Diabetes mellitus

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major risk for cardiovascular disease and mortality. There is some evidence that third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block occurs more commonly in patients with DM. In this study, we evaluated any possible association between DM and third-degree AV block using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes in a very large inpatient database.

Method: We used patient treatment files containing discharge diagnoses using ICD-9 codes of inpatient treatment from all Veterans Health Administration hospitals. The cohort was stratified using the ICD-9-CM code for DM (n = 293,124), a control group with hypertension butno DM (n = 552,623), and the ICD-9 code for third-degree AV block (426.0) and smoking (305.1, V15.82). We performed multivariate analysis adjusting for coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, smoking, and hyperlipidemia. Continuous and binary variables were analyzed using [chi square] and Fisher exact tests.

Results: Third-degree AV block diagnosis was present in 3,240 of DM patients (1.1%) vs 3,367 patients (0.6%) in the control group. Using multivariate analysis, DM remained strongly associated with third-degree AV block (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% confidential interval, 3.0 to 3.3; p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Third-degree AV block occurs significantly more in patients with DM. This finding may, in part, explain the high cardiovasctdar mortality in DM patients.

Key words: arrhythmias; atrioventricular block; diabetes mellitus; third-degree atrioventricular block; conduction abnormalities

Abbreviations: AV = atrioventricular; DM = diabetes mellitus; ICD-9-CM = International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification; PTF = patient treatment file

**********

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most chronic conditions worldwide, with an increasing prevalence of approximately 140 million persons having DM. This number is projected to increase to 300 million by the year 2025. (1) The prevalence of cardiovascular disease, such as congestive heart failure and coronary artery disease, is higher in patients with DM, (2-5) and they are at greater risk of death. (6,7) High mortality in patients with DM is independent of other known risk factors for cardiovascular disease (8) and is, in part, contributed to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. (7-9) There are reports (10-12) in the literature about increased prevalence of cardiac conduction abnormalities and autonomic neuropathy in patients with DM. In several case reports and small studies, (13-15) third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block is reported in patients with DM. However, most of these studies involves smaller populations. Using a large database, we conducted a retrospective study for the prevalence of third-degree AV block in patients with DM with comparison to a control group. We performed univariate and multivariate analysis adjusting for congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, and smoking.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data Collection and Data Sources

The Austin Automation Center has kept patient treatment files (PTFs) since July 1969. The PTF documents inpatient treatment from all Veterans Health Administration hospitals, extended care discharges and non-Veterans Affairs hospital discharges at the Veterans Health Administration expense. The PTF contains demographics of patients and the discharge diagnosis. Since 1984, a primary diagnosis and up to nine secondary diagnoses have been recorded according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). (1) This study was approved by Institutional Review Board.

Identification of Cases and Control Subjects

Cases consisted of patients diagnosed with type II DM but free of hypertension. Cases with ICD-9-CM code 250.0 (1) were identified from the PTF for 1990 to 2000. The date of a patient's first appearance in the PTF with type II DM was considered to be the date of diagnosis. Nonmatched control patients without DM were selected from the same patient treatment files during the same period. In order to have a large comparative population as control, we used hypertension as one of the most common diseases in humans. Using hypertension enabled us to have a control population that was larger than the DM population. Nonmatched controls were patients with hypertension (ICD-9-CM codes 401.0, 401.1, and 401.9) but no DM. A total of 845,748 patients were identified. There were 293,124 patients with DM and 552,624 patients in the control group.

Calculation of Comorbidity Index

A comorbidity index was calculated for cases and controls. An adaptation of the Charlson comorbidity index as applied to administrative databases was used. (16,17)

Collected Information and Extraction of Secondary Diagnoses

Demographics were obtained from the computerized records for both cases and controls. Individual social security numbers were used to search the inpatient files (1990-2000) for the following codes: third-degree AV block (426.0), congestive heart failure (428.0), coronary artery disease (414.9), smoking (305.1,V15.82), and hyperlipidemia (272.0-272.4 and 272.09).

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed (SAS/STAT; SAS Institute; Cary, NC). Any p value < 0.05 was used as a statistical significance. Continuous variables were calculated by unpaired t tests. Binary variables were studied using [chi square] and Fisher exact tests. Quantitative variables were documented as mean [+ or -] SD. In the multivariate analysis, a logistic regression model was used to calculate the odds of third-degree AV block in patients with DM vs control patients while adjusting for age, gender, and comorbid conditions. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used to document the strength of influence.

