Barbital chemical structure
Find information on thousands of medical conditions and prescription drugs.

Barbital

Barbital (marketed under the brand name Veronal), also called barbitone, was the first commercially marketed barbiturate. It was used as a sleeping aid (hypnotic) from 1903 until the mid-1930s. The chemical names for barbital are diethylmalonyl urea or diethylbarbituric acid. Its chemical formula is (C2H5)2C~CO NH]ICO (sodium 5,5-diethyl barbiturate). Veronal was prepared by condensing diethylmalonic ester with urea in the presence of sodium ethylate, or by adding ethyl iodide to the silver salt of malonylurea. more...

Home
Diseases
Medicines
A
B
Baciim
Bacitracin
Baclofen
Bactrim
Bactroban
Barbexaclone
Barbital
Baros
Basiliximab
Baycol
Beclamide
Beclometasone
Beclovent
Beconase
Beldin
Benadryl
Benazepril
Bendroflumethiazide
Benserazide
Bentiromide
Benylin
Benzaclin
Benzalkonium chloride
Benzocaine
Benzonatate
Betacarotene
Betadine
Betahistine
Betamethasone
Betaxolol
Bextra
Biaxin
Bibrocathol
Bicalutamide
Bicillin
Biclotymol
Biotin
Bisoprolol
Bleomycin
Blocadren
Boldenone
Boniva
Bontril
Bosentan
Bravelle
Brethaire
Brevibloc
Brevicon
Bricanyl
Bromazepam
Bromelain
Bromhexine
Bromocriptine
Brompheniramine
Bronkodyl
Bronopol
BSS
Bucet
Budesonide
Bumetanide
Bupivacaine
Buprenex
Buprenorphine
Buserelin
Buspar
Buspirone
Busulfan
Butalbital
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z

The result was an odorless, slightly bitter, white crystalline powder.

Barbital was first synthesized in 1902 by German chemists Emil Fischer and Joseph von Mering. They published their discovery in 1903 and it was marketed in 1904 by the Bayer company as “Veronal”. A soluble salt of barbital was marketed by the Schering company as “Medinal.” It was dispensed for “insomnia induced by nervous excitability”. It was provided in either capsules or cachets. The therapeutic dose was ten to fifteen grains.

Veronal was considered to be a great improvement over the existing hypnotics. Its taste was slightly bitter, but an improvement over the strong, unpleasant taste of the commonly used bromides. It had few side effects. Its therapeutic dose was far below the toxic dose. However, prolonged usage resulted in tolerance to the drug, requiring higher doses to reach the desired effect. Fatal overdoses of this slow acting hypnotic were not uncommon.

Read more at Wikipedia.org


[List your site here Free!]


Antibody classes & subclasses induced by mucosal immunization of mice with Streptococcus pyogenes M6 protein & oligodeoxynucleotides containing
From Indian Journal of Medical Research, 5/1/04 by Teloni, R

Background & objectives: Type-specific antibodies against M protein are critical for human protection as they enhance phagocytosis and are protective. An ideal vaccine for the protection against Streptococcus pyogenes would warrant mucosal immunity, but mucosally administered M-protein has been shown to be poorly immunogenic in animals. We used a recombinant M type 6 protein to immunize mice in the presence of synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides containing CpG motifs (immunostimulatory sequences: ISS) or cholera toxin (CT) to explore its possible usage in a mucosal vaccine.

Methods: Mice were immunized by intranasal (in) or intradermal (id) administration with four doses at weekly intervals of M6-protein (10 µg/mouse) with or without adjuvant (ISS, 10 µg/mouse or CT, 0,5 µg/mouse). M6 specific antibodies were measured by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay using class and subclass specific monoclonal antibodies.

Results: The use of ISS induced an impressive anti M-protein serum IgG response but when id administered was not detectable in the absence of adjuvant. When used in, M-protein in the presence of both ISS and CT induced anti M-protein IgA in the bronchoalveolar lavage, as well as specific IgG in the serum. IgG were able to react with serotype M6 strains of S. pyogenes. The level of antibodies obtained by immunizing mice in with M-protein and CT was higher in comparison to M-protein and ISS. The analysis of anti-M protein specific IgG subclasses showed high levels of IgG1, IgG2a and IgG2b, and low levels of IgG3 when ISS were used as adjuvant. Thus, in the presence of ISS, the ratio IgG2a/IgG1 and (IgG2a+IgG3)/IgGl >1 indicated a type 1-like response obtained both in mucosally or systemically vaccinated mice.

Interpretation & conclusion: Our study offers a reproducible model of anti-M protein vaccination that could be applied to test new antigenic formulations to induce an anti-group A Streptococcus (GAS) vaccination suitable for protection against the different diseases caused by this bacterium.

