Study objective: To measure the in vivo rate of alveolar epithelial fluid clearance of the human lung in patients with pulmonary alveolar phospholipoproteinosis (PAP).
Design: Prospective clinical study.
Setting: The medical-surgical ICUs of a university teaching hospital.
Patients: Four patients with idiopathic PAP requiring therapeutic lung lavage.
Interventions: Large-volume lung lavage with isotonic saline solution using fiberoptic bronchoscopy followed by serial sampling of alveolar fluid using a wedged bronchial catheter.
Measurements and results: The rate of alveolar epithelial fluid clearance was calculated by measuring the concentration of protein in sequential samples. Alveolar epithelial fluid clearance over the first hour after lung lavage was 53 [+ or -] 14% (mean [+ or -] SD). Sequential samples in two patients indicated a sustained high rate of clearance over several hours. Plasma and alveolar fluid epinephrine levels were in the normal range in two patients.
Conclusions and significance: Alveolar fluid clearance is rapid after lung lavage in patients with PAP and appears to be driven by catecholamine-independent mechanisms. The rapid rate of alveolar epithelial fluid transport explains why patients with PAP tolerate large-volume lung lavage. (CHEST 2001; 120:271-274)
Key words: alveolar epithelial fluid transport; lung lavage; pulmonary alveolar phospholipoproteinosis; pulmonary edema
Abbreviations: AFC = alveolar fluid clearance; PAP = pulmonary alveolar phospholipoproteinosis
Large-volume lung lavage is well established as the method of choice when it is necessary to remove the phospholipoproteins that accumulate in the alveoli of patients with pulmonary alveolar phospholipoproteinosis (PAP) and that are responsible for the functional and gas-exchange abnormalities observed in this disorder.[1,2] The procedure is well tolerated by most patients despite concerns regarding the effect of a large-volume isotonic saline solution lavage on the lung. The short-term feasibility and success of the procedure seems to depend on the capacity of the lung to rapidly remove the residual alveolar fluid that remains in the lung after lavage. However, the rate and mechanism for removal of residual alveolar fluid after lung lavage in PAP has not been investigated.
Experimental studies of normal lung and acute lung injury have established that the normally tight alveolar epithelial barrier removes excess alveolar fluid primarily by active sodium transport.[3-10] Water crosses the alveolar barrier to maintain iso-osmolar conditions, probably in part by transmembrane water channels or aquaporins in the alveolar epithelium.[9,11-13] Deletion of these water channels in transgenic mouse models indicated that maximal rates of alveolar fluid clearance (AFC) do not depend on their presence.[14] Basal AFC has been measured in several animal species, and ranges from 3 to 20%/h.[3-5,8,14-17] The only estimate of the ability of the human alveolar barrier to remove alveolar fluid in the absence of preexistent pulmonary edema comes from ex vivo studies of human lung and has been reported to be relatively slow: basal rate of 3%/h; [Beta]-agonist stimulated rate of 7%/h.[18]
The primary objective of this study was to measure the in vivo rate of alveolar epithelial fluid clearance of the human lung in patients with PAP. To accomplish this objective, we prospectively analyzed serial alveolar fluid samples from patients with PAP after large-volume therapeutic lung lavage.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patient Selection
From 1990 to 1999, four patients with idiopathic PAP were prospectively identified by one of the investigators as requiring therapeutic lung lavage. One of these patients required two separate therapeutic lung lavages during this time period. Patients were admitted to the adult ICUs at Moffitt-Long Hospital, University of California, San Francisco. The patients were interviewed and their charts were reviewed to determine the cause of their PAP as well as any other lung disorders. The University of California, San Francisco Committee on Human Research approved this study.
Therapeutic Lung Lavage
Patients were sedated with IV narcotics and sedatives. A critical-care specialist performed oral endotracheal intubation using direct laryngoscopy. Mechanical ventilation was delivered using a volume ventilator with positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cm [H.sub.2]O, fraction of inspired oxygen of 1.0, and a tidal volume of 9 to 11 mL/kg of measured body weight. A fiberoptic bronchoscope inserted through the endotracheal tube was used to carry out sequential segmental lung lavage. The procedure was performed in one lung or the equivalent of one lung (ie, bilateral upper or lower lobes of lungs) depending on the distribution and severity of alveolar involvement as evidenced on a preprocedure chest CT scan. In each lung segment lavaged, serial 50-mL aliquots of isotonic saline solution warmed to 37.0 [degrees] C were instilled and aspirated through the bronchoscope. The procedure was continued as tolerated by the patient or until the lavage fluid cleared (range of lavage aliquots per lung segment, 7 to 10; total instilled volume for an entire procedure: average, 2.8 L; range, 1.7 to 4.2 L). An average of 1.1 L (range, 0.64 to 1.9 L) of saline solution remained in the lung after the procedure. Patients remained intubated for an average of 16 h (range, 1 to 27 h) after the procedure.
