Dexamethasone chemical structure
Find information on thousands of medical conditions and prescription drugs.

Dexamethasone

Dexamethasone is a synthetic member of the glucocorticoid class of hormones. It acts as an anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressant. Its potency is about 40 times that of hydrocortisone. more...

Home
Diseases
Medicines
A
B
C
D
Dacarbazine
Dactinomycin
Dalmane
Danazol
Dantrolene
Dapoxetine
Dapsone
Daptomycin
Daraprim
Darvocet
Darvon
Daunorubicin
Daunorubicin
Daypro
DDAVP
Deca-Durabolin
Deferoxamine
Delsym
Demeclocycline
Demeclocycline
Demerol
Demulen
Denatonium
Depakene
Depakote
Depo-Provera
Desferal
Desflurane
Desipramine
Desmopressin
Desogen
Desogestrel
Desonide
Desoxyn
Desyrel
Detrol
Dexacort
Dexamethasone
Dexamfetamine
Dexedrine
Dexpanthenol
Dextran
Dextromethorphan
Dextromoramide
Dextropropoxyphene
Dextrorphan
Diabeta
Diacerein
Diacetolol
Dial
Diamox
Diazepam
Diazoxide
Dibenzepin
Diclofenac
Diclohexal
Didanosine
Dieldrin
Diethylcarbamazine
Diethylstilbestrol
Diethyltoluamide
Differin
Diflucan
Diflunisal
Digitoxin
Digoxin
Dihydrocodeine
Dihydroergotamine
Dihydrotachysterol
Dilantin
Dilaudid
Diltahexal
Diltiazem
Dimenhydrinate
Dimercaprol
Dimetapp
Dimethyl sulfoxide
Dimethyltryptamine
Dimetridazole
Diminazene
Diovan
Dioxybenzone
Diphenhydramine
Diphenoxylate
Dipipanone
Dipivefrine
Diprivan
Diprolene
Diproteverine
Dipyridamole
Disulfiram
Disulfiram
Dizocilpine
Dobutamine
Docetaxel
Docusate sodium
Dofetilide
Dolasetron
Dolobid
Dolophine
Domperidone
Donepezil
Dopamine
Dopram
Doral
Doramectin
Doriden
Dornase alfa
Doryx
Dostinex
Doxapram
Doxazosin
Doxepin
Doxil
Doxil
Doxorubicin
Doxy
Doxycycline
Doxyhexal
Doxylamine
Drisdol
Drixoral
Dronabinol
Droperidol
Drospirenone
Duloxetine
Durabolin
Duragesic
Duraphyl
Duraquin
Dutasteride
Dv
Dyclonine
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z

Therapeutic use

Dexamethasone is used to treat many inflammatory and autoimmune conditions, e.g., rheumatoid arthritis. It is also given to cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, to counteract certain side-effects of their antitumor treatment. Dexamethasone can augment the antiemetic effect of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists like ondansetron.

In brain tumours (primary or metastatic), dexamethasone is used to counteract the development of edema, which could eventually compress other brain structures. Dexamethasone is also given in cord compression where tumor is compressing the spinal cord.

Dexamethasone is also used in certain hematological malignancies, especially in the treatment of multiple myeloma, in which dexamethasone is given alone or together with thalidomide (thal-dex) or a combination of Adriamycin and vincristine (VAD).

It is useful to counteract allergic shock, if given in high doses. It is present in certain eye drops and as a nasal spray (Dexacort®).

Diagnostic use

Dexamethasone is also used in a diagnostic context, namely in its property to suppress the natural pituitary-adrenal axis. Patients presenting with clinical signs of glucocorticoid excess (Cushing's syndrome) are generally diagnosed by a 24-hour urine collection for cortisol or by a dexamethasone suppression test. During the latter, the response of the body to a high dose of glucocorticoids is monitored. Various forms are performed. In the most common form, a patient takes a nightime dose of either 1 or 4 mg of dexamethasone, and the serum cortisol levels are measured in the morning. If the levels are relatively high (over 5 μg/dl or 150 nmol/l), then the test is positive and the patient has an autonomous source of either cortisol or ACTH, indicating Cushing's syndrome. Longer versions rely on urine collections on oral dexamethasone over various days.