Key words Anti GAS vaccination - M6 protein - mucosal immunity - Streptococcus pyogenes

M protein is considered the main determinant factor present on the surface of group A Streptococcus (GAS)'. In humans and animals only M protein typespecific antibodies have the capacity to opsonize streptococci and to override the anti-phagocytic property of M protein. The development of an efficacious and safe vaccine against GAS infections was prevented by two main factors: the high number of different, non crossreactive serotypes and the fact that some portions of the protein (B repetitive domain) contain autoantibodiesinducing epitopes against cardiac and skeletal tissues2. An ideal vaccine for the protection against GAS would warrant muscosal immunity, but mucosally administered M-protein has been shown to be poorly immunogenic in animals3,4. Several adjuvants or carrier proteins such as Freund adjuvant (Fa), cholera toxin (CT), diphteriatoxoid (Dt) have been used earlier to increase the antigenicity of GAS surface antigens. Because of the relative toxicity of Fa and CT, only Dt could be used in humans. It has been shown that synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides (ODN) containing unmethylated CpG dinucleotides in particular base contexts (immuno-stimulating sequences, ISS) cause activation of B and NK cells as well as antigen presenting cells. When co-administered to experimental animals with proteins or peptides, ISS act as potent adjuvants for a type-1 immune response. A particular advantage of ISS as adjuvants is their activity both in parenteral (intramuscular, subcutaneous, sc and intradermal, id)5 and mucosal (intranasal, in, oral and intrarectal) administration6. The aim of the present study was to define the possible use of an adjuvant that could be used without conjugation, both by parenteral and mucosal immunization, to increase the immunogenicity of M protein. We explored the potential of ISS to induce antiMo antibody response when used as a systemic and mucosal adjuvant7,8. The local and systemic immune response was studied to compare the activity of ISS to that of cholera toxin, a widely used adjuvant in experimental mucosal vaccination that induces a Th-2 type of immune response.

Material & Methods

Reagent and antigens: Single-stranded, phosphorothioated CpG motif containing ODN and control ODN (M-ODN) were synthesized (M-Medica Firenze, Italy) according to published sequences9 (5'TGACTGTGAACGTTCGAGATGA-3' and 5TGACTGTGAAGCATCGAGATGA-3 ' respectively). The cholera toxin (CT) purified from Vibrio cholerae was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). The recombinant M6 protein was kindly provided by V. Fischetti4.

Immunization protocols: Groups (n=6) of female BALB/c mice (6-8 wk old; Charles River, Calco, Lecco, Italy) were immunized by intradermal (id) injection of M6 protein alone (10 µg/mouse) or in combination with ISS or M-ODN at 50 ?g in a total volume of 50 or 100 µl. ISS were administered in the first inoculum only. Groups (n=6) of the same animals were immunized by intranasal (in) inhalation of 10 µg/mouse of M6 protein alone or in combination with 0.5 ?g/mouse of CT, 10-20 µg,mouse of ISS or M-ODN in a total volume of 66 µl (33 µ/naris). Drops of vaccine were applied to external nares of mice after a light anaesthesia with 10 µ/g intraperitoneal (ip) administration of a solution containing 5 mg/ml ketamin (Ketavet; Farmaceutici Gellini S.p.?., Latina, Italy) and 0.3 mg/ml xilazin (Rompun; Bayer S.p.A., Leverkusen, Germany).

Collection of samples'. From mice immunized three times on days O, 10 and 20; sera and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were collected on day 30. Plasma was collected after a light anaesthesia by retroorbital puncture 30 days after the first inoculum. Samples were immediately frozen at -35°C until use.

BAL fluids were obtained through the insertion of a cannula into the trachea after cervical dislocation. Lungs were then flushed with 0.6 ml of saline. The return was spun to remove cellular debris and immediately frozen at -35°C until IgA assay.

Evaluation of the immune response: The antibody response to M6 protein in sera was determined by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as previously described10. Briefly, M6 protein was used at 1 µg/ml in PBS (100 µl/well) to coat flat-bottomed 96well plates (Dynatech, Chantilly, VA) overnight at +4° C. After a postcoat of l h at +40C with PBS containing 2 percent bovine serum albumin (BSA), sera (non-immune control and test sera) were added to appropriate wells at different dilutions in PBS with 0.5 per cent BSA containing 0.05 per cent Tween 20 (PBS-T). After overnight incubation at +4°C and washing, plates were incubated with anti-IgG ([gamma] chain specific) goat anti-mouse antibodies conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Birmingham, AL). After 1h incubation and washings, p-nitrophenylphosphate (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added as a substrate. The reaction was blocked with 3 M NaOH and the absorbance evaluated at 405 nm using the Microtitre reader Victor-1420 multilabel counter (EG & G/Wallac, Turku, Finland). All tests were designed to compare in the same ELISA plate sera from mice belonging to different experimental groups.

