ABSTRACT
Toxoplasma gondii is an important opportunistic infection among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients as it causes fatal encephalitis. In the present study, antibody response to T. gondii is assessed in saliva samples from 100 HIV-seropositive patients and 25 HIV-negative healthy controls by indirect enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Sensitivity and specificity for detection of IgG and IgM in saliva is calculated using a positive antibody response in serum samples (from an earlier study) as the gold standard. IgG and IgM antibodies were found in 20% and 25% patients, respectively. One control subject showed the presence of IgM antibody. Sensitivity for IgG and IgM antibodies was 64% and 81.25%, respectively, while specificity was 94.67% and 85.71%, respectively. This study indicates that saliva samples can be used as an alternative to serum samples to detect anti-toxoplasma antibodies, particularly IgM, for the diagnosis of toxoplasma encephalitis in HIV/acquired immune deficiency syndrome patients.
KEY WORDS: Antibody. Saliva. Toxoplasma gondii.
Introduction
Toxoplasmosis is an important opportunistic infection among individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). At present, more than 40 million people worldwide are infected with HIV and 1400 people become infected each day. In India there are 3.82-4.58 million individuals with HIV infection.1
Patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) are at high risk of developing toxoplasma encephalitis, as in 95% of cases it is due to reactivation of latent infection. However, it can also occur as a result of the acquisition of parasites from exogenous sources such as blood or transplanted organs.2
The incidence of toxoplasma encephalitis (TE) is directly related to the prevalence of HIV infection and anti-toxoplasma antibodies in the general population.3 In India, the seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis is reported to be 1.5-22%,4-6 and up to 57% in Uttar Pradesh.7 Toxoplasma encephalitis occurs in nearly 50% of HIV patients with anti-toxoplasma antibodies; thus, early diagnosis of at-risk patients is imperative.8
Diagnosis of toxoplasmosis can be achieved by the demonstration of parasites in tissue samples, parasite isolation by culture techniques,9 mouse inoculation,10 serological methods such as antibody8 or antigen detection11 and molecular techniques such as the polymerase chain reaction (PCR).12
Although amplification of specific toxoplasma DNA sequences by a PCR technique may prove useful in the diagnosis of individuals co-infected with HIV and toxoplasmosis,12,13 the problem of standardisation and non-availability in all hospitals has hampered its use in routine diagnosis. Moreover, the sensitivity of PCR has proved controversial.13-18
Furthermore, the demonstration of parasites in clinical samples requires expertise and facilities for parasite isolation are not available at most peripheral hospitals. Thus, the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis depends largely on serological evidence.
Serodiagnostic techniques for the detection of specific antibody responses are simple, non-invasive approaches that are useful in the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis in immunocompetent individuals. Reports on antibody response to Toxoplasma gondii in serum samples of HIV-infected individuals indicate that 12-67% show an IgG antibody response, while IgM antibodies are present in up to 16% patients.19-22
Interest in the use of oral fluids for the diagnosis of microbial disease in HIV cases23 was initiated in 1986, and similar approaches were used subsequently for the diagnosis of parasitic diseases such as schistosomiasis,24 neurocysticercosis,25 amoebic liver disease,26,27 trypanosomiasis28 and intestinal helminthiasis.29 Antibodies can be detected in oral fluids because they transudate from serum to the oral cavity through the crevicular fluid that is released via the gingival crevice.30
Few studies have been undertaken to evaluate the usefulness of saliva samples in the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis.31,32 Moreover, these have been carried out largely in immunocompetent individuals; the one exception being the study of Amato Neto et al.,33 who attempted T. gondii isolation in saliva samples from 26 AIDS patients. However, none of the samples was found to be positive. Saliva collection is easy, non-invasive and can be used for large epidemiological surveys. A previous study20 reported a higher prevalence of toxoplasma antibodies in sera of HIV-infected patients than in that from healthy subjects. Thus, the present study aims to detect IgG and IgM antibody responses to T. gondii in saliva samples from HIV-positive patients and to assess whether or not saliva samples can be used as an alternative to serum samples for the early diagnosis of toxoplasmosis in HIV patients.
Materials and methods
Subjects and samples
One hundred HIV-seropositive individuals attending Nehru Hospital, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India, between February and December 2001 were included in the study, all of whom gave advised consent. Twenty-five normal healthy individuals who were seronegative for HIV by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique acted as the control group.
Samples (1 mL) of unstimulated saliva were collected from all subjects. Immediately after collection, protease inhibitors, aprotinin (Sigma)29 and pepstatin A (Sigma) were added at a final concentration for each of 2 µg/mL saliva. Samples were kept on ice until centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 15 min at 4°C.34 Undiluted saliva and serum samples were stored at -20°C.
