The dramatic increase in cocaine use over the past decade is due largely to the increased availability and popularity of smoked freebase or crack cocaine.[1] Freebase or crack is an alkaloidal form of cocaine that is heat stable and evaporates at a high temperature, allowing it to be smoked. Different methods exist for smoking, but the most common involve use of a heated pipe or mixing cocaine with tobacco or marijuana in a cigarette form.[2,3] When smoked, cocaine is readily absorbed through the pulmonary circulation and reaches the CNS within seconds.[4,5] Thus, the euphoric effect is nearly instantaneous and easily attained, rendering crack cocaine a frequently desired and abused substance. Although toxicity is often attributed to CNS or cardiovascular side effects, cocaine in crack form is also associated with a number of pulmonary complications, as recently reviewed by Haim et al.[6] These complications are associated with a variety of pulmonary pathologic changes, including noncardiogenic pulmonary edema, acute and chronic alveolar hemorrhage, diffuse alveolar damage, interstitial pneumonitis, and pulmonary fibrosis.[7,8] The potential of crack cocaine to cause chronic lung injury is also supported by findings of diffusion impairment and evidence of increased alveolar epithelial permeability among habitual users of crack cocaine.[9,10]
The causes underlying these pulmonary complications are probably multifactorial. However, we considered the possibility that crack cocaine might acutely activate inflammatory cells known to be involved in lung injury. To evaluate this possibility, we examined the short-term effect of in vivo administration of inhaled or IV cocaine on the activity of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) derived from the peripheral blood of habitual crack users. PMN activation was assessed using assays that measure cell-mediated antimicrobial and tumoricidal activities, as well as the production of interleukin 8 (IL-8). IL-8 is one of the few cytokines produced by activated PMNs, and it acts both as an attractant and activator for these inflammatory cells.[11] Our results indicate that short-term exposure to cocaine in vivo induces an inflammatory state by activating the effector function of PMNs and their ability to produce IL-8. These short-term effects may therefore prove to be relevant to the pulmonary complications that develop in long-term cocaine users.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Subjects
Twenty-four current crack-smoking subjects, including 17 men and 7 women, were recruited from a cohort of crack smokers participating in ongoing studies[9,12] of the pulmonary effects of habitual use of cocaine, as well as from chemical dependency treatment programs in the local community. All subjects were between the ages of 21 and 50 years, and were regular smokers of alkaloidal cocaine, with only limited use of IV cocaine ([is less than or equal to] 12 times per lifetime). Exclusionary criteria, described in detail previously,[12] included but were not limited to the following: IV drug abuse (including IV administered cocaine) [is greater than] 12 times per lifetime or within the previous year; history of smoking ([is greater than] 20 fumes per lifetime) other illicit substances except cannabis (eg, phencyclidine, heroin, opium, methamphetamine); and history of chronic lung disease (eg, asthma, interstitial lung disease). All subjects tested negative for HIV. Eligible volunteers were studied after signing informed consent forms approved by the UCLA School of Medicine Human Subject Protection Committee and the West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center Human Studies Committee.
Procedures
Preliminary examination procedures included a detailed respiratory and drug use questionnaire (modified from the American Thoracic Society/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute respiratory questionnaire[13] and National Institute on Drug Abuse National Survey on Drug Abuse[14]), medical history and physical examination, urine drug screen, 12-lead ECG, spirometry and single-breath diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide measurement, blood test for pseudocholinesterase deficiency, and a urine pregnancy test in female subjects. Following completion of these procedures, eligible volunteers were studied on 2 to 4 separate days 1 to 2 weeks apart, beginning at approximately 8 AM. Subjects were to have refrained from smoking cocaine or marijuana, taking any prescription or over-the-counter medication, or consuming any caffeine-containing beverage for at least 8 h. In addition, subjects were admonished not to smoke tobacco for at least 2 h before testing or to use any antihistamine preparation for at least 48 h. Studies were performed with a physician in attendance and an emergency crash cart nearby.
