Find information on thousands of medical conditions and prescription drugs.

Dermatophytosis

Dermatophytosis are fungal infections of the skin.

Home
Diseases
A
B
C
D
Dandy-Walker syndrome
Darier's disease
Dementophobia
Demyelinating disease
Dendrophobia
Dengue fever
Dental fluorosis
Dentinogenesis imperfecta
Dentophobia
Depersonalization disorder
Dermatitis herpetiformis
Dermatofibroma
Dermatographic urticaria
Dermatomyositis
Dermatophytosis
Desmoplastic small round...
Dextrocardia
Diabetes insipidus
Diabetes mellitus
Diabetes, insulin dependent
Diabetic angiopathy
Diabetic nephropathy
Diabetic neuropathy
Diamond Blackfan disease
Diastrophic dysplasia
Dibasic aminoaciduria 2
Diethylstilbestrol...
DiGeorge syndrome
Dilated cardiomyopathy
Diphallia
Diphtheria
Dipsophobia
Dissociative amnesia
Dissociative fugue
Dissociative identity...
Distemper
Diverticulitis
Diverticulosis
Dk phocomelia syndrome
Doraphobia
Double outlet right...
Downs Syndrome
Dracunculiasis
Duane syndrome
Dubin-Johnson syndrome
Dubowitz syndrome
Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Dupuytren's contracture
Dwarfism
Dysbarism
Dysgerminoma
Dyskeratosis congenita
Dyskinesia
Dysmorphophobia
Dysplasia
Dysplastic nevus syndrome
Dysthymia
Dystonia
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
Medicines

Read more at Wikipedia.org


[List your site here Free!]


STRAIN DIFFERENTIATION OF Trichophyton rubrum BY RANDOM AMPLIFICATION OF POLYMORPHIC DNA (RAPD)
From Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 11/1/04 by Baeza, Lilian Cristiane

SUMMARY

Trichophyton rubrum is an important cause of dermatomycoses. Molecular strain typing methods have recently been developed to address questions about epidemiology and source of relapse following treatment. This report describes the application of RAPD for molecular strain differentiation of this fungus utilizing the primers 1- (5'-d[GGTGCGGGAA]-3') and 6- (5'-d[CCCGTCAGCA]-3'). A total of five RAPD patterns were observed among 10 strains of T. rubrum, with each of the primers used. We conclude that RAPD analysis using primers 1 and 6 can be used in epidemiological studies.

KEYWORDS: Trichophyton rubrum: Molecular typing; RAPD.

Dermatophytes are keralinophilic Fungi responsible for causing dermatophytosis in man and animals13. T. rubrum is an important etiological agent of dermatomycoses, principally causing tinea pedis and tinea unguium.

In the last lew years, genotypic approaches have proved to be useful for solving taxonomic problems regarding dermatophytes8. Molecular typing could be of great use in epidemiological questions, e.g. routes of infection, common sources of infection, and dissemination areas as well as to determine whether the original isolate is responsible for relapse (i.e., treatment failure) or reinfection has occurred with a new isolate. Strain identification in the T. rubrum has been attempted using a range of molecular-typing procedures2,8,15. But until now, molecular genotyping of this fungus has limited success2,9 and the extent of interstrain genomic variation within this apparently clonal species appears to be limited2. Recently, the detection oF intraspecific variation in T. rubrum was reported by using amplification of subrepeat elements (TRS-1) from the ribosomal DNA nontranscribed-spacer region (NTS), with 21 TRS-1 PCR types recognized from 101 clinical isolates4, as well as, KAMIYA et al.6 observed 17 TRS-1 PCR types in 252 clinical isolates. YAZDANPARAST et al.14 also reported two or more T. rubrum strain types from an infectious site when these strains were analyzed by PCR-based typing method with variations in numbers of repetitive elements in the NTS of the ribosomal RNA gene repeals. In practic, RAPD could distinguish T. rubrum, T. mentagrophytes, and T. tonsurans8, whereas intraspecific variability has only been observed in the T. mentagrophytes group5. The aim of the present study was to investigate genotypic variability within T. rubrum, using RAPD with six random primers.

