Diminazene
Find information on thousands of medical conditions and prescription drugs.

Diminazene

Diminazene is a di-amidine with sum formula: C14H15N7 and Molecular weight: 281.3 g/mole also known as 4,4'-(1-Triazene–1,3–diyl)bis(benzenecarboximidamide). It binds DNA and RNA and is the acting component of diminazene aceturate drugs (commercialized as Azidin, Berenil, Ganasag or Pirocide) directed, e.g., against Trypanosomiasis.

Home
Diseases
Medicines
A
B
C
D
Dacarbazine
Dactinomycin
Dalmane
Danazol
Dantrolene
Dapoxetine
Dapsone
Daptomycin
Daraprim
Darvocet
Darvon
Daunorubicin
Daunorubicin
Daypro
DDAVP
Deca-Durabolin
Deferoxamine
Delsym
Demeclocycline
Demeclocycline
Demerol
Demulen
Denatonium
Depakene
Depakote
Depo-Provera
Desferal
Desflurane
Desipramine
Desmopressin
Desogen
Desogestrel
Desonide
Desoxyn
Desyrel
Detrol
Dexacort
Dexamethasone
Dexamfetamine
Dexedrine
Dexpanthenol
Dextran
Dextromethorphan
Dextromoramide
Dextropropoxyphene
Dextrorphan
Diabeta
Diacerein
Diacetolol
Dial
Diamox
Diazepam
Diazoxide
Dibenzepin
Diclofenac
Diclohexal
Didanosine
Dieldrin
Diethylcarbamazine
Diethylstilbestrol
Diethyltoluamide
Differin
Diflucan
Diflunisal
Digitoxin
Digoxin
Dihydrocodeine
Dihydroergotamine
Dihydrotachysterol
Dilantin
Dilaudid
Diltahexal
Diltiazem
Dimenhydrinate
Dimercaprol
Dimetapp
Dimethyl sulfoxide
Dimethyltryptamine
Dimetridazole
Diminazene
Diovan
Dioxybenzone
Diphenhydramine
Diphenoxylate
Dipipanone
Dipivefrine
Diprivan
Diprolene
Diproteverine
Dipyridamole
Disulfiram
Disulfiram
Dizocilpine
Dobutamine
Docetaxel
Docusate sodium
Dofetilide
Dolasetron
Dolobid
Dolophine
Domperidone
Donepezil
Dopamine
Dopram
Doral
Doramectin
Doriden
Dornase alfa
Doryx
Dostinex
Doxapram
Doxazosin
Doxepin
Doxil
Doxil
Doxorubicin
Doxy
Doxycycline
Doxyhexal
Doxylamine
Drisdol
Drixoral
Dronabinol
Droperidol
Drospirenone
Duloxetine
Durabolin
Duragesic
Duraphyl
Duraquin
Dutasteride
Dv
Dyclonine
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z

Read more at Wikipedia.org


[List your site here Free!]


parasitological and serological prevalence of tsetse-transmitted bovine trypanosomosis in the Eastern Caprivi (Caprivi District, Namibia), The
From Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, The, 6/1/99 by Van Den Bossche, P

ABSTRACT

VAN DEN BOSSCHE, P, MUDENGE, D., MUBANGA, J. & NORVAL, A. 1999. The parasitological and serological prevalence of tsetse-transmitted bovine trypanosomosis in the Eastern Caprivi (Caprivi District, Namibia). Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 66:103-110

Between August 1995 and June 1997 a survey to determine the distribution of tsetse-transmitted trypanosomosis was conducted in the Eastern Caprivi (Caprivi District, Namibia). A total of 1 481 adult cattle was examined at 33 sampling sites. Direct parasitological diagnostic tests were used and eluted blood spots were screened for the presence of anti-trypanosomal antibodies.