Antigen preparation
The RH strain of T. gondii maintained in Swiss albino mice was used to prepare the antigen.35 Tachyzoites harvested from the peritoneal cavity of mice infected three days earlier were washed (x2) in 10 mmol/E phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2). Following centrifugation, the pellet was resuspended in distilled water. The parasites were disrupted by sonication for 1 min in an ultrasonic disintegrator (SONIPREP) and then centrifuged at 10,000 xg for 60 min. The supernatant was used as a soluble antigen. Protein content was estimated36 and antigen was stored in aliquots at -20°C. This antigen was used to coat the wells of an ELISA microtitre plate.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
An ELISA technique to detect anti-toxoplasma IgG and IgM antibodies was carried out following the method of Voiler et al.,37 but with slight modification. Briefly, the optimum dilutions of antigen and saliva samples were determined by a checkerboard titration method. Each well of a microtitre plate was coated by overnight incubation at 4°C with 100 µL antigen (predetermined optimum dilution: 1 µg/well). After washing (x3) with PBS-Tween (PBS-T), the wells were blocked with 2% bovine serum albumin and the plate incubated at 37° C for 1 h. This was followed by washing (x3) in PBS-T and the addition of 100 µL undiluted saliva to each well. The plate was incubated at 37°C for 1 h, washed in PBS-T and then 100 µL horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labelled antihuman IgG (1 in 4500 dilution; Dakopatts, Denmark) or HRP-labelled antihuman IgM (I in 1000 dilution; Dakopatts) was added to each well. The plate was incubated at 37°C for 1 h, washed in PBS-T and then 100 µL substrate solution comprising orthophenylene diamine (OPD) and hydrogen peroxide was added to each well. All plates were kept at room temperature for 15 min and the enzyme-substrate reaction was stopped with 1 mol/L sulphuric acid. Absorbance (A) was read in an automated ELISA reader (Eurogenetics A4, Tessenderle, Belgium) at 492 nm.
Each sample was assayed in duplicate and the mean A value calculated. Positive controls were saliva samples from toxoplasmosis patients with a high serum antibody titre (>1:1600). Negative controls were saliva samples from normal healthy individuals with undetectable serum IgG and IgM antibody responses to T. gondii. Five positive and five negative samples were included in each plate, as were substrate and buffer blanks.
Statistical analysis
Cut-off A value for a positive result was determined by adding two standard deviations (2SD) to the mean A value of five negative control samples. Samples with an A value greater or equal to the cut-off A value were regarded as positive. Results were compared between patient and control groups and evaluated by the χ^sup 2^ test.
Results
Sensitivity and specificity for saliva testing was calculated against the results obtained by serology in the same patients. Cut-off A value for positivity of IgG and IgM antibodies in saliva samples was 0.194 and 0.258, respectively.
In 100 HIV positive patients, anti-toxoplasma IgG and IgM antibody response was detected in 20% and 25% patients, respectively. All control subjects were negative for IgG antibodies but one subject showed the presence of IgM antibody; however, the A value of this saliva sample was equal to the cut-off value (0.258). The difference in positive response between the patient and control groups was statistically significant (P
The full anti-toxoplasma antibody profile can be seen in Table 1.
Discussion
Detection of antibodies may help to assess the risk of developing cerebral toxoplasmosis in HIV-positive patient, as this complication occurs in 25-50% of individuals who have anti-toxoplasma antibodies.20 Although studies have been undertaken19-22 on the seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis in HIV/AIDS patients, the use of saliva samples as an alternative means of diagnosis has not been investigated.
Antibody detection in saliva samples has been used in many parasitic diseases. Its advantages include easier, noninvasive sampling and the fact that it can also be used for large epidemiological surveys. Hajeer et al.31 analysed saliva samples from 27 patients with recent toxoplasmosis for specific IgG and IgM antibodies to T. gondii and found that 13/27 saliva samples were positive for IgG antibodies by direct agglutination test and 8/27 were positive for IgM by immunosorbent agglutination assay. The authors suggest that IgG and IgM in saliva are potentially useful markers of acute toxoplasmosis.
Loyola et al.32 tested serum and saliva from 60 individuals for IgG and IgA antitoxoplasma antibodies. They detected IgG antibodies in 43 (71.7%) serum samples and in 12 (20%) saliva samples, and also detected IgA antibodies in 18 (30%) serum samples and 12 (20%) saliva samples. The authors conclude that the detection of salivary IgA reflects the serum level of this isotype, while salivary IgG does not.
However, only one study has used saliva samples to diagnose toxoplasmosis in AIDS patients.33 In the study of 26 patients, including six with computed tomography imaging evidence suggesting cerebral abscess caused by T. gondii, the authors attempted to isolate parasites in saliva in patients with AIDS. They were unable to detect parasites in saliva using a mouse inoculation model, but did not attempt anti-toxoplasma antibody detection in saliva.