On each study day, the amount of daily drug use (crack cocaine, marijuana, tobacco) during the preceding week and the time of last use were ascertained by questionnaire, and a urine sample was obtained for determination of cocaine metabolite (benzoylecgonine [BE]). Venous blood sampling occurred before and after (1) IV administration over 30 s of cocaine HCl (0.35 to 0.5 mg/kg) or an equivalent volume of saline solution, or (2) smoking of cocaine base (45 mg) or placebo (cocaine base in a subphysiologic dose, 4.5 mg), using a previously described smoking device.[12] The peripheral IV catheter for injection of cocaine HCl or saline solution was inserted in the arm opposite to that used for repeated blood sampling. Ten-milliliter samples of blood were obtained from the venous catheter before and 10 to 45 min after injection or inhalation of cocaine or placebo; the blood samples were withdrawn into evacuated specimen tubes (Vacutainer; Becton Dickinson; Franklin Lakes, NJ) with sodium heparin and held at room temperature until completion of the study and eventual isolation of PMNs and monocytes. Immediately following blood collection for functional assays, an additional blood sample was collected in another evacuated tube containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, for determination of blood cocaine and metabolite levels.
Purification of Primary Cells From Peripheral Blood
PMNs were isolated from peripheral blood by Ficoll-Hypaque (Pharmacia Biotech AB; Uppsala, Sweden) gradient centrifugation, followed by dextran sedimentation as previously described.[15] Cells were used immediately in cytotoxicity assays and the IL-8 supernatant collection assays. Pretreatment and post-treatment samples were assayed simultaneously to reduce inter-assay variability.
PMN Phagocytosis Assay
PMNs were purified for use in both phagocytosis and intracellular killing assays according to the previously described methods.[16] Briefly, at appropriate times (T=5, 15, and 30 min), 0.2 mL of the PMNs ([10.sup.6] cells/mL) and Staphylococcus aureus (10[8] bacteria/mL) suspension was removed and combined with 0.2 mL 0.25% N-ethyl maleimide (Sigma; St. Louis) in Hanks' balanced salt solution, which inhibited additional phagocytosis. Samples (0.05 mL) were removed and cytocentrifuge slides were prepared, fixed, stained, and examined by light microscopy. Individual PMNs were evaluated as having either 0, 1 to 10, 11 to 20, 21 to 30, or [is greater than] 30 bacteria associated with them. A weighted phagocytic index was calculated by multiplying the number of PMNs in each category by 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4, respectively, and dividing the total score by the number of PMNs examined ([is greater than or equal to] 100).
PMN Intracellular Killing
PMNs ([10.sup.6] cells) were resuspended in 0.9 mL Hanks' balanced salt solution containing 10% human AB serum and allowed to warm to 37 [degrees] C for 5 min, following which, 0.1 mL of S aureus was added at a 1:1 ratio ([10.sup.6] organisms). Reaction tubes were incubated with rocking at 37 [degrees] C, and at the appropriate time-points (T=0, 30, 60, and 90 min), 0.1 mL of the cell/bacteria suspensions was removed, serially diluted in water, and plated in duplicate on trypticase soy agar. Plates were incubated at 37 [degrees] C overnight, and bacterial colonies were counted. Results were either expressed as a direct ratio ([N.sub.t]/[N.sub.0]), where [N.sub.0]=number of colonies counted at initial combination of cells and bacteria and [N.sub.t]=number of colonies at each time interval, or as percent killing ([[N.sub.0] - N]/[N.sub.0] x 100).