Tsetse-transmitted trypanosomal infections were detected in 66 animals (4,5 %) from 14 different locations. The parasitological and serological prevalence of trypanosomosis was highest in the Mamili area. Trypanosomosis was virtually absent in the Linyanti/Chobe area and the target barrier along the Kwando River had significantly reduced the prevalence of trypanosomosis in cattle grazing to the east of it. This suggests that anti-trypanosomal antibody prevalence data can be used to evaluate and monitor the effectiveness of tsetse control measures. Survey results suggest that in the Katima Mulilo area, trypanosomal infections were being acquired when cattle grazed along the Zambezi River. Moreover, survey results indicate that tsetse have not been able to establish themselves in the Katima Mulilo area.

The parasitological prevalence in a herd and the respective prevalence of anti-trypanosomal antibodies was significantly correlated to the percentage of anaemic animals in that herd. Furthermore, the parasitological prevalence in a herd was positively correlated with the prevalence of anti-trypanosomal antibodies of that herd. It is concluded that the prevalence of anti-trypanosomal antibodies in a herd can be used as an additional indicator of the extent of infection in that particular herd.

Keywords: Caprivi, nagana, Namibia, prevalence, trypanosomosis, tsetse

INTRODUCTION

In Namibia, tsetse-transmitted trypanosomosis or "nagana" is restricted to the Caprivi District. The distribution of tsetse (Glossina morsitans centralis) is confined for the greater part to the Linyanti-MashiKwando drainage. The main foci are located along the Kwando River between Kongola and the Angolan and Zambian borders in the north and around Lupala and Nkasa "islands" in the south (Bingham, De Rooij, Flanagan et al. 1995).

Between 1964 and 1994, human and animal trypanosomosis were controlled by ground-spraying operations along the eastern and western banks of the Kwando River (Bingham etal. 1995). In 1994, a 5 kmwide, odour-baited, insecticide-treated, target barrier (Hargrove 1993) was constructed along the western side of the Kwando River starting near the Botswana border and extending to the Angola border. In the same year, a similar target barrier was constructed along the northern edge of the Mamili National Park.

In 1984, an outbreak of trypanosomosis in cattle was reported in the Katima Mulilo area. The presence of nagana in this area is of great concern especially because of the possible spread of tsetse southwards across the Caprivi strip to the Chobe River and, thence into Botswana. To establish the current distribution of tsetse-transmitted trypanosomosis in the Eastern Caprivi and to determine its spread in the Katima Mulilo area, a survey was conducted. Use was made of both parasitological and serological methods (antibody-detection). The value of these survey methods in establishing the distribution of tsetse-transmitted trypanosomosis is discussed in the light of the results obtained from the survey.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sampling area

The Eastern Caprivi lies to the east of the Kwando River (Fig. 1) in the Caprivi District (Namibia). It is more than 11 600 km2 in extent and has a population of over 122 000 head of cattle. The only tsetse species occurring is G. morsitans centralis.

Between August 1995 and June 1997, a survey of bovine trypanosomosis was conducted at 33 sampling sites (Fig. 1).

To facilitate the interpretation of the survey results, the sampling area was subdivided into survey areas. Sampling sites were categorized according to the grazing areas of the cattle and allocated to one of the survey areas. Four survey areas were identified (Table 1):

"Katima Mulilo area" (cattle grazing along the Zambezi and immediately south of Katima Mulilo) "Kwando area" (cattle grazing along the Kwando River, north of Ngonga)

"Mamili area" (cattle grazing along the Kwando/ Mashi River north of the Mamili National Park) "Linyanti/Chobe area" (cattle grazing along the Linyanti and Chobe Rivers)

Odour-baited target barriers were in place west of the Kwando survey area and south of the Mamili survey area (Fig. 1). Trypanocides, mainly diminazene aceturate (Berenil, Hoechst), were used frequently in cattle herds in the Mamili survey area.

Sampling size

A total of 1 481 adult cattle were examined. A crosssectional sampling method was applied. Sample sizes were calculated according to Cannon & Roe (1982). They depended on the total cattle population at a particular sampling site but never exceeded 60 head of cattle at a single sampling site. This maximum sample size allows the detection of at least one positive case if trypanosomal infections are present at a prevalence level of 5 %-this provides a confidence level of 95 %.