In the present study, anti-toxoplasma IgG and IgM antibody response was seen in 25% and 20% patients in saliva. In an earlier study by the same group, serum samples from the same subjects were analysed for the presence of IgG and IgM antibodies. The sensitivity and specificity for detection of these antibodies in saliva were calculated using serology as the gold standard (Tables 2 and 3).
The higher positivity for IgG in serum compared to saliva may be due to the fact that IgG antibodies are a transudate from serum to the oral cavity. The higher level of IgM positivity in saliva samples compared to serum samples can be attributed to the fact that IgM is a secretory immunoglobulin.18 It is also possible that circulating antigen formed complexes with the high levels of circulating IgM, resulting in the detection of less free IgM.
Serum samples from the patients included in the present study were analysed previously for the presence of antigen. Of the 12 patients with IgM antibodies in their saliva but not in serum, antigenaemia was demonstrated in five, indicating acute infection in these patients. However, the possibility of a false-positive reaction cannot be ruled out in the remaining seven patients. In the present study, 37% of patients showed IgG or IgM in serum and/or saliva samples. These patients may be at high risk of developing toxoplasma encephalitis and should be considered for prophylactic anti-toxoplasma therapy.
The results of this study suggest that saliva samples can be used as an alternative to serum samples for detection of anti-toxoplasma antibodies in situations where serum collection is not possible or may be difficult, as in the case of large epidemiological studies. However, further studies involving larger number of subjects need to be carried out to confirm the present observations.
The authors wish to thank Mrs. Gurjeet Bhatti, Mr. Rajpal and Mrs. Praveen for their excellent technical assistance.
References
1 National AIDS Control Organisation. HIV/AIDS surveillance in India, 1 December 2003. www.naco.nic.in//indiascene/esthiv.htm.
2 Renoult E, Georges E, Biava MF et al. Toxoplasmosis in kidney transplant recipients: report of six cases and review. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 24: 625-34.
3 Luft BJ, Remington JS. Toxoplasmic encephalitis. J Infect Dis 1988; 157: 1-6.
4 Neogi DK, Ganguly U, Banerjee SK, Gangopadhyay B. Prevalence of toxoplasmosis in Calcutta and suburbs -a hospital-based study for three years. Indian J Public Health 1996; 40: 17-9.
5 Joshi YR, Vyas S, Joshi KR. Seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis in Jodhpur, India. J Commun Dis 1998; 30: 32-7.
6 Mohan B, Dubey ML, Malla N, Kumar R. Seroepidemiological study of toxoplasmosis in different sections of population of Union Territory of Chandigarh. J Commun Dis 2002; 34: 15-22.
7 Singh S, Nautiyal BL. Seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis in Kumaon region of India. Indian J Med Res 1991; 93: 247-9.
8 Nascimento LV, Stollar F, Tavares LV et al. Risk factor for toxoplasmic encephalitis in HIV-infected patients: a case control study in Brazil. Ann Trop Med Parasitai 2001; 95: 587-93.
9 James GS, Sintchenko VG, Dickeson DJ, Gilbert GL. Comparison of cell culture, mouse inoculation and PCR for detection of Toxoplasma gondii: effects of storage condition on sensitivity. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34: 1572-5.
10 Hitt JA, Filice GA. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii parasitaemia by gene amplification, cell culture and mouse inoculaton. J Clin Microbiol 1992; 30: 3181-1.
11 Rodriguez JC, Martinez MM, Martinez AR, Royo G. Evaluation of different techniques in the diagnosis of toxoplasma encephalitis. J Med Microbiol 1997; 46: 597-601.
12 Dupon M, Cazenave J, Pellegrin JL et al. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii by PCR and tissue culture in cerebrospinal fluid and blood of human immunodeficiency virus-seropositive patients. J Clin Microbiol 1995; 33: 2421-6.
13 Franzen C, Altfeld M, Hegenes P, Hartmann P, Arendt G, Jablonowski H. Limited value of PCR for detection of Toxoplasma gondii in blood from immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. J Clin Microbiol 1997; 35: 2639-41.
14 HoYen DO, Joss AWL, Balfour AH, Smyth ETM, Baird D, Chatterton JMW. Use of polymerase chain reaction to detect Toxoplasma gondii in human blood samples. J Clin Pathol 1992; 45: 910-3.
15 Filice GA, Hitt JA, Mitchell CD, Blackstad M, Sorensen SW. Diagnosis of toxoplasma parasitaemia in patients with AIDS by gene detection after amplification with polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31: 2327-31.
16 Johnson JD, Butcher BD, Savva D, Holliman RE. Application of the polymerase chain reaction to the diagnosis of human toxoplasmosis. J Infect 1993; 26: 147-58.