Contraindications

Some of these contraindications are relative:

  • Existing gastrointestinal ulceration
  • Cushing's syndrome
  • Severe forms of heart insufficiency
  • Severe hypertension
  • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
  • Systemic tuberculosis
  • Severe systemic viral, bacterial, and fungal infections
  • Preexisting wide angle glaucoma
  • Osteoporosis

Side effects

If dexamethasone is given orally or by injection (parenteral) over a period of more than a few days, side-effects common to systemic glucocorticoids may occur. These may include:

  • Stomach upset, increased sensitivity to stomach acid to the point of ulceration of esophagus, stomach, and duodenum
  • Increased appetite leading to significant weight gain
  • A latent diabetes mellitus often becomes manifest. Glucose intolerance is worsened in patients with preexisting diabetes.
  • Immunsuppressant action, particular if given together with other immunosuppressants such as ciclosporine. Bacterial, viral, and fungal disease may progress more easily and can become life-threatening. Fever as a warning symptom is often suppressed.
  • Psychiatric disturbances, including personality changes, irritability, euphoria, mania
  • Osteoporosis under long term treatment, pathologic fractures (e.g., hip)
  • Muscle atrophy, negative protein balance (catabolism)
  • Elevated liver enzymes, fatty liver degeneration (usually reversible)
  • Cushingoid (syndrome resembling hyperactive adrenal cortex with increase in adiposity, hypertension, bone demineralization, etc.)
  • Depression of the adrenal gland is usually seen, if more than 1.5 mg daily are given for more than three weeks to a month.
  • Hypertension, fluid and sodium retention, edema, worsening of heart insufficiency (due to mineral corticoid activity)
  • Dependence with withdrawal syndrome is frequently seen.
  • Increased intraocular pressure, certain types of glaucoma, cataract (serious clouding of eye lenses)
  • Dermatologic: Acne, allergic dermatitis, dry scaly skin, ecchymoses and petechiae, erythema, impaired wound-healing, increased sweating, rash, striae, suppression of reactions to skin tests, thin fragile skin, thinning scalp hair, urticaria.
  • Allergic reactions (though infrequently): Anaphylactoid reaction, anaphylaxis, angioedema. (Highly unlikely, since dexamethasone is given to prevent anaphylactoid reactions.)

Other side-effects have been noted. Ask your doctor, if you notice them and if they are more than mild.

Read more at Wikipedia.org


[List your site here Free!]


Direct application of dexamethasone for the treatment of chronic eustachian tube dysfunction - Original Article
From Ear, Nose & Throat Journal, 1/1/03 by Herbert Silverstein

Abstract

We undertook a prospective study to determine the safety and effectiveness of the direct administration of a steroid to the eustachian tube via the Silverstein Micro Wick in 11 patients with chronic eustachian tube dysfunction, including two who had Samter's triad. All patients had previously been treated with medical therapy and surgical middle ear ventilation without resolution. The MicroWick was placed directly in the eustachian tube orifice through a pressure-equalization tube. Patients received 3 drops of dexamethasone 4 mg/ml three times a day. The drops were discontinued after 4 weeks, and the MicroWick and ventilation tube were removed after 3 months. At study's end, eight patients (72.7%) reported subjective improvement in terms of a reduction in aural pressure and fullness. Audiometric testing demonstrated a 55% reduction in the mean air-bone gap and a 3% increase in the mean speech discrimination score. Bone pure-tone averages remained stable. Tympanometry showed that five patients (45.5%) converte d from type B or C tympanograms to type A. Four patients (36.4%) had persistent perforations. Both patients with Samter's triad improved with therapy. These preliminary results suggest that direct dexamethasone administration to the eustachian tube is safe and effective for the treatment of chronic eustachian tube dysfunction. Long-term studies to confirm these findings are under way.