Sampling method

Direct parasitological diagnostic tests (Paris, Murray & Mcodimba 1982) were used. Blood was collected from an ear vein into heparinized microhaematocrit centrifuge capillary tubes and onto glass slides, as thick and thin blood films. The capillary tubes were sealed with "Cristaseal" (Hawksley) and centrifuged immediately in a microhaematocrit centrifuge for 5 min at 9000 rpm. After centrifugation, the packed cell volume (PCV) was determined. The buffy coat and the uppermost layer of red blood cells were extruded onto a microscope slide and examined for the presence of motile trypanosomes. Samples were examined with a phase-contrast microscope with a x 40 objective lens. Giemsa-stained thick and thin blood smears were examined under a x 100, oil immersion objective lens.

From each animal, blood contained in one heparinized microhaematocrit centrifuge capillary tube was extruded onto a filter paper (Whatman no 4, Whatman). Four different blood samples (blood spots) were collected on each filter paper. All filter papers were labelled indicating the date of collection, place of collection and the sample number. Samples were air dried out of direct sunlight and placed in a plastic bag with self-indicating silica gel desiccant. The bag was sealed and kept as cool as possible until the specimens were refrigerated or frozen. Eluted blood spots were screened for the presence of anti-trypanosomal antibodies using an indirect anti-trypanosomal antibody-detection Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbant Assay (ELISA) (Luckins 1977; Hopkins, Chitambo, Machila et al. 1998). Use was made of a Trypanosoma congolense (IL 3000) invariable antigen batch prepared by the Parasitology Laboratory of the Department of Paraclinical Studies of the School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia.

A rigorous system of quality assurance was adopted. Hence, each ELISA-microplate was run with strong positive, weak positive and negative reference sera which were required to comply with pre-set values. The Optical Density (OD) of each ELISA-sample tested was expressed as a percentage (Percentage Positivity, PP) of the strong positive reference standard (Wright, Nilsson, Van Rooij et al.1993). A cut-off of 28 % positivity was used. At this cut-off the assay had a sensitivity of 88,5 % and a specificity of 99 %. The true seroprevalence was calculated using these sensitivity and specificity values (Thrusfield 1986).

RESULTS

Parasitological prevalence

A total of 1 481 samples was examined. Tsetse-transmiffed trypanosomes were detected in 66 animals (4,5 %) sampled at 14 of the 33 sampling sites (Table 2).

All infections were detected on buffy coat and confirmed on thick and thin smears. The parasitological prevalence of Trypanosoma vivax, T congolense and mixed (T congolense and T vivax) infections was 81,8 %, 16,7 % and 1,5 %, respectively. Overall parasitological prevalence was highest in the Mamili survey area. The proportion of T. vivax infections varied significantly between the survey areas. T vivax infections were dominant in the Mamili area (95,9%) whereas all trypanosomal infections detected in cattle grazing in the Kwando area were T congolense.

The mean parasitological prevalence was low in the Katima Mulilo, Kwando and Linyanti/Chobe survey area (Table 3). A significantly higher mean parasitological prevalence was found in the Mamili survey area (Table 3).

Packed cell volume (PCV)

The average PCVs (Table 3) and PCV-profiles (Fig. 2) were significantly different between all survey areas (P

The percentage of anaemic animals (PCV

Serological prevalence of trypanosomal antibodies

A total of 1 196 blood spots were screened for trypanosomal antibodies (Table 4). Only 115 samples (9,6 %) were serologically positive (P > 28 %). Trypanosomal antibodies were detected in herds sampled at 18 out of the total of 30 sample sites where blood spots were collected (Table 4). The serological true prevalence varied considerably between locations (Table 4). Cattle at three sampling sites (10 %), where trypanosomes were detected using parasitological methods, had no anti-trypanosomal antibodies. A significant correlation (r= 0,58; Pc 0,01 ) was found between the parasitological and serological true prevalence of trypanosomosis at the various sampling sites.

