Find information on thousands of medical conditions and prescription drugs.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD; or GORD when spelling oesophageal, the BE form) is defined as chronic symptoms or mucosal damage produced by the abnormal reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus. . more...

Home
Diseases
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
Gastroesophageal reflux...
Rabies
Radiophobia
Rasmussen's encephalitis
Raynaud's phenomenon
Reactive arthritis
Reactive hypoglycemia
Reflex sympathetic...
Regional enteritis
Reiter's Syndrome
Renal agenesis
Renal artery stenosis
Renal calculi
Renal cell carcinoma
Renal cell carcinoma
Renal cell carcinoma
Renal failure
Renal osteodystrophy
Renal tubular acidosis
Repetitive strain injury
Respiratory acidosis
Restless legs syndrome
Retinitis pigmentosa
Retinoblastoma
Retinoschisis
Retrolental fibroplasia
Retroperitoneal fibrosis
Rett syndrome
Reye's syndrome
Rh disease
Rhabdomyolysis
Rhabdomyosarcoma
Rheumatic fever
Rheumatism
Rheumatoid arthritis
Rickets
Rift Valley fever
Ringworm
Rocky Mountain spotted fever
Romano-Ward syndrome
Roseola infantum
Rubella
Rubeola
Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome
Rumination disorder
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
Medicines

This is commonly due to transient or permanent changes in the barrier between the esophagus and the stomach. This can be due to incompetence of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), transient LES relaxation, or association with a hiatal hernia. Gastric regurgitation is an extension of this process with retrograde flow into the pharynx or mouth.

Symptoms

Heartburn is the symptom of acid in the esophagus, characterized by a burning discomfort behind the breastbone (sternum). Findings in GERD include esophagitis (reflux esophagitis) – inflammatory changes in the esophageal lining (mucosa) – strictures, difficulty swallowing (dysphagia), and chronic chest pain. Patients may have only one of those findings. Atypical symptoms of GERD include cough, hoarseness, changes of the voice, chronic ear ache, or sinusitis. Complicatons of GERD include stricture formation, Barrett's esophagus, esophageal ulcers and possibly even lead to esophageal cancer.

Occasional heartburn is common but does not necessarily mean one has GERD. Patients that have heartburn symptoms more than once a week are at risk of developing GERD. A hiatal hernia is usually asymptomatic, but the presence of a hiatal hernia is a risk factor for development of GERD.

Adults

The most prominent symptom of GERD is heartburn, the sensation of burning pain in the chest coming upward towards the mouth caused by reflux of acidic contents from the stomach to the esophagus.

Patients with GERD also tend to get the feeling of a sour or salty taste at the back of their throats due to regurgitation. This can sometimes happen even if the pain of heartburn is absent.

Less common symptoms:

  • Chest pain without any of the above
  • Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing)
  • Halitosis (bad breath)
  • Regurgitation (vomit-like taste in the mouth)
  • Repeated throat clearing
  • Water brash (the sensation of a large amount of non-acid liquid due to sudden hypersecretion of saliva)

Complications:

  • Strictures or scarring of esophagus (especially young children).
  • Barrett's esophagus (sometimes referred to as Barrett's Disease)
  • Esophageal cancer

Important Warning symptoms:

  • Trouble swallowing Dysphagia requires immediate medical attention
  • Vomiting blood or partially-digested blood (looks like coffee grounds) requires immediate medical attention as does digested blood in the stools.

GERD in Children

GERD is commonly overlooked in infants and children. Symptoms may vary from typical adult symptoms. GERD in children may cause repeated vomiting, effortless spitting up, coughing, and other respiratory problems. Inconsolable crying, failure to gain adequate weight, refusing food and bad breath are also common. Children may have one symptom or many - no single symptom is universally present in all children with GERD.

Read more at Wikipedia.org


[List your site here Free!]


Citric acid cough threshold in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease rises after laparoscopic fundoplication
From CHEST, 10/1/05 by Dariusz Ziora

Background: It has been reported that antireflux surgery can diminish chronic cough due to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) that is resistant to pharmacologic therapy. The aim of this study was the assessment of citric acid cough threshold (CACT) in patients with chronic cough due to GERD before and 3 months after laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication.

