Fluticasone chemical structure
Find information on thousands of medical conditions and prescription drugs.

Fluticasone

Fluticasone proprionate is a glucocorticoid often prescribed as treatment for asthma and allergic rhinitis. It is marketed with the brand name Flixotide® and Flixonase® by Allen & Hanburys and Flovent® and Flonase® by GlaxoSmithKline. more...

Home
Diseases
Medicines
A
B
C
D
E
F
Captagon
Famohexal
Famotidine
Faslodex
Faslodex
Fasoracetam
Felbamate
Felbatol
Felodipine
Felypressin
Femara
Femara
Fempatch
Femring
Fenfluramine
Fenofibrate
Fentanyl
Fexofenadine
Filgrastim
Filipin
Finasteride
Fioricet
Fiorinal
Flagyl
Flarex
Flavoxate
Flecainide
Flexeril
Flomax
Flonase
Flovent
Floxuridine
Fluacizine
Flucloxacillin
Fluconazole
Flucytosine
Fludarabine
Fludrocortisone
Flumazenil
Flunisolide
Flunitrazepam
Fluocinonide
Fluohexal
Fluorometholone
Fluorouracil
Fluoxetine
Fluphenazine
Flurazepam
Flutamide
Fluticasone
Fluvastatin
Fluvoxamine
FML
Focalin
Folic acid
Follutein
Fomepizole
Formoterol
Fortamet
Fortovase
Fosamax
Fosinopril
Fosinoprilat
Fosmidomycin
Fosphenytoin
Frova
Frovatriptan
Frusehexal
Fulvestrant
Fumagillin
Furazolidone
Furosemide
Furoxone
Fusafungine
Fusidic acid
Fuzeon
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z

How it works

The precise mechanisms of glucocorticoid action in asthma are unknown. Inflammation is recognized as an important component in the pathogenesis of asthma. Glucocorticoids have been shown to inhibit multiple cell types (e.g., mast cells, eosinophils, basophils, lymphocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils) and mediator production or secretion (e.g., histamine, eicosanoids, leukotrienes, and cytokines) involved in the asthmatic response. These anti-inflammatory actions of glucocorticoids may contribute to their efficacy in asthma. Typically, however, the action on the cells affected requires several days. Therefore, inhaled steroids are not used for immediate relief of asthma, but instead as preventive and maintenance therapy.

Clinical trials

This listing is NOT complete and should NOT be construed as support for treatment decisions. See also PubMed clinical manuscripts referring to fluticasone

  • Burge, P.S.; Calverley, P.M.; Jones, P.W.; Spencer, S.; Anderson, J.A.; and Maslen T.K. (2000). Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study of fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the ISOLDE trial. British Medical Journal 320 (7245), 1297-1303. PMID 10807619.
  • Paggiaro, P.L.; Dahle, R.; Bakran, I.; Frith, L.; Hollingworth, K.; and Efthimiou, J. (1998). Multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial of inhaled fluticasone propionate in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The Lancet 351 (9105), 773-780. PMID 9519948.
both support a positive outcome for use of fluticasone in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, also referred to as COPD

Read more at Wikipedia.org


[List your site here Free!]


Effect of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 on lung hyperinflation and exercise endurance in patients with COPD
From CHEST, 10/1/05 by D.E. O'Donnell

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of fluticasone propionate (FP)/ salmeterol Diskus (FSC) 250/50 BID and placebo (PLA) on lung hyperinflation and exercise endurance. A preliminary comparison of FSC and salmeterol (SAL) was included, allowing for initial evaluation of the contribution of FP to FSC.

METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study was conducted in 185 COPD patients with hyperinflafion at rest (mean FEV1 = 41%, FRC = 156% pred). Pre- and 3 hr post-dose spirometry, body plethysmography and constant-load cycle cardiopulmonary exercise tests (at 75% of maximum work rate) were performed at Day 1 (first dose) and Week 8. Post-dose evaluations were used for comparisons of FSC (n = 62) and PLA (n = 64), pre-dose for FSC and SAL (n = 59).

RESULTS: At a standardized time across exercise tests: inspiratory capacity (IC), tidal volume and ventilation were significantly (p [less than or equal to] 0.02) greater with FSC than PLA (Week 8 post-dose); and IC was greater (p = 0.031) with FSC than SAL (Week 8 pre-dose). No significant safety concerns were associated with the cardiopulmonary exercise tests.

CONCLUSION: FSC significantly reduced lung hyperinflation at rest and during exercise and increased exercise endurance time compared to PLA. Preliminary comparisons between FSC and SAL suggest superiority of FSC in patients with COPD.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: FSC is effective at improving exercise tolerance, a key goal in the management of stable COPD.

DISCLOSURE: D.E. O'Donnell, Grant monies (from industry related sources) Received research grants from GlaxoSmithKline; Consultant fee, speaker bureau, advisory committee, etc. Received consultant fees from GlaxoSmithKline.

D.E. O'Donnell MD * F. Sciurba MD B. Celli MD D.A. Mahler MD K. Webb MS C. Kalberg PhD G. Crater MD K. Knobil MD Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada

COPYRIGHT 2005 American College of Chest Physicians
COPYRIGHT 2005 Gale Group

Return to Fluticasone
Home Contact Resources Exchange Links ebay