Trypanosomal antibody titres were found in cattle from nine sampling sites where animals were parasitologically negative. Average serological true prevalence in the parasitologically negative herds was 7,9% compared to 29,4% in herds that were parasitologically positive. The mean serological true prevalence in each of the survey areas is summarized in Table 3.

The percentage of anaemic (PCV

DISCUSSION and CONCLUSION

Parasitological and serological prevalence of trypanosomosis in the Eastern Caprivi

According to the parasitological and serological prevalences, tsetse-transmitted trypanosomal infections in the Eastern Caprivi are confined to the Kwando River drainage and the close vicinity of Katima Mulilo. The Kwando River infestation complies with the scanty information on the historical distribution of tsetse in the Eastern Caprivi (Bingham et al. 1995). However, the Kwando River target barrier seems to have significantly reduced the spread of tsetse. The effectiveness of the target barrier in reducing tsetse challenge is clearly reflected in the low parasitological prevalence of trypanosomosis and the low prevalence of anti-trypanosomal antibodies in cattle sampled in the Kwando survey area.

South of the barrier, the parasitological prevalence of trypanosomosis was unexpectedly high. This is explained by the recent capture of tsetse at Lianshulu (R. Mkandawire, personal communication 1996). Parasitological and serological prevalence figures from the Mamili survey area indicate that trypanosomal infections are probably acquired when cattle graze and water along the Kwando River. The possibility that tsetse challenge may occur when cattle or tsetse cross the Mamili target barrier cannot, however, be excluded. Considering these results, regular follow-up surveys are needed to monitor the possible spread of tsetse and trypanosomosis into the Mamili area of the Eastern Caprivi.

The parasitological and serological prevalence rates confirm the reports of recent trypanosomosis outbreaks in the Katima Mulilo area. According to the serological data, cattle from two sampling sites (Fooma and Mpacha) face regular tsetse challenge. During an extensive tsetse survey conducted in the vicinity of Katima Mulilo no tsetse were trapped (P van den Bossche, unpublished data 1995) although tsetse flies are present in the adjacent Sesheke area of Zambia. It is, therefore, assumed that trypanosomal infections are being acquired when cattle graze along the Zambezi River. Ufortunately, the low sensitivity of trapping methods for G. m. centralis makes it impossible to draw conclusions from tsetse survey results alone. Information obtained from the serological survey, however, clearly indicates that tsetse have not been able to establish themselves in Katima Mulilo and areas south of Katima Mulilo. Nevertheless, there will be a need for close vigilance in these areas until the threat of invasion from the north has been removed.

None of the animals sampled south of Katima Mulilo and in the Linyanti/Chobe survey area were infected with trypanosomes. These data are, however, not sufficient to conclude that the disease is absent. The seroprevalence of anti-trypanosomal antibodies was also low. Since the predictive value of a serological test declines as the prevalence of the disease declines, the low seroprevalence of anti-trypanosomal antibodies in cattle sampled south of Katima Mulilo and in the Linyanti/Chobe survey area could even be an overestimation of the true prevalence (Thrusfield 1986). Using the serological prevalence data and with the sample sizes used in this survey it can be assumed, with a high degree of confidence, that trypanosomosis is absent in those areas.