Subclasses of M6 protein IgG positive sera were determined using rat anti-mouse IgG subclass biotinilated monoclonal antibodies (PharMingen, San Diego, CA, USA) and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin (PharMingen). After the addition of o-phenylenediamine (Sigma fast; Sigma, USA) the reaction was stopped with 2N H2S04 and the absorbance (ABS) was evaluated with the plate reader at 490 nm.

The anti-M6 protein IgA production in sera and BAL was evaluated using a rat anti-mouse IgA biotinilated monoclonal antibody (PharMingen, San Diego, CA) and incubated for l h at+37^sup 0^C. After washings, horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin was added and the reaction was evaluated as subclass IgG assay. Endpoint titres were expressed as the reciprocal Iog2 of the last serum or BAL dilution, which gave an optical density (OD), at 405 or 490 nm higher than the cut-off. The ABS cut-off value was determined as the double of the background and it was always higher than the mean ABS value of sera from untreated mice at the lowest dilution.

Reactivity of anti-Mprotein serum: The reactivity of the anti-M protein serum was tested by the Ouchterlony double diffusion test performed with 1 per cent agarose gel with sodium barbital buffer, pH 7.4, using the hot acidic M protein extract (according to the M serotyping procedure of Lancefield)" prepared from the strains belonging to the Istituto Superiore di Sanita (ISS) collection which included Group A streptococcus Ml: ISS-650, Group A streptococcus M3: ISS-651, Group A streptococcus M6:-ISS-654, Group G streptococcus: ISS3833, Group B streptococcus serotype III: ISS-2601.

Statistical analysis: The data were expressed as arithmetic means of at least four independent experiments ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The data were analyzed for normal distribution and the statistical significance of the difference between groups was determined by the two-tailed unpaired Student's t-test using the Statview 4.1 program (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA, USA). Differences were considered significant with P

Results

Mice vaccinated id with recombinant M6 protein in the absence of adjuvant or in the presence of CT or MODN did not develop a specific IgG response (data not shown). One the other hand, when ISS were used, mice developed a detectable anti-M6 protein specific immune response. IgG titres were very high, when ISS were used as adjuvants for a systemic (id) vaccination (Fig. 1). However, in mice vaccinated id with ISS, M6 specific IgA were not detected in BAL. The specificity of the response was determined using both ELISA (Figs 1-4) and radial immunodiffusion methods (Table).

Mice vaccinated in with recombinant M6 protein in the absence of adjuvant did not develop a specific Ig response. Intranasal M-6 vaccination in the presence of ISS induced a good systemic 1gG response (Fig. 1) and mucosal 1gA response (Fig.2). When using ISS, however, mean titres of BAL anti-M-6 1gA were lower than those obtained immunizing mice in the presence of CT (Fig.2) using the same immunization protocol. The use of ISS induced a relative higher synthesis of anti-M6 IgG2b than IgG2a. This phenomenon, that is indicative of a Thl-like immune response, was observed when ISS were used as systemic adjuvants (Fig.3). When ISS were used as mucosal adjuvants, IgG2a had the same mean titre than IgG2b. However, the ratio IgG2a/IgGl (Fig.4) as well as the ratio (IgG2a+IgG3)/IgGl (data not shown) were >1 when ISS were used both as systemic and mucosal adjuvant, indicating that ISS induce a Th 1 -like immune response10. On the other hand, CT induced a relative higher synthesis of anti M-6 IgGl and IgG2athan IgG2b (Fig.3). This pattern of M6 specific IgG subclass and the ratio IgG2a/IgGl

Discussion

The wide range of streptococcal diseases, which include suppurative infections, toxin mediated diseases and non-suppurative sequelae makes it difficult to clearly define the relevance of the different role of specific immunity in protection or autoimmunity induction12-15.

The main GAS virulence factor, M protein, is known to have anti-opsonic activity and some portions of this protein (B repetitive domain) contains autoantibodies inducing-epitopes against cardiac and skeletal tissues. The design of a vaccine to prevent GAS mediated diseases should take into account all these problems and together with the research for suitable antigens, it should also consider the prevalent type of immune response (Th 1 or Th2) raised by the antigen-adjuvant combination used.