Collection of Clinical Samples
Alveolar fluid samples were obtained using a sterile 14-gauge suction catheter that was inserted through the endotracheal tube and wedged into the distal airways as previously described and validated.[3,19-21] Samples were collected immediately after the termination of lung lavage and then hourly until each patient was extubated. After collection, samples were centrifuged at 3,000g, and the total protein concentrations in the supernatants were measured by the biuret method.[19,21] Matched plasma samples were also collected. Epinephrine levels in plasma and alveolar liquid fluid were measured using standard methods in two patients.[22]
Calculation of AFC
AFC was estimated by comparing the final and initial alveolar liquid fluid protein concentrations using the following equation: AFC = 100 x [1 - (initial protein concentration/final protein concentration)].[9]
RESULTS
Four patients (three men, one woman; age range, 22 to 35 years) with idiopathic PAP were studied. The AFC rate over the first hour was 53 [+ or -] 14% (mean [+ or -] SD), as measured in four patients (Fig 1). Also, AFC was measured in the same patient after two separate lavage procedures. The AFC rates in the first hour in each of two separate lavage procedures were 53% and 69% in this patient (Fig 1, patient 4).
[GRAPH OMITTED]
Serial AFC rates (percentage per hour) after the first hour were measured in two patients. Patient 1 had serial values over the first 5 h of 62%, 50%, 47%, 58%, and 52%. Patient 2 had serial values over the first 3 h of 32%, 23%, and 29%. Thus, clearance was rapid, sustained, and similar in these patients.
Plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine levels obtained after the lavage were in the normal range ([is less than] 300 to 400 pg/mL)[23] in two patients: patient 2 (1-h values: epinephrine, 92 pg/mL; norepinephrine, 271 pg/mL) and patient 3 (30-min values: epinephrine, 173 pg/mL; norepinephrine, 329 pg/mL).
DISCUSSION
There was a rapid rate of clearance of fluid from the alveolar spaces after large volume isotonic saline solution lavage in patients with PAP. These results probably explain why patients with PAP tolerate large-volume therapeutic lung lavage. The rapid clearance rate is remarkable in view of previous measurements of AFC in the human lung. In the ex vivo human lung, basal AFC was only 3%/h and increased to 7%/h after stimulation with a [Beta]-adrenergic agonist.[18] In patients in the resolution phase of hydrostatic pulmonary edema, maximal alveolar fluid clearance was 25 [+ or -] 15%/h.[21] In patients with acute lung injury, the mean AFC has been reported to be 18 [+ or -] 15%/h.[19] In addition, AFC rates in patients with reperfusion lung injury after lung transplantation range from [is less than] 1%/h over a 24-h period to 32%/h over a 2-h period.[24] Experimental studies in several species show intermediate and fast rates of AFC under basal and stimulated conditions. The most rapid stimulated clearance rates, for example, have been measured in rats (40 to 50%/h)[25,26] and mice (30 to 50%/h).[14]
The measurement of the capacity of the alveolar epithelial barrier to remove excess fluid from the distal airspaces of the lung is based on measuring the concentration of protein in alveolar fluid in sequential samples using a wedged 14-gauge suction catheter. Several studies[3,8] indicate that this method is accurate. In one experimental study in dogs, alveolar micropuncture samples were compared to simultaneously obtained fluid from the distal airspaces of the lung with a wedged catheter; the data demonstrated an excellent correlation between the albumin concentration in the alveolar micropuncture samples and in the fluid obtained from the wedged catheter.[4]
This study confirms and extends the work of Alberti et al,[27] who reported changes in the composition of BAL fluid collected from patients with idiopathic alveolar proteinosis after therapeutic lung lavage. Alberti et al[27] reported an abrupt increase in the BAL fluid protein concentration within the first hour after BAL with 100 mL of saline solution, followed by a plateau over the next few hours. However, the rate of AFC was not determined in that study.