PMN Antibody-Dependent Cell-Mediated Cytotoxicity Assay
PMN cytotoxicity was assayed as previously described.[17] Briefly, following isolation from peripheral blood, PMNs were washed and stimulated in the presence of 100 picomolar granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF; Genetic Institute; Boston). M14 melanoma tumor target cells were radioactively labeled by incubating 1.8 to 2.0 x [10.sup.7] cells in 1.5 mL of cytotoxic medium containing 0.3 mL [Na.sup.51]Cr[O.sub.4] (1 [micro]Ci=37 GBq; New England Nuclear) for 90 min at 37 [degrees] C. Following incubation, target cells were washed and incubated in the presence of monoclonal antibody 14G2A[17] (0.5 [micro]g per well), and plated at a concentration of 3x[10.sup.4] cells per well in a 96-well polystyrene flat-bottom plate. An equal volume of prepared PMNs (3x[10.sup.6]) was added to the wells, resulting in an effector/ target cell ratio of 100:1 and a final well volume of 0.3 mL. The plates were centrifuged at 200g for 7 min and incubated for 3 h at 37 [degrees] C in a humidified atmosphere (5% [CO.sub.2] in air). After incubation, 0.15 mL of supernatant was removed and counted in a gamma counter.
Percent lysis was calculated as (A-B)/Cx100, in which A represents the mean counts per minute (cpm) in the supernatant from wells containing target and effector cells, B is the mean cpm from wells containing target cells alone (representing spontaneous release of [sub.51]Cr), and C is the total cpm added to each well. Assays were run in triplicate.
PMN Supernatant Collection and Quantitation of IL-8 Production
Peripheral blood-derived PMNs were isolated from study subjects and normal donors as previously described, washed and resuspended in iscoves modified dulbeccos medium (IMDM; Gibco; Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 2 mmol/L glutamine/penicillin (100 mg/mL)/streptomycin (100 mg/mL) and plated (4x[10.sup.6] cells per well) in 48-well plastic plates (Corning Costar Corp; Cambridge, Mass). Recombinant human IL-2 (10,000 U/mL, Boehringer Mannheim; Indianapolis) was added to wells at a final concentration of 1,000 U/mL. PMNs were incubated for 3 h at 37 [degrees] C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% [CO.sub.2] in air. At T=0, 1, and 3 h, 0.250 mL of the supernatant was harvested to sterile tubes and centrifuged (1,000g) for 5 min. The supernatant was then stored at -80 [degrees] C for time periods that did not exceed 1 month, and subsequently utilized in an IL-8 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (R & D Systems; Minneapolis) was used to determine IL-8 levels in supernatants collected from PMNs incubated in the presence or absence of IL-2. Procedures described by the manufacturer were strictly followed without alteration.
RESULTS
Subject Characteristics.
Demographic and smoking characteristics of the 24 study subjects are shown in Table 1. Subjects were in their fourth to fifth decade of life, and reported current smoking of at least 0.2 g (mean= 13 g) of crack cocaine per week, with a duration of smoking of at least 3 years. Approximately two thirds of the subjects also currently smoked tobacco and/or marijuana.
[Figure 4 ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
DISCUSSION
The mechanisms by which crack cocaine injures the lung are not well defined. However, the frequent autopsy findings of diffuse alveolar damage, interstitial pneumonitis, and pulmonary fibrosis in crack users suggest that both acute and chronic inflammatory reactions are involved.[6-8] The present study was designed to assess the effects of short-term cocaine exposure on circulating inflammatory cells. Our findings suggest that short-term exposure to cocaine, either by inhalation or the IV route, activates circulating PMNs. In measuring PMN function, we first evaluated the intracellular killing of ingested S aureus. In this assay, antibacterial killing is a cumulative measure of phagocytosis, phagolysosomal fusion, and the production of both oxidative and nonoxidative metabolites.[18] PMNs collected 10 to 45 min after the administration of cocaine demonstrated significantly enhanced antibacterial activity compared with PMNs collected from the same subjects before the exposure. The validity of these results is supported by the fact that antibacterial activity did not significantly change from baseline in the same subjects when they were administered placebo instead of cocaine. Likewise, we observed the same trend toward cellular activation when we measured PMN-mediated tumor cell killing in an ADCC assay. This assay measures a nonoxidative mode of killing mediated through Fc receptor binding and release of inflammatory cytokines.[19] Finally, as an additional correlate of PMN activation, we measured release of IL-8, a potent inflammatory mediator involved in neutrophil chemotaxis and activation.[11] We found that short-term exposure to cocaine primed stimulated PMNs to release enhanced levels of IL-8. Although we failed to find a significant correlation between the observed changes in plasma cocaine levels and changes in functional assays, this may likely be explained by delays in blood sampling. Venous plasma levels of cocaine reach a peak within 2 min after administration, and its clearance is quite variable, depending primarily on the subject's circulating pseudocholinesterase activity.[20] This generally occurs within a few minutes, due to tissue uptake and metabolism. In our study, plasma cocaine sampling was delayed an average of 27.0 [+ or -] 12.6 min postadministration, because physiologic experiments performed during the period immediately following cocaine administration prevented earlier sampling.
