center.

Patients: Sixteen patients undergoing radiation therapy for lung cancer who had PET scans after receiving treatment.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and results: Thirteen of 16 patients (81.2%) showed increased [sup.18]fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose uptake in shielded nonirradiated lung in the following four distinct patterns: (1) contralateral peripheral pleural uptake in 5 of 16 patients (31.2%); (2) ipsilateral peripheral pleural uptake in 5 of 16 patients (31.2%); (3) bilateral peripheral pleural uptake in 1 of 16 patients (6.2%); and (4) bilateral diffuse background uptake in 1 of 16 patients (6.2%). This last patient developed clinically evident radiation pneumonitis.

Conclusions: Increased lung metabolic activity can be demonstrated in the nonirradiated lung in patients who have undergone radiation therapy for lung cancer and can be detected by PET scanning. PET scanning of lungs in irradiated patients may provide an early demonstrable barometer of pulmonary toxicity. If verified, this imaging tool could prove to be useful in monitoring patients receiving radiation therapy for thoracic malignancies and may have predictive value for subsequent fibrosis. PET scanning may also be an important tool in future studies to further elucidate the pathogenetic mechanism of radiation-induced lung injury.

Key words: lung cancer; positron emission tomography scanning; pulmonary toxicity; radiation pneumonitis; radiation therapy

Abbreviations: FDG = [sup.18]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose; PET = positron emission tomography; RT = radiation therapy

**********

External beam ionizing radiation therapy (RT) has become a mainstay of treatment for neoplasms of many organs, including the lungs. (1) Although RT benefits patients with lung cancer, exposure to RT is not without risks. RT is particularly toxic to the lungs, and it has the potential to cause fatal pneumonitis and/or fibrosis. The lungs are the major dose-limiting organs for radiation of thoracic neoplasms. (2,3) The pathogenesis of radiation-induced injury to the lungs is well-understood (2,4-6) and therapies to attenuate the pulmonary toxicity are under exploration. (4,5) However, symptomatic pnuemonitis because of irradiation does not predict fibrosis, and tolerance of irradiation early in therapy does not predict the development of symptomatic pneumonitis. It is, therefore, suspected that the recognition of subclinical events, such as limited alveolitis mediated by inflammatory cells and cytokines, are important toward the treatment of pneumotoxicity.

The prompt diagnosis of radiation-induced lung injury may lead to the successful treatment of this complication of RT. Diagnostic imaging techniques have the potential to make early diagnosis of radiation-induced lung injury feasible. (7,8) One example is [sup.18]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). FDG-PET is most often applied in the diagnosis and staging of cancer (9) but has also been found to be useful in the characterization of nonmalignant diseases. (10,11) FDG-PET is an imaging modality that detects the increased uptake of glucose in areas of increased cell metabolism. The patients are injected with glucose molecules labeled with FDG. FDG uptake and concentration causes local positron emission at these sites. These positrons are instantly annihilated, producing two coplanar 511 keV photons emitted in opposite directions. These coincident and spatially opposite events are registered and imaged with a camera that can then localize the areas of increased uptake. In malignancy, the increased uptake/metabolism reflects increases in cell proliferation, blood flow, and inflammation. To determine whether increased metabolic activity occurs in nonirradiated and shielded lungs, FDG-PET was conducted before and after RT was localized to the tumor bed with shielding of the uninvolved areas. We performed a retrospective review of 16 patients with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of primary lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective review of 16 patients with biopsy-proven lung cancer. Three of the 16 patients (18.8%) had small cell lung cancer. Each patient received combinations of chemotherapy, RT, and surgical resection and/or biopsy between 1995 and 1999. Patients with small cell lung cancer received VP16 therapy, and patients with non-small cell lung cancer received paclitaxel and carboplatin therapy. Thoracic RT fields were designed to include the primary tumor volume and nodal groups that were at risk for regional recurrence. The initial fields were opposed anterior-posterior beam arrangements. Patients received 4,000 cGy with these initial fields. The subsequent fields were oblique and designed to exclude the spinal cord. Custom blocks were designed, fabricated, and used during all phases of the BT to minimize the normal tissue irradiation. RT was delivered concurrently with chemotherapy in a split-course schedule to minimize the toxicity. The patients received 8 consecutive days off, treatment (excluding weekends), and then had 7 weekdays of representing one 21-day cycle of therapy. RT started on day 1 of chemotherapy and concluded on day 93. FDG-PET scans were done before and after the radiation and chemotherapy. The patients were injected with FDG in doses between 8 and 15 mCi, and 45 to 60 min after the injection, imaging with a scanner (ECAT EXACT Scanner; Siemens; Munich, Germany) was performed. Scans were interpreted by a nuclear medicine physician, the nuclear medicine expert in our institution with > 25 years of experience, who was blinded to the clinical status of the patients.