In spite of the intra-alveolar pathologic changes in PAP, this study demonstrates that the alveolar epithelium is functionally intact in patients with PAP. In fact, the actual high rates of AFC indicate that vectorial salt and water transport from the distal airspaces is not impaired in PAP.
While the catecholamine data were limited to two patients in this study, the very fast rates in vivo of human AFC in this study do not appear to be driven by catecholamine-dependent mechanisms. All patients were anesthetized for the lavage procedure with both narcotics and sedatives, thus reducing the likelihood of elevated endogenous catecholamines. This is an important issue because animal models of acute lung injury because of septic shock and hypovolemic shock indicate that increases in endogenous epinephrine levels can increase the rate of alveolar epithelial sodium transport and net alveolar liquid clearance.[22,28] Several catecholamine-independent mechanisms have been associated with an increase in alveolar epithelial sodium transport and net AFC: transforming growth factor-[Alpha],[29] epidermal growth factor,[30] prolonged exposure to hyperoxic gas,[7,31,32] and alveolar epithelial type II cell hyperplasia.[26] Interestingly, mild hyperplasia of type II pneumocytes has been observed in the lungs of PAP patients.[33,34] It is possible, of course, that there is some unknown mechanism uniquely associated with PAP that upregulates AFC.
In summary, alveolar epithelial fluid clearance is rapid (53 [+ or -] 14%/h) after lung lavage in patients with PAP and appears to be driven by catecholamine-independent mechanisms. The rapid rate of alveolar epithelial fluid transport explains why patients with PAP tolerate large-volume BAL. Also, the study provides the first data demonstrating a rapid rate of AFC from the in vivo human lung in the absence of preexistent pulmonary edema.
REFERENCES
[1] Goldstein LS, Kavuru MS, Curtis-McCarthy P, et al. Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis: clinical features and outcomes. Chest 1998; 114:1357-1362
[2] Shah PL, Hansell D, Lawson PR, et al. Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis: clinical aspects and current concepts on pathogenesis. Thorax 2000; 55:67-77
[3] Berthiaume Y, Staub NC, Matthay MA. [Beta]-Adrenergic agonists increase lung liquid clearance in anesthetized sheep. J Clin Invest 1987; 79:335-343
[4] Berthiaume Y, Broaddus VC, Gropper MA, et al. Alveolar liquid and protein clearance from normal dog lungs. J Appl Physiol 1988; 65:585-593
[5] Crandall ED, Heming TH, Palombo RL, et al. Effect of terbutaline on sodium transport in isolated perfused rat lung. J Appl Physiol 1986; 60:289-294
[6] Matthay MA, Landolt CC, Staub NC. Differential liquid and protein clearance from the alveoli of anesthetized sheep. J Appl Physiol 1982; 53:96-104
[7] Nici L, Dowin R, Gilmore-Herert M, et al. Upregulation of rat lung Na-K-ATPase during hyperoxic lung injury. Am J Physiol 1991; 261:L307-L314
[8] Smedira N, Gates L, Hastings R, et al. Alveolar and lung liquid clearance in anesthetized rabbits. J Appl Physiol 1991; 70:1827-1835
[9] Matthay MA, Folkesson HG, Verkman AS. Salt and water transport across alveolar and distal airway epithelia in the lung. Am J Physiol 1996; 270(4 Pt 1):L487-L503
[10] Matalon S, Benos DJ, Jackson RM. Biophysical and molecular properties of amiloride-inhibitable sodium channels in alveolar epithelial cells. Am J Physiol 1996; 15:L1-L22
[11] Hasegawa H, Ma T, Skach W, et al. Molecular cloning of a mercurial-insensitive water channel expressed in selected water-transporting tissues. J Biol Chem 1994; 269:5497-5500
[12] Folkesson HG, Matthay MA, Hasegawa H, et al. Transcellular water transport in lung alveolar epithelium through mercury-sensitive water channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91:4970-4974
[13] Matthay MA, Flori HR, Conner ER, et al. Alveolar epithelial fluid transport: basic mechanisms and clinical relevance. Proc Assoc Am Physicians 1998; 110:496-505
[14] Ma T, Fukuda N, Song Y, et al. Lung fluid transport in aquaporin-5 knockout mice. J Clin Invest 2000; 105:93-100
[15] Fukuda N, Folkesson HG, Matthay MA. Relationship of interstitial fluid volume to alveolar fluid clearance in mice: ventilated versus in situ studies. J Appl Physiol 2000; 89:672-679
[16] Dobbs LG, Gonzalez R, Matthay MA, et al. Highly water-permeable type I alveolar epithelial cells confer high water permeability between the airspace and vasculature in rat lung. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:2991-2996