Methods: Thirty subjects (20 women and 10 men; median age, 45.3 years) with chronic cough due to GERD and 15 healthy volunteers underwent cough challenge with doubling concentrations of citric acid. Twenty subjects with GERD, a group of 14 women and 6 men (mean age, 45.5 years), underwent the same protocol 3 months after laparoscopic fundoplication. Daytime and nighttime cough score questionnaires (verbal category descriptive score) were completed in all groups.

Results: The geometric mean of CACT was significantly lower in GERD patients (9.62 mg/mL) than in healthy volunteers (50.8 mg/mL, p < 0.001). The results of cough score measurement significantly improved within 2 weeks after laparoscopic surgery. In 13 weeks of postoperative follow-up, cough disappeared or was greatly improved in 14 of the 20 patients (70%); in 3 other patients, cough resolved partially. In three patients, there was no improvement in cough. Cough challenge after surgery revealed a significant increase in mean cough threshold, from 8.28 to 19.03 mg/mL (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The results suggest that GERD influences CACT, which was significantly lower in GERD patients compared to healthy subjects. A significant correlation was found between subjective and objective measurements of cough in GERD patients. We found laparoscopic fundoplication to be objectively beneficial in GERD-induced chronic cough, as it reduced the CACT.

Key words: chronic bronchitis; chronic cough; citric acid; cough questionnaire; cough threshold; esophageal pH monitoring; gastroesophageal reflux disease

Abbreviations: CACT = citric acid cough threshold; GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease; VCD = verbal category descriptive

**********

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is among the most common causes of chronic cough in all age groups, exceeded in frequency only by postnasal drip syndrome and asthma. (1) Moreover, chronic cough can be the sole presenting manifestation of GERD. (2,3) However, up to 75% patients with GERD-induced cough may have no GI symptoms. (4) Studies (5,6) have shown that antireflux surgery, ie, laparoscopic fundoplication, can improve GERD-related symptoms including chronic cough resistant to intensive pharmacotherapy. Little is known about the relationship between cough threshold and subjective assessment of cough intensity in GERD patients, especially after laparoscopic fundoplication. In our preliminary study (7) in a group of GERD patients with chronic cough before antireflux surgery, we observed the relationship between subjective and objective evaluations of cough and means of citric acid cough threshold (CACT) values. We also proved the safety of the CACT evaluation procedure. The aim of our study was to objectively assess cough reflex sensitivity by estimating the CACT in patients with GERD-induced chronic cough. We examined the influence of treatment by laparoscopic fundoplication on cough itself and cough threshold in those patients. We also investigated the relationship between subjective (cough questionnaire) and objective (CACT) assessments of cough severity in patients with GERD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects

Group 1: GERD Patients With Chronic Cough: Thirty nonsmoking patients (10 men and 20 women; mean age, 45.3 years; range, 20 to 70 years) with at least a 3-month history of chronic cough due to GERD. Mean duration of cough was 36 months (range, 3 to 180 months). In all patients, reflux esophagitis was endoscopically interpreted by criteria of Sonnenberg and coworkers. (8) Twenty-four--hour esophageal pH monitoring using sound (G-9011 Digitrapper MK III; Syntetics; Solothurn, Switzerland) was performed and interpreted according to Irwin and coworkers. (9) GERD-related cough was recognized when the following criteria proposed by Irwin and co-workers (9) were met: (1) any gastroesophageal reflux parameter in the distal esophagus above normal physiologic values, ie, > 51 acidic reflux events, four or more acidic reflux events lasting > 4 min, pH < 4 over > 4.4% of the total time of measurement, longest supine and upright reflux events lasting > 5.6 min and > 16.8 min, respectively; and/or (2) a reflux event that appeared to induce a cough.

Other causes of chronic cough were excluded in all patients according to the protocol described by Irwin and Madison. (10) In all patients, we found normal chest radiographic findings, no changes on auscultation, and normal spirometric parameters: [FEV.sub.1], FVC, and peak expiratory flow, expressed as predicted values according to Quanjer et al. (110 Coexisting asthma was excluded by histamine and exercise provocation tests and negative skin-prick test results with common allergens. The patients with GERD had no history of chronic bronchitis and no exposition to irritants in the workplace. Postnasal drip syndrome was excluded by careful laryngologic examination. In all patients, bronchoscopy revealed no abnormalities of the bronchial tree. From this group, 20 previously described patients (7) were classified for laparoscopic fundoplication (5 men and 15 women; mean age, 45.5 years; range, 20 to 70 years) with at least a 3-month history of chronic cough due to GERD. Mean duration of cough was 54 months (range, 3 to 180 months).

