Molecular structure of rofecoxib
Find information on thousands of medical conditions and prescription drugs.

Vioxx

Rofecoxib is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that was used in the treatment of osteoarthritis, acute pain conditions, and dysmenorrhoea. Formerly marketed by Merck & Co. under the trade names Vioxx, Ceoxx and Ceeoxx, it was voluntarily withdrawn from the market in 2004 because of concerns about increased risk of heart attack and stroke. more...

Home
Diseases
Medicines
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
Hydrocodone
Vagifem
Valaciclovir
Valcyte
Valganciclovir
Valine
Valium
Valnoctamide
Valproate semisodium
Valproic acid
Valpromide
Valrelease
Valsartan
Valstar
Valtrex
Vancenase
Vanceril
Vancomycin
Vaniqa
Vanticon
Vecuronium bromide
Velcade
Velivet
Venlafaxine
Ventolin
Vepesid
Verapamil
Verelan
Vermox
Versed
Vfend
Viadur
Viagra
Vicoprofen
Vidarabine
Vidaza
Videx
Vigabatrin
Viloxazine
Vinblastine
Vincristine
Vinorelbine
Viomycin
Vioxx
Viracept
Viread
Visine
Vistide
Visudyne
Vitaped
Vitrase
Vivelle
Volmax
Voltaren
Voriconazole
Vosol
W
X
Y
Z

Rofecoxib was one of the most widely used drugs ever to be withdrawn from the market. Worldwide, over two million people were prescribed Vioxx at the time. In the year before withdrawal, Merck had a sales revenue of US$2.5 billion from Vioxx.

Rofecoxib was available on prescription as tablets and as an oral suspension.

COX-2 selective inhibitor

Rofecoxib belongs to the group of NSAIDs known as COX-2 selective inhibitors or coxibs (CycloOXygenase-2 InhiBitors). Being COX-2 selective means that these drugs act specifically on one form of the cyclooxygenase (COX) enzyme, namely the COX-2, whereas previous NSAIDs inhibited both COX-1 and COX-2. This specificity allows rofecoxib and other COX-2 inhibitors to reduce inflammation and pain while minimizing undesired gastrointestinal adverse effects - peptic ulcers - that are common with non-selective NSAIDs such as aspirin, naproxen, and ibuprofen.

Interestingly, at the time of its withdrawal, rofecoxib was the only coxib with clinical evidence of its superior gastrointestinal adverse effect profile over conventional NSAIDs. This was largely based on the VIGOR (Vioxx GI Outcomes Research) study, which compared the efficacy and adverse effect profiles of rofecoxib and naproxen. (Bombardier et al., 2000).

Adverse drug reactions

Aside from the reduced incidence of gastric ulceration, rofecoxib exhibits a similar adverse effect profile to other NSAIDs.

Withdrawal from the market

VIGOR study

The VIGOR study, published in 2000, had indicated a significant 4-fold increased risk of acute myocardial infarction (heart attack) in rofecoxib patients when compared with naproxen patients (0.4% vs 0.1%, RR 0.25) over the 12 month span of the study. There was no significant difference in the mortality from cardiovascular events between the two groups. Nor was there any significant difference in the rate of myocardial infarction between the rofecoxib and naproxen treatment groups in patients without high cardiovascular risk. The difference in overall risk was accounted for by the patients meeting the criteria for low-dose aspirin prophylaxis of secondary cardiovascular events (previous myocardial infarction, angina, cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, or coronary bypass), but who were excluded from taking low-dose aspirin in the initial design study. Once this risk was noted, Merck notified investigators in other rofecoxib studies to modify allow high-risk patients to take low-dose aspirin. (Bombardier et al., 2000)

Merck's scientists interpreted the finding as a protective effect of naproxen in reducing the risk of MI in high cardiovascular risk patients by 80 percent (which some commentators have noted would make naproxen three times as effective as aspirin). The results of the VIGOR study were submitted to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in February 2001, which led to the introduction, in April 2002, of warnings on Vioxx labelling concerning the increased risk of cardiovascular events (heart attack and stroke).