[17] Norlin A, Finely N, Abedinpour P, et al. Alveolar liquid clearance in the anesthetized ventilated guinea pig. Am J Physiol 1998; 274(2 Pt 1):L235-L243
[18] Sakuma T, Okaniwa G, Nakada T, et al. Alveolar fluid clearance in the resected human lung. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994; 150:305-310
[19] Matthay MA, Wiener-Kronish JP. Intact epithelial barrier function is critical for the resolution of alveolar edema in humans. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990; 142:1250-1257
[20] Verghese GM, McCormick-Shannon K, Mason RJ, et al. Hepatocyte growth factor and keratinocyte growth factor in the pulmonary edema fluid of patients with acute lung injury: biologic and clinical significance. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 158:386-394
[21] Verghese GM, Ware LB, Matthay BA, et al. Alveolar epithelial fluid transport and the resolution of clinically severe hydrostatic pulmonary edema. J Appl Physiol 1999; 87:1301-1312
[22] Pittet JF, Wiener-Kronish JP, McElroy MC, et al. Stimulation of lung epithelial liquid clearance by endogenous release of catecholamines in septic shock in anesthetized rats. J Clin Invest 1994; 94:663-671
[23] Cryer PE. Physiology and pathophysiology of the human sympathoadrenal neuroendocrine system. N Engl J Med 1980; 303:436-444
[24] Ware LB, Golden JA, Finkbeiner WE, et al. Alveolar epithelial fluid transport capacity in reperfusion lung injury after lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159:980-988
[25] Jayr C, Garat C, Meignan M, et al. Alveolar liquid and protein clearance in anesthetized ventilated rats. J Appl Physiol 1994; 76:2636-2642
[26] Wang Y, Folkesson HG, Jayr C, et al. Alveolar epithelial fluid transport can be simultaneously upregulated by both KGF and [Beta]-agonist therapy. J Appl Physiol 1999; 87:1852-1860
[27] Alberti A, Luisetti M, Braschi A, et al. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid composition in alveolar proteinosis: early changes after therapeutic lavage. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 154: 817-820
[28] Pittet JF, Brenner TJ, Modelska K, et al. Alveolar liquid clearance is increased by endogenous catecholamines in hemorrhagic shock in rats. J Appl Physiol 1996; 81:830-837
[29] Folkesson HG, Pittet JF, Nitenberg G, et al. Transforming growth factor increases alveolar liquid clearance in anesthetized ventilated rats. Am J Physiol 1996; 271:L236-L244
[30] Borok Z, Hami A, Danto SI, et al. Effects of EGF on alveolar epithelial junctional permeability and active sodium transport. Am J Physiol 1996; 270:L559-L565
[31] Haskell JF, Yue G, Benos DJ, et al. Upregulation of sodium conductive pathways in alveolar type II cells in sublethal hyperoxia. Am J Physiol 1994; 266(1 Pt 1):L30-L37
[32] Sznajder JI, Olivera WG, Ridge KM, et al. Mechanisms of lung liquid clearance during hyperoxia in isolated rat lungs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 151:1519-1525
[33] Wang BM, Stern EJ, Schmidt RA, et al. Diagnosing pulmonary alveolar proteinosis: a review and an update. Chest 1997; 111:460-466
[34] Fraser RS, Muller NL, Colman N, et al. Metabolic pulmonary disease. In: Fraser RS, Muller NL, Colman N, et al, eds. Diagnosis of diseases of the chest. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders, 1999; 2699-2735
(*) From the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (Dr. Chesnutt), Department of Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR; the Department of Physiology (Dr. Folkesson), Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, Rootstown, OH; and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (Drs. Nuckton, Golden, and Matthay), Departments of Medicine and Anesthesia, and Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA. Supported in part by National Institutes of Health grants HL51854 and HL51856, and American Lung Association of California research program grants for Drs. Chesnutt and Folkesson.
Manuscript received April 20, 2000; revision accepted November 28, 2000.
Correspondence to: Mark S. Chesnutt, MD, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, UHN-67, Oregon Health Sciences University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, Oregon 97201-3098; e-mail: chesnutm@ohsu.edu
COPYRIGHT 2001 American College of Chest Physicians
COPYRIGHT 2001 Gale Group