Strains: A total of 10 strains were isolated from patients with onychomycoses, in the Clinical Mycology Laboratory of the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo State (UNESP), Araraquara, SP, Brazil, and identified to species level using standard mycological procedures11.

Isolation of fungal DNA: All isolates were grown on Sabouraud's dextrose agar (Difco) supplemented with chloramphcnicol 0.05% [w/v] and incubated at 25 °C for 10 days. Liquid nitrogen was added to 1 to 2 g of mycelia in a mortar, and the cells were grounded with a pestle. Genomic DNA was extracted as described by DEL SAL et al.1 with a few modifications. In brief, the powdered mycelium was transferred to an Eppendorf tube and 500 µL of lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0; 1 mM EDTA; 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]; 100 µg mL^sup -1^ proteinase K) were added. Each sample was incubated for one h at 37 °C, and then 200 µL of 5-mol L^sup -1^ NaCl were added and incubated for 10 min at 65 °C. After that, 100 µL of 10% [w/v] cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB; Sigma) were added and incubation continued for a further 20 min at 65 °C. The solution was treated with RNase A (Roche) at a final concentration of 50 µg mL^sup -1^ for one h at 37 °C, and then extracted with an equal volume of phenolchloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1[v/v]), and centrifugea at 12,000 g for 15 min al 4 °C. This procedure was repeated three times. The DNA was precipitated with two volumes of ice-cold isopropanol at -20 °C for 20 min, washed twice in 500 µL of 70% ethanol, air dried, and resuspended in 100 µL of TR buffer (40 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0; 2 m M HDTA). DNA concentration was estimated by measuring the optical density at 260 nm.

RAPD: The following oligonucleotides (decamers) of arbitrary sequence were used as single primers in the RAPD experiments: 1-(5'-d[GGTGCGGGAA]-3'), 2- (5'-d[GTTTCGCTCC]-3'), 3- (5'-d[GTAGACCCGT]-3'), 4- (5'-d[AAGAGCCCGT]-3'), 5-(5'-d[AACGCGCAAC]-3'), 6- (5'-d[CCCGTCAGCA]-3'). Amplification reactions were performed in volumes of 25 µL containing 50 ng of template DNA, and a lyophilized mixture of a reaction buffer [30 mM KCl; 3 mM MgCl^sub 2^; 10 mM Tris (pH 8.3)], 0.4 mM of each dNTP, BSA 2.5 µg, 25 pmol of primer, and thermostable polymerases (Ampli Taq(TM) DNA polymerase and Stoffel fragment) (Ready-To-Go(TM) RAPD Analysis Beads- Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The samples were overlaid with sterile light mineral oil (Sigma) and amplification was performed in a thermo cycler (Perkin-Elmer 9700) as follows: one initial cycle for five min at 95 °C, followed by 45 cycles comprising denaturation (one min at 95 °C), annealing (one min at 36 °C); and extension (two min at 72 °C) and then a final extension for 10 min at 72 °C. Amplification products were separated by electrophoresis in 2% agarose gels, visualized by staining with ethidium bromide, and photographed under UV.

Two out of the six different random decamers examined (primers 1 and 6) reflected intraspecific polymorphisms within T. rubrum. Primer 1 yielded five different patterns among the isolates. The number of fragments varied from five to 12 bands ranging between approximately 1,800 and 180 bp in length. The isolates presented two common bands at 180 and 280 bp. Some groups of patterns (patterns A and B; D and E) were similar; in patterns A and B only two of the bands were not common (1,800 and 1,100 bp). Profile D showed a strong fragment at 400 bp, which was absent in profile E. Pattern C was the most different, and had only a few bands common with any of the other patterns (Fig. 1).