RESULTS

Following irradiation, there was tumor shrinkage in all 16 patients. In addition, 13 of 16 patients (81.2%) showed increased FDG uptake in the shielded nonirradiated lung. The pleural uptake seen in the patients exceeded the surrounding lung "background" activity by 20 to 30%. The following four patterns were recognized: (1) contralateral peripheral pleural uptake in 5 of 16 patients (31.2%); (2) ipsilateral peripheral pleural uptake in 5 of 16 patients (31.2%) [Fig 1]; (3) bilateral peripheral pleural uptake in 1 of 16 patients (6.2%) [Fig 2]; (4) bilateral diffuse background uptake in 1 of 16 (6.2%). Three patients (18.8%) showed no increased uptake in nonirradiated lung. Only one patient (6.2%) developed clinically evident radiation pneumonitis, and this patient showed bilateral diffuse uptake of FDG. The initial PET scans did not show pleural uptake.

[FIGURES 1-2 OMITTED]

DISCUSSION

In 13 of the 16 patients reviewed for this study, there was increased FDG uptake after RT for lung cancer. Five patients had increased uptake in the nonirradiated lung, which was similar to the findings of previous studies. (12,13) In 12 patients, these findings occurred despite the absence of a clinically evident syndrome of radiation pneumonitis. It is possible that a lymphocytic alveolitis occurred in those patients as described below. In the one patient who developed radiation pneumonitis, there was bilateral diffuse uptake on the posttreatment PET scan, including moderately increased uptake in the right lower lobe, corresponding to the field of radiation treatment, and this finding is again similar to previous reports. (14) Our findings differ, however, in that the pattern of uptake in all but 1 of the 13 patients was peripheral in nature. This may indicate the presence of pleuritis, and our findings suggest that radiation-induced injury to the lung may start at the pleura. Indeed, this has been described in animal models of radiation-induced lung fibrosis. (15)

Radiation-induced lung injury was first described as early as 1922, (16) and the topic has been extensively reviewed in the literature. (2,17-22) Classically, radiation-induced lung injury occurs in two distinct phases: pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis. The phase of pneumonitis is characterized by the loss of type I pneumocytes, increased capillary permeability, interstitial edema, alveolar capillary congestion, and inflammatory cell accumulation in the alveolar space. (2,3) These changes are dose-dependent, and they appear above a certain threshold level of radiation exposure. Pulmonary fibrosis is the repair process that follows the pneumonitis stage, and its underlying mechanism, extent, and time to development are still poorly understood (2,3) and not obviously related to the earlier development of pneumonitis. Research (2,4-6) has elucidated the role of a whole host of cytokines and tissue growth factors that are believed to be involved in the development of radiation-induced lung injury, including platelet-derived growth factor and transforming growth factor-[beta].

The clinical presentation of radiation-induced lung injury is extremely variable, usually developing between 2 and 6 months following the completion of RT. The initial syndrome is characterized by the insidious onset of cough and dyspnea on exertion, which can progress rapidly to severe shortness of breath at rest. A low-grade fever is common, and it may be high in severe cases. In addition, chest fullness and pleuritic chest pain may also be present. (2) The findings of a physical examination are usually normal, but crackles and/or pleural friction rub may also be heard. In severe cases, patients may show signs of tachypnea, cyanosis, and signs of acute cor pulmonale. Radiation pneumonitis can resolve spontaneously or can progress to acute hypoxic respiratory failure, which can be fatal. (2)

Most often, pneumonitis occurs in the field of radiation treatment, but bilateral radiation pneumonitis has been reported to occur after unilateral RT, (23-28) and the reason for this is still not very well-understood. (2) Gibson et al (12) studied four patients who developed radiation pneumonitis after unilateral thoracic irradiation for breast cancer, and they found an increase in the total number of cells recovered from lavage fluid in both the irradiated and unirradiated lungs. This suggested that the underlying mechanism of radiation pneumonitis is similar to that of hypersensitivity pneumonitis. (29) Roberts et al (13) then performed a prospective study on women receiving RT for carcinoma of the breast who were evaluated before treatment and 4 to 6 weeks after treatment. A medical history was taken, and a physical examination, chest radiograph, quantitative gallium lung scan, respiratory function tests, and BAL were performed in these patients. They found that the patients with clinical pneumonitis developed bilateral severe lymphocytic alveolitis and bilateral increased gallium uptake, despite strict unilateral thoracic irradiation. In addition, they found (13) that the same process occurred in asymptomatic patients without clinical pneumonitis, although the reaction was less intense in nature. The results of their second study gave additional weight to their previous suggestion (12) that radiation pneumonitis may be a hypersensitivity reaction. (13) Arbetter et al (30) reported on radiation-induced organizing pneumonitis occurring outside the direct radiation field in six patients who received RT for breast cancer. Two patients had lymphocytosis found on their BAL sample, and five patients had bronchiolitis obliterans-organizing pneumonia found on lung biopsy samples. As a result, they also suggested (30) that radiation pneumonitis may be attributable to an immunologically mediated lymphocytic alveolitis. More recently, Fujita et al (31) reported two cases of bilateral radiation pneumonitis with unilateral thoracic irradiation for lung cancer. Histologically, both patients had diffuse "alveolar damage, and they found antibodies against cytokeratins 8, 18, and 19 in the patients' sera, suggesting the possibility that autoantibodies may also play a role in the development of bilateral radiation pneumonitis.