Results presented herein support the conclusion that in vivo exposure to cocaine induces an acute inflammatory response. Although the systemic activation we observed was relatively modest, it is realistic to hypothesize that effects within the pulmonary microenvironment of crack abusers are more pronounced. First, the amounts of cocaine administered in our study, 20 to 45 ma, were small compared with the usual 1 to 4 g/wk consumption of our subjects. This was confirmed by the relatively low levels of cocaine that could be measured in the blood an average of 27 min after experimental administration. In addition, pulmonary parenchymal concentrations are likely to be substantially greater than that in the systemic circulation, due to direct exposure of the lung to the inhaled drug. For example, studies in tobacco smokers have demonstrated significantly higher acute concentrations of nicotine in arterial blood compared with simultaneous venous sampling (D.P.L. Sachs, personal communication, 1996). This is presumably due to dilution and peripheral consumption/metabolism of inhaled substances. The same phenomenon likely exists for cocaine, due to its rapid metabolism by plasma pseudocholinesterase.[19]
Information documenting the pulmonary effects of cocaine comes primarily from autopsy studies performed on individuals dying of a variety of causes, whose toxicology studies were positive for cocaine. The most frequent findings at autopsy were pulmonary edema (in 77%), acute and/or chronic hemorrhage (in 71%), and interstitial pneumonitis and/or fibrosis (in 38%).[7] Injury included variable infiltration by both PMNs and mononuclear cells, as well as evidence of diffuse alveolar damage, fibrosis, and hyperplasia of type II pneumocytes.[7,8] Similar findings have also been reported in patients hospitalized with an acute crack lung syndrome.[21-25] Patients usually present with diffuse pulmonary infiltrates and hypoxemia that respond to corticosteroids and supportive care. Cucco et al[24] performed BAL on one such patient and documented a fourfold increase in protein content, consistent with the presence of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema. Forrester et al[25] reported that transbronchial and/or open lung biopsy specimens also show diffuse alveolar damage and alveolar hemorrhage, as well as interstitial and intra-alveolar inflammatory cell infiltration.