The indication for surgery was objective signs of GERD without improvement after 6 months of pharmacologic treatment. All of the patients either failed to respond to the maximal pharmacologic therapy of GERD, including high-dose proton pump inhibitors and a prokinetic drug administered simultaneously for at least 6 months, or, after temporary recovery, their cough returned when pharmacotherapy was discontinued. Patients completed their cough questionnaires 1 day every week for 3 months after surgery, describing their complaints from that day and the previous night. The last questionnaire score was completed 13 weeks after surgery, on the day when the second cough challenge with citric acid was performed. Twenty subjects with GERD and chronic cough later underwent surgical treatment by laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication. Details of the surgical procedure have been described elsewhere. (12,13)

Healthy Volunteers: Control subjects were recruited by local advertisement. This group consisted of 15 healthy, nonsmoking, nonatopic volunteers (8 men and 7 women; mean age, 37.5 years; range, 22 to 70 years) with normal spirometry and normal chest radiographic findings. None of the subjects from any group had been receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors within the previous 3 months, or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory, antihistamine, antitussive, or sedative medications within the 5 days before the study. Antireflux pharmacologic therapy (if applicable) was discontinued at least 10 days before cough challenge. No history of respiratory tract infection within the previous past 6 weeks before cough challenge was noted.

Methods

Subjects from all groups completed a cough questionnaire with a verbal category descriptive (VCD) score described by Chang et al. (14) The VCD score was assigned to a description for daytime and nighttime cough.

Daytime Score: Daytime scores were calculated as follows: 0 = no cough; 1 = cough for one or two short periods only; 2 = cough for more than two short periods; 3 = frequent coughing but does not interfere with work or other activities; 4 = frequent coughing which interferes with work or other activities; and 5 = cannot perform most usual activities due to severe coughing.

Nighttime Score: Nighttime scores were calculated as follows: 0 = no cough at night; 1a = cough on waking only; 1b = cough on going to sleep only; 2 = awakened once or awakened early due to coughing; 3 = frequent waking due to coughing; 4 = frequent coughs most of the night; 5 = distressing cough.

All subjects completed the cough questionnaire, assisted by one co-inhabiting person to describe the subject's daytime and nighttime cough severity on the day and night before the cough challenge. The subjects then underwent CACT challenge according to the method described by Auffarth et al, (15) adapted to the Asthma Provocation System (Jaeger; Wurzburg, Germany) as described previously. (7)Cough challenges were performed at the same time of day, between 1 PM and 3 PM. All subjects ate breakfast by 9:00 AM and were asked not to eat or drink anything until the cough challenge was completed. On the day of the cough challenge, patients were not allowed to eat any food containing menthol or peppermint. The challenge was performed with a series of doubling concentrations of citric acid diluted in saline solution from 1 to 512 mg/mL at 18 to 20[degrees]C. Patients first inhaled saline solution followed by 16 breaths each of citric acid solution in increasing order. Citric acid was administered with a breath-activated dosimeter (output, 0.015 mL/s; Asthma Provocation System; Jaeger) for the period of 0.9 s of each breath, to achieve the same cumulative dose as in the original method. (15) Patients were asked to breathe regularly with the frequency of normal tidal breathing. Each citric acid solution was inhaled in 16 breaths that lasted approximately 1 min, as described by Auffarth et al. (15) This procedure was not accompanied by any adverse symptoms.

[FEV.sub.1] measurements were carried out 30 s and 90 s after completing every 16 breaths of every concentration intake. The inhalations were stopped when [FEV.sub.1] had fallen by [greater than or equal to] 20% from baseline. The interval between doses of each concentration was at least 5 min. One dose of 16 breaths of 0.9% NaCl solution was added in random order to each protocol to blind the study. Patients were told that some irritation of the throat could occur during inhalation, but they were not informed about cough being measured. The cough threshold was defined as the first concentration of citric acid causing at least two coughs or one cough salve, providing that the next (doubled) concentration, administered after 30 min, also led to at least two coughs. The challenge was discontinued in any subject who reached cough threshold after < 16 breaths of specific concentration of citric acid solution. Cough was observed and cough threshold was arbitrarily estimated by two independent observers. If no cough was observed, the cough threshold was set at 512 mg/mL. The study protocol was approved by the local Medical Ethics Committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants in the study.