The imaging modalities that are most often used in the diagnosis of radiation-induced lung injury are chest radiography and CT scanning. (3,7,8,30) Other imaging modalities, however, have also been used, including ventilation/perfusion scanning, (8) single photon emission CT scanning, (8) and gallium scanning. (13,27,32,33) As mentioned previously, PET scanning utilizes glucose molecules that are labeled with radioactive fluorine to detect areas of increased metabolic activity, where glucose would be preferentially taken up. The intense uptake of glucose occurs in areas with increased metabolic activity, including areas of inflammation and accelerated cell growth, such as that in malignant tumors. PET scanning, however, has also been shown to be useful in the diagnosis of nonmalignant conditions, (10,11) including radiation pneumonitis. Lin et al (14) published a case of a patient with inoperable lung cancer who underwent a radical course of RT and chemotherapy. One month after the completion of RT, the patient developed progressive dyspnea and dry cough. Chest radiographs showed bilateral interstitial infiltrates, particularly in the left lung. An FDG-PET scan was performed as part of a research protocol, and it showed moderate diffusely increased FDG uptake in the left lung, with a sharp demarcation between the upper one third and lower two thirds, corresponding with the RT fields. The patient experienced prompt improvement after prednisone therapy was initiated. (14)

The results described herein expand on those published by Lin et al (14) and demonstrate various patterns of increased lung metabolic activity in the nonirradiated lung. It is suspected that these findings demonstrate a subclinical pneumonitis, and, thus, PET scanning of the lungs in irradiated patients may provide an early demonstrable barometer of pulmonary toxicity. It must be noted, however, that increased uptake during PET scanning is not specific, because it is expected that any area of increased metabolic activity would be detected by PET scanning. Indeed, PET has been shown, (10,11) to be useful in the diagnosis of nonmalignant disorders, as mentioned previously. Therefore, additional prospective studies need to be conducted to verify the findings of our study. If verified, this imaging tool could prove to be useful in monitoring the patients who are receiving RT for thoracic malignancies and who may have predictive value for subsequent fibrosis.

REFERENCES

(1) Lichter AS. Radiation therapy. In: Abeloff MD, ed. Clinical oncology, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone, 2000; 423-464

(2) Morgan GW, Breit SN. Radiation and the lung: a reevaluation of the mechanisms mediating pulmonary injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 31:361-369

(3) Rosiello RA, Merrill WW. Radiation-induced lung injury. Clin Chest Med 1990; 11:65-71

(4) Huber PE, Gong P, Plathow C, et al. Potential signaling and attenuation of radiation-induced lung fibrosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003; 57(suppl):S160

(5) Yi ES, Bedoya A, Lee H, et al. Radiation-induced lung injury in vivo: expression of transforming growth factor-[beta] precedes fibrosis. Inflammation 1996; 20:339-352

(6) Adamson IY, Bowden DH. Endothelial injury and repair in radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Pathol 1983; 112:224-230

(7) Taylor CR. Diagnostic imaging techniques in the evaluation of drug-induced pulmonary disease. Clin Chest Med 1990; 11:87-94

(8) Bell J, McGivern D, Bullimor J, et al. Diagnostic imaging of post-irradiation changes in the chest. Clin Radiol 1988; 39:109-119

(9) Chiti A, Schreiner FA, Crippa F, et al. Nuclear medicine procedures in lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med 1999; 26:533-555

(10) Alavi A, Gupta N, Alberini JL, et al. Positron emission tomography imaging in nonmalignant thoracic disorders. Semin Nucl Med 2002; 32:293-321

(11) Wollmer P, Rhodes CG. Positron emission tomography in pulmonary edema. J Thorac Imaging 1988; 3:44-50

(12) Gibson PG, Bryant DH, Morgan GW, et al. Radiation-induced lung injury: a hypersensitivity pneumonitis? Ann Intern Med 1988; 109:288-291