Of particular epidemiological interest is the difference in the prevalence of T vivax infections in cattle from two areas despite their relatively close proximity. There may be several explanations. First, this could be explained by the occurrence of mechanical transmission although the role of biting flies in transmitting T vivax to cattle in tsetse-infested areas remains an unresolved issue (D'Amico, Gouteux, Le Gall & Cuissance 1996). Second, may be differences in host availability or host preference between the two areas. Antelopes, which are abundant in the Mamili area, are generally accepted to be reservoir hosts of T vivax from which the infection is transmissible to domestic ruminants (Hoare 1970). An increased feeding frequency by tsetse on antelopes could, therefore, result in a high T vivax prevalence in cattle. Finally, for a tsetse fly to become infective, it must live longer than the developmental period of the trypanosome. Since T vivax has the shortest developmental cycle, a high proportion of tsetse infected with T. vivax is expected in areas where large numbers of young tsetse flies are present. Proportionately larger numbers of younger flies relative to older flies may be recorded either when mortality is high in a relatively stable tsetse population, or when the mortality is low in an expanding tsetse population. The Mamili survey area is situated at the edge of the fly-belt. Ecological conditions for tsetse, at the edge of a fly-belt, are normally less favourable resulting in a high mortality rate of tsetse. This high mortality rate could favour the development of T vivax infections in tsetse and could explain the high T vivax prevalence rate in cattle sampled in the Mamili survey area.

Packed cell volume and trypanosomosis prevalence

Although anaemia can be caused by factors other than trypanosomosis, it remains one of the most important indicators of tsetse-transmitted trypanosomosis in cattle (Stephen 1986). The PCV-profile and average PCV of a herd is affected by the number of trypanosome-infected animals or the parasitological prevalence of trypanosomosis. This is clearly seen in the shift of the PCV distribution to the lower PCV-values in survey areas where trypanosomosis was detected (Fig. 2). This observation suggests that PCV-profiles can be used as an additional indicator of trypanosomosis even when trypanosomes could not be detected by parasitological diagnostic tests.

Interpretation of serological data

Contrary to the parasitological methods, the serological test used in this survey has high sensitivity and specificity. Nevertheless, interpreting anti-trypanosomal antibody prevalence rates remains difficult. This is mainly because such antibodies can persist for several months even after successful trypanocidal drug therapy or self-cure (Bocquentin, Very & Duvallet 1990). The effect of tsetse control measures on the transmission of bovine trypanosomosis is often assessed by determining the parasitological incidence of trypanosomosis in sentinel cattle. This type of surveillance is expensive and lacks sensitivity (Paris, Murray & Mcodimba 1982). Although antibody detection tests cannot form the basis of identifying infected animals (Nantulya 1990), a decline in antibody prevalence can also be used to assess the impact of tsetse control operation on the trypanosomosis challenge. Effectiveness of tsetse control measures can, therefore, be monitored by regular surveys to establish the prevalence of anti-trypanosomal antibodies. These types of surveys are easy to conduct, less time consuming than the normal surveillance and have high sensitivity and specificity. Once anti-trypanosomal antibodies have disappeared seroprevalence surveys can continue to be used as a sensitive monitoring system. Such a monitoring system is extremely useful in countries where tsetse-cleared areas are protected by, for example, target barriers to prevent re-invasion of tsetse from infested areas (Van den Bossche & Mudenge 1997).

Of primary interest when conducting this serological survey was to determine whether the population or herd has been exposed to trypanosomosis. In this respect, areas of particular interest are those where disease prevalence is too low to detect parasites by current parasitological diagnostic methods or where tsetse cannot be captured. In such cases, the determination of the anti-trypanosomal antibody prevalence of a herd makes it possible to distinguish between low challenge and no challenge. One such example is the Katima Mulilo survey area where the trypanosomosis situation could only be explained by combining parasitological and serological data.

Although some animals with recent trypanosomal infections may not yet have developed antibody response at the time of sampling, 90% of the parasitologically positive herds were also serologically positive. Moreover, herd true seroprevalence was positively correlated to parasitological prevalence and the percentage of anaemic animals. Those findings indicate that, on a herd basis, the prevalence of anti-trypanosomal antibodies can reflect the infection status or extent of disease.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was undertaken in collaboration with the Directorate of Veterinary Services (Namibia). The assistance of all the staff concerned with the survey is kindly acknowledged. The authors thank Dr R.J. Connor for his constructive comments on the manuscript. Mr J. Goodhall is thanked for drawing the map. The work was funded by the 6th European Development fund through the Regional Tsetse and Trypanosomiasis Control Programme (Accounting number 6.ACP.RPR.468).