Statistical Analysis

All calculations were performed using statistical software (Statistica; StatSoft; Cracow, Poland). The geometric mean cough threshold and SE of the geometric mean were calculated for each group of subjects. The CACTs were log-transformed before analysis. Log CACT values were compared by means ([+ or -] SD, SEM) of the Mann-Whitney U test. The median of the cough questionnaire counts was calculated for every group. Spearman rank correlation was used to assess the following: (1) the association between cough severity by questionnaire and cough threshold value, and (2) the relationship between total reflux time in pH monitoring and cough threshold value. A paired Wilcoxon test was used for the comparison of spirometric values before and after cough challenge, and mean log cough thresholds before and after surgery. The 0.05 level of significance was used throughout.

RESULTS

In two patients from group 1, chronic cough was the sole symptom of GERD. The rest of the subjects had, apart from cough, other symptoms of GERD (Table 1). Approximately 73% patients with GERD had, apart from chronic cough, at least two other symptoms, and 23% of patients had at least three other symptoms.

The geometric mean of citric acid cough threshold in the patients with GERD who were classified for surgical treatment (CACT [+ or -] geometric SEM, 8.28 [+ or -] 7.36 mg/mL) was significantly lower than it was in the healthy subjects (50.8 [+ or -] 17.42 mg/mL, p < 0.001). In the entire group of GERD patients, the mean total time of acid exposure (pH < 4) in 24-h esophageal pH monitoring was 9.04% (range, 4.0 to 18.8%). No significant correlation was found between the time of exposure to pH < 4 and the CACT value. Mean spirometric values of [FEV.sub.1], FVC, peak expiratory flow (percentage of predicted), and mean expiratory flow at 50% of vital capacity measured 10 min after completing the cough challenge did not significantly change from the baseline in any group of subjects (data not shown).

Daytime and nighttime cough severity were measured by questionnaire in 20 patients from the GERD group after laparoscopic fundoplication. Measurements were taken every week for 13 weeks and concerned cough intensity of the day of the questionnaire (Fig 1) and the preceding night (Fig 2). The median daytime cough score severity before surgery was 3 points. Two weeks after fundoplication, the median decreased to 2 points; at the end of the study, the median was 1 point (Fig 1). The median nighttime cough score severity before surgery was 2 points. One week after fundoplication, the median was 1 point; 8 weeks after surgery, it reached 0 (Fig 2).

[FIGURES 1-2 OMITTED]

Thirteen weeks after fundoplication, the CACT challenge was repeated. Ten patients had higher CACTs than before surgery. In seven patients, the values of cough threshold were unchanged. Three patients showed a slightly lower CACT than previously. The geometric mean of CACT ([+ or -] geometric SEM) values measured 13 weeks after laparoscopic fundoplication (19.03 [+ or -] 13.83 mg/mL) was higher than before surgery (8.28 [+ or -] 7.36 mg/mL; Fig 3). CACT values and their geometric means compared to those of the healthy subjects are shown in Figure 4.

[FIGURES 3-4 OMITTED]

After 13 weeks of postoperative follow-up, cough either disappeared entirely or decreased in 14 of the 20 patients (70%) who underwent surgery; the cough resolved partially in 3 other patients. Of the three subjects who had no improvement in cough, cough reflex sensitivity decreased (CACT was raised) by two concentrations in two subjects, while in one subject cough reflex sensitivity increased (CACT decreased) by one concentration. However, from among three patients in whom cough reflex sensitivity increased after surgery, CACT decreased in two cases by two concentrations, and in one case by one concentration. In only one case did daytime cough not improve, whereas in two others it resolved completely. To summarize, from among six patients with GERD whose cough did not improve after surgery (meaning that cough resolved partially or that no improvement was observed), cough reflex sensitivity decreased (ie, CACT was raised) in four subjects, increased in one subject, and remained unchanged in one subject.

Thirteen weeks after surgery a significant negative correlation was found between nighttime cough severity by questionnaire and CACT values (R = -0.6; p = 0.008). No correlation was found between improvement of both daytime and nighttime cough and increase in cough threshold after surgery in GERD patients (R = -0.24, p = 0.30; R = -0.37, p = 0.10, respectively).