The clinical and pathologic characteristics associated with crack abuse are in many ways similar to those observed both in ARDS and in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Similarity to ARDS strongly suggests a role for PMN activation in the pathogenesis of crack-associated lung injury. PMNs collected from patients with ARDS demonstrate similar signs of activation, including enhanced effector cell function, superoxide production, and release of extracellular elastases and proteases.[26] A role for these activated PMNs in lung injury is also supported by studies in mice, in which experimental ARDS can be induced in normal animals but not in animals that have been rendered neutropenic.[27]
Our observation that cocaine primes PMNs for IL-8 release is also relevant to lung injury. Both acute injury, as in ARDS, and chronic lung injury, as in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, are correlated with elevated circulating intrapulmonary levels of IL-8. Chollet-Martin et al[28] measured IL-8 levels in the plasma and BAL fluid of 18 patients with pneumonia and ARDS, and found elevated levels of IL-8 in the alveolar spaces of all such patients in comparison to IL-8 levels of control subjects without acute lung injury. Other reports also show a direct correlation between plasma levels of IL-8 and PMN infiltration in ARDS patients and in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.[29-31] Lynch et al[32] observed that the intrapulmonary expression of IL-8 messenger RNA correlated directly with the degree of PMN infiltration, as measured in the BAL fluid. Finally, other support for PMNs and IL-8 as acute mediators of lung injury comes from patients treated with systemic IL-2. In these subjects, activated PMNs induced to secrete IL-8 are believed to play a role in the pulmonary endothelial injury and cytokine-associated noncardiogenic edema that complicates this form of immunotherapy.[33]
Given the known roles of PMNs and IL-8 in acute lung injury, our observations suggest a potential mechanism for cocaine-associated lung injury. However, to further understand why some crack users develop crack lung while others do not, it may be necessary to relate this syndrome to the following: intensity, frequency, and recency of exposure; and frequency, route of administration, and possible contributions by other coincident exposures, such as other drugs or viral infections. Herein we have described a short-term exposure study that is limited by the amount of cocaine that can be safely administered, as well as by the lack of direct access to the pulmonary microenvironment at the time of exposure. Therefore, it may be useful to perform bronchoscopy with BAL in subjects following short-term experimental exposure or in patients admitted to hospital with acute manifestations of crack lung. Interestingly, in contrast to PMN activation following short-term exposure, we find that long-term exposure suppresses the immune function of BAL-derived alveolar macrophages (Baldwin et al; unpublished data in manuscript preparation). This suggests that repeated short-term exposure to cocaine may culminate in long-term chronic lung damage. The pathogenesis of pulmonary complications associated with cocaine is undoubtedly multifactorial; our findings, however, support the involvement of PMNs as activated acute inflammatory mediators of lung injury
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: The authors thank Michael Simmons for statistical analysis and figure preparation, and Wendy Aft for preparation of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
[1] Smart RG. Crack cocaine use: a review of prevalence and adverse effects. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1991; 17:13-26
[2] Jatlow PI. Drug of abuse profile--cocaine. Clin Chem 1987; 33:66B-71B
[3] Cregler LL, Mark H. Medical complications of cocaine. N Engl J Med 1986; 315:1495-1500
[4] Ettinger NA, Albin RJ. A review of the respiratory effects of smoking cocaine. Am J Med 1989; 87:664-68
[5] Warner E. Cocaine abuse. Arch Intern Med 1993; 153:226-35
[6] Haim DY, Lippmann ML, Goldberg SK, et al. The pulmonary complications of crack cocaine: a comprehensive review. Chest 1995; 107:233-40
[7] Bailey ME, Fraire AK, Greenberg SD, et al. Pulmonary histopathology in cocaine abusers. Hum Pathol 1994; 25: 203-07
[8] Laposata EA, Mayo GL. A review of pulmonary pathology and mechanisms associated with inhalation of freebase cocaine (`crack'). Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1993; 14:1-9
[9] Tashkin DP, Khalsa M-E, Gorelick D, et al. Pulmonary status of habitual cocaine smokers. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992; 145:92-100