In the present study it was confirmed that CT is a strong mucosal adjuvant16 for GAS M protein. In addition, we demonstrated that ISS showed strong systemic and mucosal adjuvant activity when coadministered with M protein. Both adjuvants did not require conjugation with the protein to induce significant antibody responses. CT induced a Th2 response, as indirectly demonstrated by the prevalent production of IgG 1 over IgG2a specific anti-M protein IgG subclass. On the other hand, the IgG2a/IgGl ratio was clearly >1 in mice receiving ISS as adjuvants, thus indicating that ISS favor an anti-M protein ThI immune response?. In addition, ISS, but not CT, were shown to strongly induce anti-M protein specific IgG response irrespective of the systemic or mucosal route of vaccination. In conclusion, our study offers a reproducible model of anti-M protein vaccination that could be applied to test new antigenic formulations to induce an anti-GAS vaccination suitable for protection against the different diseases caused by this bacterium.

References

1. Saint S, Matthay MA. Risk reduction in the intensive care unit. Am J Med 1998; 105 : 515-23.

2. Dale JB. Group A streptococcal vaccines. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1999: 13 : 227-43.

3. Hayman WA, Brandt ER, Reif WA, Cooper J, Saul A, Good MF. Mapping the minimal murine T cell and B cell epitopes within a peptide vaccine candidate from the conserved region of the M protein of group A streptococcus, Int Immunol 1997; 9: 1723-33.

4. Bolken TC, Franke CA, Jones KF, Bell RH, Swanson RM, King DS, et al. Analysis of factors affecting surface expression and immunogenicity of recombinant proteins expressed by Gram-positive commensal vectors. Infect Immun 2002; 70 : 2487-91.

5. Kobayashi II, Horner AA, Takabayashi K, Nguyen MD, Huang E, Cinman N, et al. Immunostimulatory DNA pre-priming: a novel approach for prolonged Thl-biased immunity. Cell Immunol 1999; 198 : 69-75.

6. Horner AA, Raz E. Immunostimulatory sequence oligodeoxynucleotide: A novel mucosal adjuvant. Clin Immunol 2000; 95: S19-29.

7. von Hunolstein C, Mariotti S, Teloni R, Alfarone G, Romagnoli G, Orefici G, et al. The adjuvant effect of synthetic oligodeoxynucleotide containing CpG motif converts the antiHaemophilus influenzas type b glycoconjugates into efficient anti-polysaccharide and anti-carrier polyvalent vaccines. Vaccine 2001; 19:3058-66.

8. von Hunolstein C, Teloni R, Mariotti S, Recchia S, Orefici G, Nisini R. Synthetic oligodeoxynucleotide containing CpG motif induces an anti-polysaccharide type 1-like immune response after immunization of mice with Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine. Int Immunol 2000; 12: 295-303.

9. Roman M, Martin-Orozoo E, Goodman JS, Nguyen MD, Sato Y, Ronaghy A, et al. Immunostimulatory DNA sequences function as T helper-1-promoting adjuvants. Nat Med 1997; 3 : 849-54.

10. Mariotti S, Teloni R, von Hunolstein C, Romagnoli G, Orefici G, Nisini R. Immunogenicity of anti-Haemophilits influenzae type b CRM197 conjugate following mucosal vaccination with oligodeoxynucleotide containing immunostimulatory sequences as adjuvant. Vaccine 2002; 20 : 2229-39.

11. Cayeux P, Wahl R. New method of extraction and purification of the M protein of Streptococcus pyogenes of the a group applied to type 24. Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris) 1963; 105: 106370.

12. Weiss KA, Laverdiere M. Group A streptococcus invasive infections: a review. Can J Surg 1997; 40 : 18-25.

13. Norrby SR, Norrby-Teglund A. Infections due to group A streptococcus: new concepts and potential treatment strategies. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1997;26: 691-3.

14. Gonzalez MH. Necrotizing fasciitis and gangrene of the upper extremity. Hand Clin 1998; 14 : 635-45.

15. Bannan J, Visvanathan K, Zabriskie JB. Structure and function of streptococcal and staphylococcal superantigens in septic shock. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1999; 13 : 387-96.

16. Marinaro M, Staats HF, Hiroi T, Jackson RJ, Coste M, Boyaka PN, et al. Mucosal adjuvant effect of cholera toxin in mice results from induction of T helper 2 (Th2) cells and IL-4. J Immunol 1995; 155: 4621-9.

R. Teloni, C. von Hunolstein, S. Mariotti, S. Donati, G. Orefici & R. Nisini

Istituto Superiore di Sanita, Rome, Italy

Received August 7, 2003

Reprint requests: Dr Roberto Nisini, Lab Batteriologia e Micologia Medica, Istituto Superiore di Sanita, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 ,Rome, Italy

e-mail .

Copyright Indian Council of Medical Research May 2004
Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights Reserved

Return to Barbital
Home Contact Resources Exchange Links ebay