DISCUSSION

Cough threshold assessments in other studies (16,17) have proved that patients with GERD are likely to acquire chronic cough. Although gross aspiration and microaspiration from proximal esophageal reflux can cause cough in most patients with GERD, chronic cough is likely to result from the presence of gastric acid in the distal esophagus stimulating a vagally mediated distal esophageal-tracheobronchial reflex. Some authors (17) have suggested that patients with

GERD, even without respiratory symptoms, had a reduced cough threshold, as measured by inhaled capsaicin, but this opinion requires confirmation. The phenomenon appears to be due to acid reflux irrespective of the presence of esophagitis, suggesting that entry of gastric acid into the distal esophagus, rather than esophageal mucosal damage, is the major cause of GERD-induced cough. CACT values in GERD patients significantly correlated with daytime cough severity questionnaire results in our study. No correlation was found between CACT values and nighttime cough score, but it might have been undetected due to the possible difficulty or differences in perception of night cough phenomenon in individuals: if the cough did not awaken the patient or his co-inhabitant, it might not have been noted in the diary.

The severity of cough can be measured in different ways. For example, the Adverse Cough Outcome Survey has been shown to be a good and reliable tool. (5) Cough intensity in our study was described with the use of a cough questionnaire with a VCD score, estimated by Chang and coworkers (14) to be more highly correlated to the objective measurement than is the visual analog scale. However, cough diaries or questionnaires are helpful in the subjective evaluation of cough intensity, while the objective assessment of cough may require a more scientific method, such as cough threshold challenge by citric acid or capsaicin.

Cough threshold challenge with citric acid solutions was well tolerated and safe; no significant fall in [FEV.sub.1] during and after challenge was observed. To avoid tachyphylaxis, (18) a citric acid solution of higher concentration was administered following a 30-min interval after reaching the CACT.

Effective therapy of GERD digestive symptoms may fail to achieve satisfactory and long-lasting improvement in GERD-induced cough. It is possible that antireflux medical therapy may require high doses of drugs and take a long time to bring expected benefits in cough control. (1) Furthermore, chronic cough may not disappear despite successful elimination of esophageal acid. (9) Thus, antireflux surgery is the only therapeutic alternative after failed pharmacologic therapy. Laparoscopic fundoplication has been accepted as a standard method of surgical treatment of GERD in recent years. There are two methods of fundoplication. The Nissen fundoplication method consists of a 360[degrees] wrap performed over a 56 to 60F bougie using the fundus of the stomach. The short gastric vessels are divided. Toupet fundoplication is a 200 to 270[degrees] wrap performed over a 56 to 60F bougie using the fundus of the stomach. The short gastric vessels are divided in this procedure as well.

Both surgical procedures are effective in correcting gastroesophageal reflux, but the laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication was found to be associated with a lower incidence of postoperative digestive complications, such as dysphagia, than was the laparoscopic Nissen operation. (12,13) The laparoscopic fundoplication approach offers the advantages of clear visualization, adequate dissection, and precise repair, along with the benefits associated with endoscopic surgery: diminished postoperative pain and discomfort, reduced hospitalization, and quicker return to normal activities. Toupet fundoplication may be preferable to the Nissen technique for many patients requiring surgical treatment of reflux disease; indications for this method have increased. (19-24)

Chronic cough due to GERD can lead to potential physical and psychosocial complications, which can be observed as a decrease in health-related quality of life (25) and sickness impact profile. (5) The efficacy of surgical treatment of GERD for cough disorders has been observed in previous studies. Tibbling et al (26) achieved clinical improvement and diminished cough intensity in 80% of operated patients with GERD and cough. Patti et al (6) observed improvement in chronic cough in 74% of operated patients and in up to 83% of subjects with proven cough-reflux correlation in 24-h pH monitoring. Finally Novitsky et al (5) achieved improvement in 86% of operated subjects. In our study, cough disappeared or was greatly improved in 14 of 20 operated patients (70%); in 3 other patients, it resolved partially within 13 weeks of postoperative follow-up. The total percentage of patients with improvement was 85%. Most of our patients noted a decrease in cough severity within several days after fundoplication. The median daytime and nighttime cough intensities decreased after 2 weeks and 1 week, respectively. This rapid decline of cough intensity after laparoscopy may be the result of weakening the esophageal-bronchial reflex postulated by Irwin et al. (27) This observation underlines its possible leading role in generating cough in patients with GERD. According to Tibbling et al, (26) expected benefits from surgery in chronic cough should be fully revealed within 6 months after surgery. Longer observation (3 years) did not reveal further benefits. The decline in cough severity and improvement of quality of life after surgery are reported to be stable for 1 year of follow-up. (5) However, the results of our study suggest that despite fundoplication CACT measured 3 months after surgery is still lower in some patients than in healthy subjects. There is some difficulty in interpreting our results because of the mismatched gender proportions between our healthy subjects (8 men and 7 women) and our study group (5 men and 15 women). It is well recognized that cough reflex sensitivity is nearly four times greater in healthy women than in healthy men, both in young and middle-aged adults. (28-29)