(13) Roberts CM, Foulcher E, Zaunders JJ, et al. Radiation pneumonitis: a possible lymphocyte-mediated hypersensitivity reaction. Ann Intern Meal 1993; 118:696-700

(14) Lin P, Delaney G, Chu J, et al. Fluorine-18 FDG dual-head gamma camera coincidence imaging of radiation pneumonitis. Clin Nucl Med 2000; 25:866-869

(15) Ward WF, Kim Yr. Radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis. In: CRC handbook of animal models of pulmonary diseases. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1989; 165-182

(16) Groover TA, Christie AC, Merritt EA. Observations on the use of the copper filter in the roentgen treatment of deep-seated malignancies. South Med J 1922; 15:440-444

(17) Gross NJ. The pathogenesis of radiation-induced lung damage. Lung 1981; 159:115-125

(18) Gross NJ. Pulmonary effects of radiation therapy. Ann Intern Med 1977; 86:81-92

(19) Mollis M, Van Beuningen D. Radiation injury of the lung: experimental studies, observations after radiotherapy and total body irradiation prior to bone marrow transplantation. In: Scherer E, Streffer C, Trott KR, eds. Radiopathology of organs and tissues. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1991; 369-404

(20) Rubin P, Casseratt GW, eds. Respiratory system. In: Clinical radiation pathology (vol 1). Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1968; 423-470

(21) Travis EL. Lung morbidity of radiotherapy. In: Plowman N, McElwain T, Meadows A, eds. Complications of cancer management. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1990; 232-249

(22) Van den Brenk HAS. Radiation effects on the pulmonary system. In: Berdjis CC, ed. Pathology of irradiation. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins, 1971; 569-591

(23) Cohen Y, Gellei B, Robinson E. Bilateral radiation pneumonitis after unilateral lung and mediastinal irradiation. Radiol Clin North Am 1974; 43:465-471

(24) Rubin P, Casseratt GW. Clinical radiation pathology. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1968

(25) Smith JC. Radiation pneumonitis: case report of bilateral reaction after unilateral irradiations. Am Rev Respir Dis 1964; 89:264 -269

(26) Bennett DE, Million DR, Ackerman LV. Bilateral radiation pneumonitis, a complication of the radiotherapy of bronchogenic carcinoma: report and analysis of seven cases with autopsy. Cancer 1969; 23:1001-1018

(27) Kataoaka M, Kawamura M, Ueda N, et al. Diffuse gallium-67 uptake in radiation pneumonitis. Clin Nucl Med 1990; 15: 707-711

(28) Martin C, Romero S, Sanchez-Paya J, et al. Bilateral lymphocytic alveolitis: a common reaction after unilateral thoracic irradiation. Eur Respir J 1999; 13:727-732

(29) Bourke SJ, Dalphin JC, Boyd G, et al. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: current concepts. Eur Respir J 2001; 32(suppl): 81S-92S

(30) Arbetter KR, Prakash UBS, Tazelaar HD, et al. Radiation-induced pneumonitis in the "nonirradiated" lung. Mayo Clin Proc 1999; 74:27-36

(31) Fujita J, Bandoh S, Ohtsuki Y, et al. The role of anti-epithelial cell antibodies in the pathogenesis of bilateral radiation pneumonitis caused by unilateral thoracic irradiation. Respir Med 2000; 94:875-880

(32) Kataoka M. Gallium-67 citrate imaging for the assessment of radiation pneumonitis. Ann Nucl Med 1989; 3:73-81

(33) Kataoka M, Kawamura M, Itoh H, et al. Ga-67 citrate scintigraphy for the early detection of radiation pneumonitis. Clin Nucl Med 1992; 17:27-31

* From the Sections of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (Drs. Hassaballa and Rubin) and Medical Oncology (Dr. Bonomi), and the Departments of Radiation Oncology (Dr. Khan) and Radiology (Dr. All), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Pulmonary Medicine Associates (Dr. Cohen), Melrose Park, IL; and Pfizer Inc (Dr. Rubin), Research and Global Development, Ann Arbor, MI.

Manuscript received November 1, 2004; revision accepted February 10, 2005.

Reproduction of this article is prohibited without written permission from the American College of Chest Physicians (www.chestjournal. org/misc/reprints.shtml).

Correspondence to: Hesham A. Hassaballa, MD, Midwest Pulmonary Associates, 2340 S. Highland Ave, Suite 230, Lombard, IL 60148; e-mail: hesham74@qmail.com

COPYRIGHT 2005 American College of Chest Physicians
COPYRIGHT 2005 Gale Group

Return to Carboplatin
Home Contact Resources Exchange Links ebay