As shown in Fig. 2, five RAPD types were also observed among the strains studied with primer 6. The number of fragments varied from three to eight bands, ranging between approximately 1,300 and 200 bp in length. The RAPD profiles had two broad bands at 450 and 650 bp, which were common among all isolates. Profile A was the most common, representing four (40%) of the 10 strains. Profile type B showed one fragment of 200 bp in addition to those in profile A, type C presented two bands (200 and 550 bp) different of the pattern A. Profile type D showed four fragments (1,300, 1,100, 900 and 750 bp), not being found in the patterns A, B and C. Pattern E differed from others in showing an increased number of major bands.

Monitoring of fungal diseases is essential to improve our understanding of their epidemiology and to enable research and prevention efforts to be more effective. In order to improve such monitoring, it is important to follow rigorous epidemiological methods. Here we describe the application of the RAPD assay to the most frequently causative pathogen of superficial mycoses, T. rubrum using random primers. Our research suggested that both primers (1 and 6), for the first time employed in dermatophyte typing, could be used to subtype T. rubrum. Genetic research has demonstrated that dermatophytcs constitute an extremely homogeneous group. Some of the dcrmalophyles most frequently isolated have been identified by nested-PCR, using the genomic sequences of the DNA topoisomerase II genes7. However, there is a lack of easily methods available that reveal intraspecific polymorphisms suitable for epidemiological study of this fungus, characterization of molecular subtypes and therapeutic evaluation. The RAPD method of DNA fingerprinting has become quite popular for many infectious fungi and has been applied successfully8. However, the main problem is the reproducibility not only among laboratories, but also within a laboratory over limes. In this study, each sample of optimized genomic DNA was amplified in duplicate in repeated PCRs at different times; the DNA of two isolates were extracted from independent cultures and used in RAPD. The duplicate RAPD profiles showed identical band patterns (data not shown) and the reproducibility was 100%. The intraspecific polymorphisms achieved in our study differed from what is demonstrated in most of the available literature using RAPD. ZHONG et al.15 examined thirty isolates of T. rubrum by RAPD and found 22 strains to be indistinguishable and eight to show very minor differences, while LIU et al.8 using AP-PCR, reported no differences between eight strains of T. rubrum. The sequences applied in our study, probably hybridize with less conserved regions of the gcnomic DNA and generate a larger number of polymorphisms. Molecular methods, such as the analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP)3 and comparisons of sequences of the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) region ribosomar, are able to detect DNA differences between species and strains of dermatophytes, including T. rubrum. However, most of these techniques are complex, laborious, time-consuming, and not easily employable for routine work; in contrast, RAPD technology is simple, rapid and, in the absence of specific nucleotide sequence information for the many dermatophyte species, able to generate species-specific or intraspecific DNA polymorphisms on the basis of characteristic band patterns. Thus, we performed the intraspecific differentiation of T. rubrum in order to assist therapeutic and epidemiological studies of dermatomycosis. These variations in the genotype of T. rubrum have important implications for study design when looking at the epidemiology of dermatophyte infections.

RESUMO

Diferenciação de cepas de Trichophyton rubrum por amplificação randômica de DNA polimorfóco (RAPD)

Trichophyton rubrum é um importante agente causal dc dermatomicose. Os metodos de tipagem molecular têm sido rcccntemente desenvolvidos para responder questões sobre epidemiologia e auxiliar no esclarecimento de recidivas, após o tratamcnto. As seqüências aleatórias 1- (5'-d[GGTGCGGGAA]-3') c 6- (5'-d[CCCGTCAGCA]-3') foram usadas para tipagem molecular dcstc fungo por RAPD produxindo variabilidade intracspecífica. Cinco padrões foram ohservados entre os 10 isolados de T. rubrum, com ambas as seqüências. Foi concluído que a análise por RAPD pode ser utilizada para estudos epidemiológicos.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to the Pundação dc Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, PADC, and PUNDUNESP, who provided the financial support for this project.

REFERENCES

1. DEL SAL, G.; MANFIOLETTI, G. & SCHNEIDER, C. - The CTAB-DNA precipitation method: a common mini-scale preparation of template DNA from phagemids, phages or plasmids suitable for sequencing. Biotechniques, 7: 514-520, 1989.