17 DupouyCamet J, Desouza SL, Maslo C, Paugam A, Saimot AG, Benarous R. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii in venous blood from AIDS patients by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31: 1866-9.
18 Khalifa KES, Roth A, Roth B, Arasteh KN, Janitschke K. Value of PCR for evaluating occurrence of parasitaemia in immunocompromised patients with cerebral and extracerebral toxoplasmosis. J Clin Microbiol 1994; 32: 2813-9.
19 Clerio DD, Henry MC, Lokombe B. Serological observations on toxoplasmosis in Zairian AIDS patients. Trails R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1986; 80: 613-4.
20 Meisheri YV, Mehta S, Patel U. A prospective study of seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis in general population and in HIV/AIDS patients in Bombay, India. J Postgrad Med 1997; 43: 93-7.
21 Nissapatorn V, Lee C, Quek KF, Leong CL, Mahmud R, Abdullah KA. Toxoplasmosis in HIV/AIDS patients: a current situation. Jpn J Infect Dis 2004; 57: 160-5.
22 Malla N, Sengupta C, Dubey ML, Sud A, Dutta U. Antigenaemia and antibody response to Toxoplasma gondii in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Br J Biomed Sci 2005; 62: 19-23.
23 Archibald DW, Zon LI, Groopman JE, Allan JS, McLane MF, Essex ME. Salivary antibodies as a means of detecting human T-cell lymphotropic virus type III/lymphadenopathy-associated virus infection. J Clin Microbiol 1986; 24: 873-5.
24 Monica MA, Santos G, Garcia TC et al. Oral fluids for the immunodiagnosis of Schistosoma mansoni infection. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2000; 94: 280-92.
25 Feldman M, Piancarte A, Sandovai M, Wilson M, Plisser A. Comparison of two asssays (EIA and EITB) and two samples (saliva and serum) for the diagnosis of neurocysticercosis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1990; 84: 559-62.
26 Muro RD, Acosta E, Marino E, Glender W, Libraro Ortiz. Diagnosis of intestinal amoebiasis using salivary IgA antibody detection. J Infect Dis 1990; 162: 1360-4.
27 Punthuprapasa P, Thammapalerd N, Chularerk U, Charoenlarp K, Bhaibulaya M. Diagnosis of intestinal amebiasis using salivary IgA antibody detection. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2001; 32: 159-64.
28 Lejon V, Kwete J, Biischer P Towards saliva-based screening for sleeping sickness? Trop Med Int Health 2003; 8: 585.
29 Needham CS, Lillywhite JE, Beasley NMR, Didier JM, Kihamia CM, Bundy DA. Potential for diagnosis of intestinal nematode infections through antibody detection in saliva. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1996; 90: 526-30.
30 Mason DK, Chileson DM. Saliva: general review and physical properties. In: Mason DK, Chileson DM, eds. Salivary glands in health and disease New York: WB Saunders, 1975: 37-69.
31 Amato Neto V, Braz LM, Jamra LM, Higaki Y, Pasternak J. Isolation of Toxoplasma gondii from the saliva of patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) Rev Hasp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 1990; 45: 171-2.
32 Hajeer AH, Balfour, Mostratos A, Crosse B. Toxoplasma gondii: detection of antibodies in human saliva and serum. Parasite Immunol 1994; 16: 43-50.
33 Loyola AM, Durighetto AF Jr, Suva DA, Mineo JR. Anti-Toxoplasma gondii immunoglobulins A and G in human saliva and serum. J Oral Pathol Med 1997; 26: 187-91.
34 Olveira SA, Siqueria MM, Brown DWG, Camacho LAB, Faillace Cohen BJ. Salivary diagnosis of measles for surveillance: a clinic-based study in Niteroi, State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1998; 92: 636-8.
35 Sharma P, Gupta I, Ganguly NK, Mahajan RC, Malla N. Increasing toxoplasma seropositivity in women with bad obstetric history and in newborns. Nat Med J India 1997; 10: 65-6.
36 Lowry DH, Rosenbrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RH. Protein measurement with Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1951; 193: 265-75.
37 Voiler A. Enzyme immunoassays for parasitic diseases. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1976; 70: 98-106.
38 Warren S, Ivan JF. The mucosal immune system. In: Stites DP Terr AI, Parslow TG, eds. Medical immunology (9th edn). Connecticut: Appleton & Lange, 1997: 196-210.
M. R SINGH, M.L DUBEY, A SUD* and N. MALLA
Departments of Parasitology and * Internal Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh-160012, India
Accepted: 28 March 2005
Correspondence to: Dr. M. L. Dubey
Department of Parasitology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh-160012, India.
Email: mldubey@sify.com
Copyright Step Publishing Ltd. 2005
Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights Reserved