REFERENCES

BINGHAM, M.G., DE ROOIJ, R.C., FLANAGAN, F.O., VALE HENRIQUES, J.O., JAMES, A.D., LOVEMORE, D.F., MACLAURIN, A.R., THAKERSI, H.C.D. & TIMBERLAKE, J.R. 1995. Study of the tsetse fly problem common to Angola, Botswana, Namibia and Zambia. Harare, Regional Tsetse and Trypanosomosis Control Programme. BOCQUENTIN, R., VERY, P & DUVALLET, G. 1990. Cinetique des anticorps apres traitement trypanocide chez des bovins

infectes experimantalement ou naturellement. Interet epidemiologique. Revue d'Elevage et de Medecine veterinaire des Pays tropicaux, 43: 479-483.

CANNON, R.M. & ROE, R.T.1982. Livestock disease surveys. A field manual for veterinarians. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

D'AMICO, F., GOUTEUX, J.R, LE GALL, F. & CUISANCE, D. 1996. Are stable flies (Diptera: Stomoxynae) vectors of Trypanosoma vivax in the Central African Republic? Veterinary Research, 27:161-170.

HARGROVE, J.W.1993.Target barriers for tsetse flies (Glossina spp.) (Diptera: Glossinidae): quick estimates of optimal target densities and barrier widths. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 83:197-200.

HOARE, C.A., 1970. Systematic description of the mammalian trypanosomes of Africa, in The African trypanosomiasis, edited by H.M. Mulligan, W.H. Potts & W.E. Kershaw, London: Ministry of Overseas Development, 2:24-59. HOPKINS, J.S., CHITAMBO, H., MACHILA, N., LUCKINS, A.G., RAE, RF., VAN DEN BOSSCHE, P & EISLER, M.C. 1998. Adaptation and validation of the antibody trapping ELISA, using dried blood spots on filter paper, for epidemiological surveys of tsetse transmitted trypanosomosis in cattle. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 37:91-99. LUCKINS, A.G.1977. Detection of antibodies in Trypanosomainfected cattle by means of a microplate enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 9:53-62.

NANTULYA, V.M. 1990. Trypanosomiasis in domestic animals: the problems of diagnosis. Revue Scientifique technique de l'office International des Epizooties, 9:357-367. PARIS, J., MURRAY, M. & MCODIMBA, FA.1982. Comparative evaluation of the parasitological techniques currently available for the diagnosis of African trypanosomiasis in cattle. Acta Tropica, 39:307-316.

STEPHEN, L.E. 1986. Trypanosomiasis. A veterinary perspec

tive. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

THRUSFIELD, M.1986. Veterinary epidemiology. Bodmin: Butterworths.

VAN DEN BOSSCHE, R & MUDENGE, D.1997. Prevalence of tsetse-transmitted trypanosomosis along the eastern/north eastern border of Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe Veterinary Journal, 28:49-59.

WRIGHT, RE, NILSSON, E., VAN ROOIJ, E.M.A., LELENTA, M. & JEGGO, M.H. 1993. Standardisation and validation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay techniques for the detection of antibody in infectious disease diagnosis. Revue Scientifique technique de l'office International des Epizooties, 12: 435-450.

P. VAN DEN BOSSCHE1, D. MUDENGE1, J. MUBANGA2 and A. NORVAL3

Regional Tsetse and Trypanosomosis Control Programme, PO. Box A 560, Harare, Zimbabwe

Regional Tsetse and Trypanosomosis Control Programme, RO. Box 350001, Chilanga, Zambia

Directorate of Veterinary Services, PB. X12022, Windhoek, Namibia

Copyright Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute Jun 1999
Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights Reserved

Return to Diminazene
Home Contact Resources Exchange Links ebay