Read more at Wikipedia.org


[List your site here Free!]


Despite Vioxx recall concerns, doctors stick with cox-2 inhibitors
From Drug Store News, 10/25/04

WHITEHOUSE STATION, N.J. -- While some suppliers are racing to fill the vacuum left by the recall Of Merck's Vioxx, a cox-2 inhibitor pulled off the market because of its link with an increased risk of heart disease, it does not appear that concerns over Vioxx's safety will carry over to Pfizer's cox-2 inhibitors Celebrex and Bextra.

An NDCHealth database found that 32 percent of current U.S. Vioxx prescription holders had been taking the drug for more than 18 months, the time frame in which Merck cited that individuals would be at risk for increased cardiovascular events.

In fact, by all accounts, the majority of patients seeking a new arthritis remedy were given Celebrex or Bextra, representing a significant boost of cox-2 inhibitor prescriptions to Pfizer.

Indeed, following the Vioxx recall last month, Pfizer was no stranger to the press, relaying that long-term studies of Celebrex found no similar link between the use of its cox-2 inhibitor and the risk of heart attacks.

"Each cox-2 inhibitor has a distinct chemical structure, and we would not expect them to have the same side-effect profile, stated Dr. Joe Feczko, Pfizer's president of worldwide development. "The data we've accumulated over time demonstrate that Celebrex does not increase the risk of serious cardiovascular events in patients with arthritis and pain, even at higher-than-recommended doses."

And doctors have no plans of abandoning cox-2 inhibitors as a first line of treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. "No matter how you shake it, it doesn't appear that you're seeing the same sort of risk [associated with Celebrex]," commented Arthur Kavanaugh, a spokesman for the American College of Rheumatology and a professor at the University of San Diego. And although there are no long-term studies that would support a similar assertion for Bextra, there likewise are no clinicals linking the newer cox-2 inhibitor to an increased risk of heart disease.

Within 24 hours of Merck's Sept. 30 announcement, about 2.4 percent of the 1.2 million Vioxx prescription holders, as measured by NDCHealth, had received new prescriptions for alternative therapies. Of those active prescriptions, 58 percent had moved to either Celebrex or Bextra, and 33 percent received a,.prescription for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Still, long-term concerns connecting cox-2 inhibitor use with an increase in heart disease linger because the simple fact is, the loss or a $5.3 billion prescription drug category is something the chain drug industry can ill afford.

Indeed, the pharmacy line item on drug store balance sheets has taken quite a few knocks in the last few years. The market for prescription-only hormone replacement therapies took a substantial hit following the news linking HRT use to an increased risk of breast cancer. And while the recent Claritin and Prilosec OTC switches represented sales boons on the OTC side, the gain was mitigated by the loss of prescription volume for the entire class of drugs and an increase in the number of chain drug competitors for those products.

The Vioxx recall may very well follow the same pattern as Bayer's Baycol recall did three years ago. When Baycol was lifted from the market, there were five other statin options that did not carry the same health risks as Baycol.

That's good news for pharmacists because even as some portion of the $1.8 billion worth of Vioxx dispensed in the United States last year will be lost to OTC alternatives--such as a combination of an NSAID like ibuprofen with a proton-pump inhibitor like Prilosec OTC to help manage heartburn symptoms sometimes common with the use of NSAIDs--the majority of that share accretion will fall back to Celebrex.

The Vioxx recall is bad news for pharmaceutical companies with cox-2 inhibitors in development, including Novartis Prexige, which already has been delayed Food and Drug Administration approval once. Those formulations now will face an additional hurdle of showing they are not linked to heart disease. with the new [applications] that come, there is always gong to be a question," Kavanaugh said. "People are going to be very suspicious [of new cox-2 inhibitors] until you get a very large body of data [showing no adverse risks]. The bar was just raised incredibly high."

Teva Pharmaceutical also suffers a loss from the recall. The company in late 2003 filed for approval to market a generic version of Vioxx.

COPYRIGHT 2004 Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
COPYRIGHT 2004 Gale Group

Return to Vioxx
Home Contact Resources Exchange Links ebay