RESULTS

We evaluated 293,124 patients with DM and 552,624 control patients with hypertension but no DM who were hospitalized from 1990 to 2000. The mean age for DM patients and control patients was 65.8 [+ or -] 11.3 years and 64.8 [+ or -] 12.6 years ([+ or -] SD), respectively (p = not significant). Gender (male gender: 97.8% in the DM group and 97.4% in control group) or race (white race: 65.3% in the DM group and 68.3% in control group) were not significantly different in both groups. DM was found to be significantly associated with third-degree AV block in univariate and multivariate analysis. Third-degree AV block diagnosis was present in 3,240 of DM patients (1.1%) vs 3,367 patients (0.6%) in the control group (p < 0.0001). Using multivariate analysis, DM remained significantly associated with third-degree AV block (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval, 3.0 to 3.3; p < 0.0001).

DISCUSSION

This study is the first large-scale study demonstrating that DM is strongly associated with third-degree AV block. Using multivariate analysis, this association is independent of coronary artery disease or congestive heart failure. The cause of this association is not known but is most likely multifactorial. Autonomic neuropathy and metabolic derangement such as hyperkalemia (18) or acidosis (13,14) may explain this association. The occurrence of autonomic neuropathy affecting both sympathetic and parasympathetic neurons in patients with DM is well established (11,19-21) and is thought to be responsible for abnormal higher mean heart rate, (12) arrhythmias, (21) and death. (9) However, there are no studies available examining any association between autonomic neuropathy and conduction abnormalities. Patients with DM have been found to have an increased prevalence of conduction abnormalities such as left bundle-branch block, (22) right bundle-branch block, (23) and bifascicular block. (24) Left bundle-branch block has been found to be related to advance cardiovascular disease (23,25) and sudden death (26) in a general population. The prevalence of patients with DM is significantly higher in patients who require permanent pacemaker treatment, suggesting the susceptibility of these patients to significant bradyarrhythmias. (27) Bundle-branch blocks in patients with DM could progress to higher-degree AV block, explaining our finding, but the evidence for this concept is lacking. However, there are many reports (13,14,18) about the increased prevalence of high-degree AV blocks in patients with DM. Third-degree and high-degree AV blocks have been reported in DM cases during metabolic derangement and with postprandial stress. (28) Furthermore, the prevalence of DM with high-degree AV block has been found to be higher in patients requiring pacemaker treatment (29) and in patients with chronic heart block, (10) consistent with our finding. An autopsy report (30) in a small number of patients with DM and chronic heart block have shown changes in the conduction system typical for DM, such as diabetes microangiopathy. This explains the possible mechanism of this association and the increase risk of sudden death in DM patients. (9,31)

Limitations

This is a retrospective study, which presents limits. The results are limited to inpatient admissions, and therefore needs to be cautiously applied to an entire population. Our control patients consisted of hypertensive, nondiabetic patients who are not representative of all nondiabetic patients. However, hypertension increases cardiovascular risk; therefore, this association is valid. We had no data about the duration of DM. This study consisted mostly of men in a Veterans Affairs population that limits these data to male patients. We used an administrative database and not clinical data directly from a physician. ICD-9-CM coding is usually done by administrative personnel based on chart reviews and not directly on the patient and, therefore, making the data less accurate and thus limiting our study.

CONCLUSION

Diabetes mellitus is independently associated with third-degree AV block. This association may, in part, explain the higher risk of sudden death in patients with DM. Our finding is supported by current literature reporting susceptibility of patients with DM for autonomic neuropathy, cardiac conduction abnormalities, and bradyarrhythmias. Furthermore, bundle-branch blocks and high-degree and third-degree AV blocks have been found in patients who require pacemaker treatment. We suggest that more attention should be given to the early detection of life-threatening conduction abnormalities in patients with DM that could potentially decrease the incidence of sudden death in this population.

Manuscript received March 10, 2005; revision accepted May 19, 2005.

REFERENCES

(1) Hart AC, Hopkins CA, eds. Expert for hospitals: International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification. 6th ed. Vol 1. West Valley City, UT: St. Anthony Publishing, 2001; 29-30

(2) Goraya TY, Leibson CL, Palumbo PJ, et al. Coronary atherosclerosis in diabetes mellitus: a population-based autopsy study, J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40:946-953

(3) Blendea MC, McFarlane SI, Isenovic ER, et al. Heart disease in diabetic patients. Curr Diab Rep 2003; 3:223-229

(4) Nichols GA, Gullion CM, Koro CE, et al. The incidence of congestive heart failure in type 2 diabetes: an update. Diabetes Care 2004; 27:1879-1884

(5) Kannel WB, McGee DL. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease: the Framingham study. JAMA 1979; 241:2035-2038

(6) Jouven X, Desnos M, Guerot C, et al. Predicting sudden death in the population: the Paris Prospective Study I. Circulation 1999; 99:1978-1983

(7) Khaw KT, Wareham N, Bingham S, et al. Association of hemoglobin Ale with cardiovascular disease and mortality in adults: the European prospective investigation into cancer in Norfolk. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141:413-420

(8) Almdal T, Scharling H, Jensen JS, et al. The independent effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus on ischemic heart disease, stroke, and death: a population-based study of 13,000 men and women with 20 years of follow-up. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164:1422-1426