2. GRÄSER, Y.; KÜHNISCH. J. & PRESBER, W. - Molecular markers reveal exclusively clonal in Trichophyton rubrum. J. clin. Microbiol., 37: 3713-3717, 1999.

3. JACKSON, C.J.; BARTON, R.C. & EVANS, E.G.V. - Species identification and strain differentiation of dermatophyte fungi by analysis of ribosomal-DNA intergenic spacer regions. J. clin. Microbiol., 37: 931-936, 1999.

4. JACKSON, C.J.; BARTON, R.C.; KEELY, S.L. & EVANS, E.G.V. - Strains identification of Triclinpliylon nibruiu by specific amplification of subrepcat elements in the ribosomal DNA nontranscribed spacer. J. clin. Microbiol., 38: 4527-4534, 2000.

5. KAC, G.; BOUGNOUX, M.E.; FEUILHADE De CHAUVIN, M.; SENÉ, S. & DEROUIN. F. - Genetic diversity among Tricliftphylon mentagrophytes isolates using random amplified polymorphic DNA method. Brit. J. Derm., 140: 839-844, 1999.

6. KAMIYA, A.; KIKUCHI, A.; TOMITA, Y. & KANBE, T. - PCR and PCR-RFLP techniques targeting the DNA topoisomerase II gene for rapid clinical diagnosis of the etiologic agent of dermatophytosis. J. derm. Sci., 34: 35-48, 2004.

7. KANBE, T.; SUZUKI, Y.; KAMIYA, A. et al. - PCR-based identification of common dermatophyte species using primer sets specific for the DNA topoisomerase II genes. J. derm. Sci., 32: 151-161, 2003.

8. LIU, D.; COLOE, S.; BAIRD, R. & PEDERSEN, J. - Application of PCR to the identification of dcrmalophytc fungi. J. med. Microbiol., 49: 493-497, 2000.

8. LIU, D.; COLOE, S.; PEDERSEN, J. & BAIRD, R. - Use of arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction to differentiate Trichophyton dermalophytes. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 136: 147-150, 1996.

9. MAKIMURA, K.; TAMURA, Y.; MOCHIZUKI, T. et al. - Phylogenetic classification and species identification of dermatophyte strains based on DNA sequences of nucler ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 1 regions. J. clin. Microbiol., 37: 920-924, 1999.

10. SOLL, D.R. - The ins and outs of DNA fingerprinting the infectious fungi. J. clin. Microbiol., 13: 332-370, 2000.

11. SUMMERBELL, R. & KANE, J. - Physiological and other special tests for identifying dermatophytes. In: KANE, J. & SUMMERBELL, R., ed. Laboratory handbook of Dcrmalophytcs. Belmont, Star Publishing, 1997. p. 45-47.

13. WEITZMAN, I. & SUMMERBELL, R.C. - The dcrmatophyles. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 8: 240-259, 1995.

14. YAZDANPARAST, Y; JACKSON, C.J.; BARTON, R.C. & EVANS, E.G.V. - Molecular strain typing of Trichophyton rubrum indicates multiple strain involvement in onychomycosis. Brit. J. Derm., 148: 51-54, 2003.

15. ZHONG, Z.; LI, R.; LI, D. & WANG, D. - Typing of common dermatophytes by random amplification of polymorphic DNA. Jap. J. med. Mycol., 38: 239-246, 1997.

Received: 25 June 2004

Accepted: 21 September 2004

Lilian Cristiane BAEZA(1) & Maria José Soares MENDES GIANNINI(1)

(1) Departamento de Análises Clínicas, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, UNESP, R. Expedicionários do Brasil 1621, 14801-902 Araraquara, SP, Brasil.

Correspondence: Maria José Soares Mondes Giannini, R. Expedicionários do Brasil 1621, 14801-902 Araraquara, SP, Brazil. E-mail: giannini@fcfar.unesp.br

Copyright Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo Nov/Dec 2004
Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights Reserved

Return to Dermatophytosis
Home Contact Resources Exchange Links ebay