No correlation was found between improvement in either daytime or nighttime cough and increased cough threshold after laparoscopic fundoplication. We wonder if GERD-associated cough is actually due to increased cough reflex sensitivity induced by gastroesophageal reflux. This issue requires future investigations concerning relationship between GERD-induced cough, GERD-induced cough reflex hypersensitivity, and acid reflux.

It is difficult to state with certainty whether fundoplication per se influences cough reflex sensitivity, although our findings seem to confirm this hypothesis. More conclusive findings would require the examination of other group of GERD patients without cough who had undergone the surgery.

CONCLUSION

Since most of our subjects with GERD-induced chronic cough had previously not responded to pharmacologic antireflux therapy and recovered only following surgical intervention, we conclude that treatment by laparoscopic fundoplication should be considered for GERD with chronic cough. Finally, in confirming previous reports, (4-6,26) we conclude that laparoscopic fundoplication is beneficial in the treatment of GERD-induced chronic cough because it leads to an increase in cough threshold, probably by weakening the esophageal-bronchial reflex.

Each hypothesis of cough reflex phenomenon in GERD stipulates that it is necessary to irritate the esophageal mucosa to activate the GERD-dependent cough reflex. We suspect that such constant irritation of the esophageal mucosa by acidic or nonacidic refluxate may lead to a constant slight stimulation of cough receptors in the airways (probably via local neurohumoral connections). Thus, some subthreshold external cough stimuli may become a threshold stimulus strong enough to induce cough. Fundoplication restores normal anatomic and physiologic status and likely leads to a situation where the cough reflex is being stimulated occasionally by some trigger such as constant or recurrent exposure to acid or, in some cases, by irritation of the esophageal mucosa by nonacidic refluxate. (27)

Manuscript received July 8, 2004; revision accepted May 11, 2005.

REFERENCES

(1) Irwin RS, Boulet LP, Cloutier MM, et al. Managing cough as a defense mechanism and as a symptom: a consensus panel report of the American College of Chest Physicians. Chest 1998; 114:133S-181S

(2) Irwin RS, French CL, Curley FJ, et al. Chronic cough due to gastroesophageal reflux: clinical, diagnostic, and pathogenetic aspects. Chest 1993; 104:1511-1517

(3) Ekstrom T, Lindgren BR, Tibbling L. Effects of ranitidine treatment on patients with asthma and a history of gastrooesophageal reflux: a double blind crossover study. Thorax 1989; 44:19-23

(4) Irwin RS, Madison JM. Diagnosis and treatment of chronic cough due to gastroesophageal reflux disease and postnasal drip syndrome. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2002; 15:261-266

(5) Novitsky YW, Zawacki JK, Irwin RS et al. Chronic cough due to gastroesophageal reflux disease: efficacy of antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 2002; 16:567-571

(6) Patti MG, Arcerito M, Tamburini A et al. Effect of laparoscopic fundoplication on gastroesophageal reflux disease-induced respiratory symptoms. J Gastrointest Surg 2000; 4:143-149

(7) Ziora D, Jarosz W, Dzielicki Jet al. Assessment of cough threshold in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease [in Polish]. Pneumonol Allergol Pol 2003, 71:221-229

(8) Sonnenberg A, Lepsien G, Muller-Lissner SA, et al. When is esophagitis healed? Esophageal endoscopy, histology and function before and after cimetidine treatment. Dig Dis Sci 1982; 27:297-302

(9) Irwin RS, Zawacki JK, Wilson MM, et al. Chronic cough due to gastroesophageal reflux disease: failure to resolve despite total/near-total elimination of esophageal acid. Chest 2002; 121:1132-1140

(10) Irwin RS, Madison JM. Anatomical diagnostic protocol in evaluating chronic cough with specific reference to gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Med 2000; 108(Suppl4a): 126S-130S