(9) Suarez GA, Clark VM, Norell JE, et al. Sudden cardiac death in diabetes mellitus: risk factors in the Rochester diabetic neuropathy study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76: 240-245

(10) Fairfax AJ, Leatham A. Idiopathic heart block: association with vitiligo, thyroid disease, pernicious anemia, and diabetes mellitus. BMJ 1975; 4:322-324

(11) Ziegler D, Cicmir I, Wiefels K, et al. Peripheral and autonomic nerve function in long-term insulin-dependent diabetes. Diabetes Res 1987; 4:9-14

(12) Valensi P, Attali JR, Sachs RN, et al. Abnormalities of 24 hour (Holter) ECG monitoring in diabetics: involvement of cardiac autonomic neuropathy and/or insulin therapy [in French], Diabetes Metab 1985; 11:337-342

(13) Ziliotto G. Total atrio-ventricular block arising in the course of diabetic acidosis which resolved completely after 3 months of insulin therapy [in Italian]. Cardiol Prat 1966; 17:199-206

(14) Bugaro L, Malipiero S. On a case of complete atrioventricular block associated with diabetic acidosis returned to sinus rhythm with compensation of the diabetic process [in Italian]. Friuli Med 1967; 22:652-660

(15) Kawai S, Fu L, Aziki K, et al. A degenerative lesion of the approach to the atrioventricular node producing second-degree and third-degree atrioventricular block. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1992; 15:2263-2269

(16) Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45:613-619

(17) Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40:373-383

(18) Ohmae M, Rabkin SW. Hyperkalemia-induced bundle branch block and complete heart block. Clin Cardiol 1981; 4:43-46

(19) Jermendy G, Toth L, Voros P, et al. Prospective study of cardiac autonomic neuropathy in diabetes mellitus [in Hungarian]. Orv Hetil 1991; 132:1351-1352,1355-1358

(20) Schnell O, Hammer K, Muhr-Becker D, et al. Cardiac sympathetic dysinnervation in type 2 diabetes mellitus with and without ECG-based cardiac autonomic neuropathy. J Diabetes Complicat 2002; 16:220-227

(21) Stevens MJ, Raffel DM, Allman KC, et al. Cardiac sympathetic dysinnervation in diabetes: implications for enhanced cardiovascular risk. Circulation 1998; 98:961-968

(22) Guzman E, Singh N, Khan IA, et al. Left bundle branch block in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a sign of advanced cardiovascular involvement. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2004; 9:362-365

(23) Jeong JH, Kim JH, Park YH, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for bundle branch block in adults older than 40 years. Korean J Intern Med 2004; 19:171-178

(24) Garcia Rubi DE, Badui Dergal E. Bifascicular block: long-term follow-up; report of 40 cases [in Spanish]. Arch Inst Cardiol Mex 1982; 52:31-38

(25) Schneider JF, Thomas HE Jr, Sorlie P, et al. Comparative features of newly acquired left and right bundle branch block in the general population: the Framingham study. Am J Cardiol 1981; 47:931-940

(26) Baldasseroni S, Opasich C, Gorini M, et al. Italian Network on Congestive Heart Failure Investigators. Left bundle-branch block is associated with increased 1-year sudden and total mortality rate in 5517 outpatients with congestive heart failure: a report from the Italian network on congestive heart failure. Am Heart J 2002; 143:398-405

(27) Grimm W, Langenfeld H, Maisch B, et al. Symptoms, cardiovascular risk profile and spontaneous ECG in paced patients: a five-year follow-up study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1990; 13:2086-2090

(28) Okamoto M, Hashimoto M, Yamada T, et al. Postprandial atrioventricular block in a patient with diabetes mellitus. Intern Med 1997; 36:579-581

(29) Podlaha R, Falk A. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus and other risk factors of atherosclerosis in bradycardia requiring pacemaker treatment. Horm Metab Res Suppl 1992; 26: 84-87

(30) Panja M, Dutta AL, Kar AK, et al. Cardiac changes implicated in chronic heart block. J Assoc Phys India 1991; 39:698-701

(31) El-Atat FA, McFarlane SI, Sowers JR, et al. Sudden cardiac death in patients with diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 2004; 4:187-193

Mohammad-Reza Movahed, MD, PhD; Mehrtash Hashemzadeh, MS; and M. Mazen Jamal, MD, MPH

* From the Division of Cardiology (Dr. Movahed), University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Orange; and Long Beach Veteran Administration Medical Center (Mr. Hashemzadeh and Dr. Jamal), Long Beach, CA.

Correspondence to: M. Reza Movahed MD PhD FCCP Assistant Clinical Professor, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, 101 The City Dr, Bldg 53, Rm 100, Orange, CA 92868-4080; e-mail: rmova@aol.com

COPYRIGHT 2005 American College of Chest Physicians
COPYRIGHT 2005 Gale Group