Introduction

Chronic eustachian tube dysfunction is frequently encountered by primary care physicians and otolaryngologists. This condition can be difficult to treat, particularly in adults who have a lifelong history of eustachian tube dysfunction. Bluestone and Doyle attribute three major functions to the eustachian tube: ventilation, clearance, and protection of the middle ear. (1) The middle ear tends to lose gas by diffusion into the surrounding mucosal circulation. The normal eustachian tube serves to admit gas in order to equalize middle ear pressure with that of the surrounding environment. Eustachian tube dysfunction can result in negative middle ear pressure and precipitate associated signs and symptoms. These signs and symptoms include conductive hearing loss, tinnitus, otalgia, vertigo, tympanic membrane atelectasis, cholesteatoma formation, and recurrent otitis media. (2-4) Many authors have concluded that eustachian tube dysfunction is the most important precipitating pathology in the development of otitis m edia. (2-6)

Historically, the single most effective treatment for negative middle ear pressure and serous otitis media has been the insertion of a ventilation tube into the tympanic membrane. (2) More recently, laser-assisted tympanostomy has been used to create an opening in the tympanic membrane for 3 to 4 weeks. (7,8) This procedure obviates the need for placing a ventilation tube in half of all affected children and approximately 80% of affected adults. However, no method has been proven effective that involves directly treating eustachian tube pathology when conventional therapy has failed. Several techniques have been proposed over the years. For example, in 1985, Jansen described a posterior tuboplasty procedure in which the osseous portion of the eustachian tube is enlarged. (9) Within a few years, variations of this technique were reported by Charachon et al (10) and Zini. (11) Poe and Kujawski recently described an endoscopic laser-assisted technique that was designed to improve the proximal opening of the nas opharyngeal eustachian tube orifice. (12)

Much of eustachian tube pathology relates to mucosal disease and associated hypertrophy, which can be precipitated by allergic and reactive disease. We have developed a technique for treating chronic eustachian tube dysfunction that involves a transtympanic approach to the eustachian tube. In our method, a patient self-instills a topical steroid via the Micro Wick device (ET MicroWick) over an extended period of time. We propose that direct steroid application via the ET Micro Wick might serve to reduce mucosal hypertrophy and improve eustachian tube function.

Patients and methods

All patients at our tertiary otologic referral center who had chronic eustachian tube dysfunction were offered treatment with the ET Micro Wick provided that they met three selection criteria: (1) their symptoms were consistent with eustachian tube dysfunction (e.g., hearing loss and aural fullness), (2) they had previously undergone both medical therapy and at least one middle ear ventilation procedure, and (3) findings on tympanometry or clinical examination suggested that their middle ear pressure was abnormal. Eleven patients, aged 34 to 90 years (mean: 63), qualified for the study. Two of these patients had eustachian tube dysfunction associated with Samter's triad (bronchial asthma, nasal polyps, and aspirin sensitivity).

Examination of the nasopharynx was performed on all patients to rule out an obstructing mass. Audiograms and impedance tympanometry were obtained on all patients prior to treatment. All patients were monitored with serial testing during and after the completion of therapy.

The essentials of our procedure are as follows (figure 1). The ear is anesthetized, and then a laser tympanotomy or vertical myringotomy is made over the protympanum. The middle ear and eustachian tube are examined with a 30[degrees] otoendoscope and an operating microscope to determine if there is an obstructing membrane over the eustachian tube orifice. If such a membrane is present, a small pick is used to clear it. A ventilation tube is inserted into the tympanostomy opening; this should allow for the direct visualization of the eustachian tube through the microscope when the tube is directed properly. The MicroWick is then inserted through the ventilation tube toward the eustachian tube orifice until resistance is met. Then the dexamethasone 4 mg/ml is introduced into the MicroWick.

Patients are instructed to self-administer the medication into the ear while lying down with the treated ear facing upward; they are to remain lying for 15 minutes. The dexamethasone solution is administered three times a day for 4 weeks. Patients concurrently self-administer an antibiotic solution, 2 drops at bedtime, as prophylaxis against otitis externa. At approximately 3 months, the MicroWick and tube are removed, and middle ear otoendoscopy can be repeated to visually assess the eustachian tube response. Then the tympanic membrane is allowed to close.

Results

The 11 patients were treated over a 16-month period. The average follow-up was 7.2 months. The data on one patient spans only the first 2 months postoperatively because this patient had severe otitis media and developed a profound sensorineural hearing loss; there was no evidence to suggest any association between the infection and the MicroWick steroid treatment because the infection occurred 2 months after the wick had been removed.