(11) Quanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes JE, et al. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows: Report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Steel and Coal; Official Statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J Suppl 1993; 16:5-40

(12) McKernan JB. Laparoscopic repair of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Toupet partial fundoplication versus Nissen fundoplication. Surg Endosc 1994; 8:851-856

(13) Eubanks WS, Swanstrom LL, Soper NJ. Laparoscopic partial fundoplication. In: Finley RJ, Graham AJ, eds. Mastery of endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott & Wilkins, 2000; 155-164

(14) Chang AB, Newman RG, Carlin JB, et al. Subjective scoring of cough in children: parent-completed vs child-completed diary cards vs an objective method. Eur Respir J 1998; 11:462-466

(15) Auffarth B, de Monchy JG, van der Mark TW, et al. Citric acid cough threshold and airway responsiveness in asthmatic patients and smokers with chronic airflow obstruction. Thorax 1991; 46:638-642

(16) Benini L, Ferrari M, Sembenini C, et al. Cough threshold in reflux oesophagitis: influence of acid and of laryngeal and oesophageal damage. Gut 2000; 46:762-767

(17) Ferrari M, Olivieri M, Sembenini C, et al. Tussive effect of capsaicin in patients with gastroesophageal reflux without cough. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 151:557-561

(18) Morice AH, Higgins KS, Yeo WW. Adaptation of cough reflex with different types of stimulation. Eur Respir J 1992; 5:841-847

(19) Bretagnol F, Giraudeau B, Mor C, et al. Laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: retrospective study of functional results in 243 patients. Ann Chir 2002; 127:181-187

(20) Granderath FA, Kamolz T, Schweiger UM, et al. Quality of life and symptomatic outcome three to five years after laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with impaired esophageal motility. Am J Surg 2002; 183:110-116

(21) Larrain A, Carrasco E, Galleguillos F, et al. Medical and surgical treatment of nonallergic asthma associated with gastroesophageal reflux. Chest 1991; 99:1330-1335

(22) Pessaux P, Arnaud JP, Ghavami B, et al. Morbidity of laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux: a retrospective study about 1470 patients. Hepatogastroenterology 2002; 49:447-450

(23) Spechler SJ, Lee E, Ahnen DM, et al. Long-term outcome of medical and surgical therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001; 285:2331-2338

(24) Zornig C, Strate U, Fibbe C, et al. Nissen vs Toupet laparoscopic fundoplication. Surg Endosc 2002; 16:758-766

(25) Irwin RS, French CT, Fletcher KE. Quality of life in coughers. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2002; 15:283-286

(26) Tibbling L, Gibellino FM, Johansson KE. Is mis-swallowing or smoking a cause of respiratory symptoms in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease? Dysphagia 1995; 10:113-116

(27) Irwin RS, Madison JM, Fraire AE. The cough reflex and its relation to gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Med 2000; 108(Suppl 4a):73S-78S

(28) Dicpinigatis PV, Rauf K. The influence of gender on cough reflex sensitivity. Chest 1998; 113:1319-1321

(29) Kastelik JA, Thompson R, Aziz I, et al. Gender related differences in cough reflex sensitivity in patients with chronic cough. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 166:961-964

Dariusz Ziora, MD, PhD; Wojciech Jarosz, MD; Jozef Dzielicki, MD; Jacek Ciekalski, MD; Andrzej Krzywiecki, MD, FCCP; Szymon Dworniczak, MD; and Jerzy Kozielski, MD, PhD, FCCP

* From the Department of Lung Diseases and Tuberculosis (Drs. Ziora, Krzywiecki, Dworniczak, and Kozielski) and Laparoscopic Surgery Center (Drs. Dzielicki and Ciekalski), Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze; and Municipal Hospital of Pulmonary Diseases (Dr. Jarosz), Chorzow, Poland.

This work was performed at the Department of Lung Diseases and Tuberculosis, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice.

Correspondence to: Dariusz Ziora, MD, PhD, Department of Lung Diseases and Tuberculosis, Medical University of Silesia, 41-803 Zabrze, Koziolka 1, Poland; e-mail: ftpulmza@slam. katowice.pl

COPYRIGHT 2005 American College of Chest Physicians
COPYRIGHT 2005 Gale Group

Return to Gastroesophageal reflux disease
Home Contact Resources Exchange Links ebay