[10] Susskind H, Weber DA, Volkow ND, et al. Increased lung permeability following long-term use of free-base cocaine (crack). Chest 1991; 100:903-09
[11] Djeu JY, Matsushima K, Oppenheim JJ, et al. Functional activation of human neutrophils by recombinant monocyte-derived neutrophil chemotactic factor/IL-8. J Immunol 1990; 144:2205-10
[12] Tashkin DP, Kleerup EC, Koyal SN, et al. Acute effects of inhaled intravenous cocaine on airway dynamics. Chest (in press)
[13] Ferris BG. Epidemiology standardization project. Am Rev Respir Dis 1978; 118/6 (pt 2):1-88
[14] Fishburne PM, Abelson HI, Cisin I. National survey on drug abuse: main findings. Rockville, Md: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1980; DDHS 80-976
[15] Boyum A. Isolation of lymphocytes, granulocytes and macrophages. Scand J Immunol 1976; suppl 5:9-16
[16] Baldwin GC, Gasson JC, Quan SG, et al. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor enhances neutrophil function in acquired immune deficiency syndrome patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988; 85:2763-66
[17] Baldwin GC, Chung GY, Kaslander C, et al. Colony-stimulating factor enhancement of myeloid effector cell cytotoxicity towards neuroectodermal tumour cells. Br J Haematol 1993; 83:545-53
[18] Root RK, Cohen MS. The microbicidal mechanisms of human neutrophils and eosinophils. Rev Infect Dis 1981; 3:565-98
[19] Baldwin GC, Fuller ND, Roberts RL, et al. Granulocyte- and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factors enhance neutrophil cytotoxicity toward HIV-infected cells. Blood 1989; 74:1673-77
[20] Foltin RW, Fischman MW. Smoked and intravenous cocaine in humans: acute tolerance, cardiovascular and subjective effects. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1991; 257:247-61
[21] O'Donnell AK, Mappin G, Sebo TJ, et al. Interstitial pneumonitis associated with crack' cocaine abuse. Chest 1991; 100:1155-57
[22] Hoffman CK, Goodman PC. Pulmonary edema in cocaine smokers. Radiology 1989; 172:463-65
[23] Kissner DG. Lawrence WD, Selis JE, et al. Crack lung: pulmonary disease caused by cocaine abuse. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987; 136:1250-52
[24] Cucco RA. Yoo OH, Cregler L, et al. Nonfatal pulmonary edema after "Freebase" cocaine smoking. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987; 136:179-81
[25] Forrester JM, Steele AW, Waldron JA, et al. Crack lung: an acute pulmonary syndrome with a spectrum of clinical and histopathologic findings. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990; 142: 462-67
[26] Groeneveld ABJ, Raijmakers PGHM, Hack CE, et al. Interleukin 8-related neutrophil elastase and the severity of the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Cytokine 1995; 7:746-52
[27] Tate RM, Repine JE. Neutrophils and the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis 1983; 128:552-59
[28] Chollet-Martin S, Montravers P, Gibert C, et al. High levels of interleukin-8 in the blood and alveolar spaces of patients with pneumonia and adult respiratory distress syndrome. Infect Immun 1993; 61:4553-59
[29] Donnelly TJ, Meade P, Jagels M, et al. Cytokine complement, and endotoxin profiles associated with the development of the adult respiratory distress syndrome after severe injury. Crit Care Med 1994; 22:768-76
[30] Donnelly SC, Strieter RM, Kunkel SL, et al. Interleukin-8 and development of adult respiratory distress syndrome in at-risk patient groups. Lancet 1993; 341:643-47
[31] Car BD, Meloni F, Luisetti M, et al. Elevated IL-8 and MCP-1 in the bronchoalveolar ravage fluid of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and pulmonary sarcoidosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994; 149:655-59
[32] Lynch JP, Standiford TJ, Rolfe MW, et al. Neutrophilic alveolitis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: the role of interleukin-8. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992; 145:1433-39
[33] Baars JW, Wolbink GJ, Hart MH, et al. The release of interleukin-8 during intravenous bolus treatment with interleukin-2. Ann Oncol 1994; 5:929-34
(*) From the Divisions of Hematology-Oncology and Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles.
Supported by NIH/NIDA grants DA08254 and NS33432 (Dr. Baldwin).
Manuscript received July 11, 1996; revision accepted October 2.
Reprint requests: Dr Baldwin, Division of Hematology-Oncology, 11-.934 Factor, Department of Medicine, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1678
COPYRIGHT 1997 American College of Chest Physicians
COPYRIGHT 2004 Gale Group