Find information on thousands of medical conditions and prescription drugs.

Loracarbef

Loracarbef is a second-generation cephalosporin antibiotic, also called Lorabid. Its chemical name is (6R,7S)-7--3-chloro-8-oxo-1-azabicyclooct-2-ene-2-carboxylic acid monohydrate. Its empirical formula is C16H16ClN3O4•H2O, and its molecular mass is 367.8.

Home
Diseases
Medicines
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
Labetalol
Lacrisert
Lactitol
Lactuca virosa
Lactulose
Lamictal
Lamisil
Lamivudine
Lamotrigine
Lanophyllin
Lansoprazole
Lantus
Lariam
Larotid
Lasix
Latanoprost
Lescol
Letrozole
Leucine
Leucovorin
Leukeran
Levaquin
Levetiracetam
Levitra
Levocabastine
Levocetirizine
Levodopa
Levofloxacin
Levomenol
Levomepromazine
Levonorgestrel
Levonorgestrel
Levophed
Levora
Levothyroxine sodium
Levoxyl
Levulan
Lexapro
Lexiva
Librium
Lidocaine
Lidopen
Linezolid
Liothyronine
Liothyronine Sodium
Lipidil
Lipitor
Lisinopril
Lithane
Lithobid
Lithonate
Lithostat
Lithotabs
Livostin
Lodine
Loestrin
Lomotil
Loperamide
Lopressor
Loracarbef
Loratadine
Loratadine
Lorazepam
Lortab
Losartan
Lotensin
Lotrel
Lotronex
Lotusate
Lovastatin
Lovenox
Loxapine
LSD
Ludiomil
Lufenuron
Lupron
Lutropin alfa
Luvox
Luxiq
Theophylline
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z

Read more at Wikipedia.org


[List your site here Free!]


Is a 5-day course of antibiotics as effective as a 10-day course for the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis and the prevention of poststreptococcal
From Journal of Family Practice, 12/1/00 by Richard W. Jr. Lord

Dieter A, Horst S, Helmerking M. Short-course antibiotic treatment of 4782 culture-proven cases of Group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis and incidence of poststreptococcal sequelae. J Infect Dis 2000; 182:509-16.

* BACKGROUND Recent studies have shown that a short course of a macrolide or cephalosporin is just as effective as 10 days of penicillin. However, there has been concern that a shorter course of antibiotics would lead to an increase in poststreptococcal sequelae. This study was undertaken to determine if a shorter course of antibiotics would lead to an increased risk of acute rheumatic fever and glomerulonephritis.

* POPULATION STUDIED This study included a total of 5318 children aged 1 to 18 years from 137 pediatric practices in Germany. Inclusion criteria included temperature of at least 38 [degrees] C and 1 or more of the following: exudate of the pharynx or tonsils, erythema of the pharynx or tonsils, and cervical adenopathy. They also had to have a positive rapid antigen test for Group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus (GABHS). Exclusion criteria included a negative culture for GABHS, recent antibiotic use, and a history of rheumatic fever or glomerulonephritis in the patient or a person in the same household. The racial make-up of the patients is not given, and this may limit the generalizability of this study to family physician practices in the United States.

* STUDY DESIGN AND VALIDITY This was a randomized open-label design in which patients were randomized to either 10 days of penicillin V (50,000 IU/kg/day with a maximum of 2,250,000 IU/day) or 5 days of one of the following: amoxicillin clavulanate, ceftibuten, cefuroxime axetil, loracarbef, clarithromycin, or erythromycin estolate. The patients were evaluated 2 to 4 days after the end of treatment, 7 to 9 days after the end of treatment, at 7 to 8 weeks, and at 6 and 12 months. Rheumatic fever was diagnosed on the basis of the updated Jones criteria and glomerulonephritis based on the pediatrician's assessment. The number of patients followed up for 12 months (n=4077) was a little short of the sample size required (n=4710) to detect a difference of 3 per 1000 versus 9 per 1000 in the incidence of rheumatic fever or glomerulonephritis. Other limitations of the study include the open-label design and the failure to describe the method of allocation in more detail. Since the patients and physicians knew the group assignment, there may have been an expectation that those receiving the newer, "better" drugs would do better clinically. The study was supported by the companies making these newer drugs.

* OUTCOMES MEASURED The primary outcome was the probability of rheumatic fever or glomerulonephritis in the study groups. Secondary outcomes included clinical response as judged by the investigators, resolution of symptoms, microbiologic cure, and safety.

* RESULTS Three patients developed rheumatic fever, and 2 had glomerulonephritis during the study period (4 in the larger 5-day group). Analysis of the individual cases led the authors to conclude that none of the sequelae were related to the case of streptococcal pharyngitis treated in the study. The clinical response rates were similar at the first follow-up visit (94.5% vs 93.4%). At the 7- to 9-day visit 39.7% of the 5-day patients and 45.6% of the 10-day patients still had symptoms (P [is less than] .001). The recurrence rates between the 2 groups were 24.4% in the 10-day group and 21.9% in the 5-day group (P [is less than] .03). They also found a 6% resistance rate and 6.8% intermediate resistance rate to macrolides among the isolates in their study.

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

Although somewhat underpowered, this study supports the hypothesis that a 5-day course of one of the study antibiotics in children is as effective as a 10-day course of penicillin V in the treatment of GABHS pharyngitis. However, the widespread use of broad-spectrum agents for a common infection is a significant concern in an age of increasing bacterial antibiotic resistance. For patients who have documented streptococcal pharyngitis and are allergic to penicillin, the use of a 5-day course of one of the study antibiotics is reasonable.

COPYRIGHT 2000 Appleton & Lange
COPYRIGHT 2001 Gale Group

Return to Loracarbef
Home Contact Resources Exchange Links ebay