Norplant has gotten a reprieve--and an execution.
In a recent letter to health care professionals, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals announced that women using Norplant from batches distributed on or after October 20, 1999, can discontinue their backup methods of contraception, thanks to evidence indicating no loss of contraceptive effectiveness in those lots.
Wyeth suspended shipment of Norplant kits in August of 2000, when questions about their efficacy were first raised. But despite the findings that efficacy was unimpaired, the company also said that it will not reintroduce the Norplant system, which contains six implantable capsules, because of "limitations in product component supplies." Repeated calls to Wyeth seeking comment on the action were not returned by press time.
The latest Norplant kits still in use were made in 1999. Since they expire within 5 years, users will have to consider other methods of contraception by 2004. Wyeth will continue to pay for implant removal or for backup, barrier, or other nonhormonal methods of contraception until December 31, 2002.
Wyeth had sent letters to doctors in August and September 2000, warning that the batches had atypically low levels of levonorgestrel release on routine shelf-life stability tests. The letters advised doctors to stop inserting new implants and to have current Norplant users employ backup contraception. An investigation has revealed that those implants are as effective as the ones distributed earlier.
Clinicians were disappointed to hear that Norplant will not be reintroduced.
"I think it would be worthwhile to have an implantable product," said Dr. David F. Archer, director of the contraceptive research and development program at Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk.
He suggested that Wyeth may have chosen to discontinue Norplant to make way for its two-capsule implant product called Jadelle or Norplant II. The product was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1996. Originally, the FDA stated that the implants were approved for 3 years of use, but the agency extended that period to 5 years in 2001. The product has yet to be marketed in the United States.
The departure of Norplant is "a real loss for American women," said Dr. David Grimes, vice president of biomedical affairs at Family Health International. "At present, there is no other subdermal [form of contraception] in the United States. Norplant was safe, effective, and worked extremely well."
Dr. Grimes, also of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, estimated that at least one patient per week requests the implants, only to be told they are no longer available.
Norplant was "welcomed by women who didn't do well with other methods of birth control," added Dr. Felicia Stewart, codirector of the Center for Reproductive Health Research and Policy at the University of California, San Francisco. She suggested that Wyeth's decision may have reflected a perception of low demand.
According to the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, contraceptive implants were used by 0.9% of women aged 15-44 years, compared with birth control pills, which were used by 17.3% of women in that age range.
COPYRIGHT 2002 International Medical News Group
COPYRIGHT 2002 Gale Group