Air threshold levels were measured preoperatively, postoperatively, and during follow-up (table 1). (We list the means for both the four-frequency pure-tone average [PTA] and the data at each individual frequency because of the variability in the air-bone gap across frequencies.) The mean preoperative PTA was 40 dB; at the most recent follow-up, the mean PTA had improved to 34 dB. The bone threshold PTA was 28 dB preoperatively and 27 dB postoperatively, and no patient experienced sensorineural hearing loss. The mean air-bone gap decreased from 11 to 5 dB with treatment; the 6-dB improvement corresponds to a mean air-bone gap closure of 55% (table 2). This change was not statistically significant. The mean speech discrimination score rose from 94% preoperatively to 97% postoperatively.

Preoperatively, three patients (27.3%) had type A tympanograms, six (54.5%) had type B tympanograms, and two (18.2%) had type C tympanograms. After a mean postoperative follow-up of 8 months in this group, four of the eight who had either a type B or C tympanogram converted to type A, including both patients who had Samter's triad. Four patients (36.4%) had persistent perforations for at least 3 months postoperatively, and three of them subsequently underwent successful fat myringoplasty under local anesthesia in the office; the fourth patient was satisfied with her hearing results, and she chose not to have the perforation patched. Aural fullness or pressure resolved completely in eight patients (72.7%).

Discussion

The role of eustachian tube dysfunction in the development of chronic otitis media with effusion and conductive hearing loss is widely recognized. (1,4,5) However, treatment options remain limited. Middle ear aeration via tympanotomy and tube insertion has been the management of choice for chronic effusions that do not respond to medical therapy. (2) Complications of long-term ventilation tube placement include otorrhea, persistent tympanic membrane perforations, and the inconvenience of adhering to dry-ear precautions. Unfortunately, the underlying patho-physiology usually leads to a recurrence of symptoms when the tube is removed and the tympanic membrane is allowed to heal. (13,14)

The causes of eustachian tube obstruction in adults are varied, but one of the principal pathways involves mucosal edema. (4) The ability of steroids to inhibit inflammation and reduce edema has led to their use in the treatment of chronic serous otitis media. Topical steroids have been shown to shorten the duration of acute serous otitis media, and oral prednisone has been shown to be effective in treating acute serous otitis media, although the degree of its long-term efficacy is unclear. (15)

The incidence of persistent perforations in our study (36.4%) is relatively high, compared with the incidence observed following other applications of the MicroWick (e.g., gentamicin perfusion of the inner ear). It is likely that the steroid solution inhibits tympanic membrane healing by inducing atrophy around the rim of the tympanotomy. This idea is supported by the surgical findings at the time of myringoplasty (figure 2). The membranes were found to be avascular and fragile. However, fat myringoplasty was successful in all cases.

Although the hearing improvement on audiometry was not statistically significant in this study, our overall results were encouraging. Considering that the patients enrolled in our study all had chronic, recurrent disease (including the two who had Samter's triad), the positive trend in hearing ability, the improvement reflected in tympanometry, and the alleviation of aural symptoms suggest that this is an effective treatment. Long-term studies to confirm our findings are under way.

In conclusion, eustachian tube dysfunction remains a common and potentially serious condition for which few treatment options exist. We have presented the results of a new technique that is aimed at reducing mucosal edema in the eustachian tube and restoring tubal patency. The MicroWick is a simple drug delivery system that can specifically target various structures in the middle and inner ear. The ET Micro Wick procedure with dexamethasone perfusion appears to be well tolerated, as side effects were minimal.

Finally, the causes of eustachian tube dysfunction are multifactorial; they include mucosal edema, muscular dysfunction, cartilage collapse, and obstruction by structures in the nasopharynx. As improvements continue in diagnostic techniques for identifying the precise underlying pathophysiology in each individual case, patient selection for this treatment will become more refined.

References

(1.) Bluestone CD, Doyle WJ. Anatomy and physiology of eustachian tube and middle ear related to otitis media. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1988;81(5 Pt 2):997-1003.

(2.) Sade J, Ar A. Middle ear and auditory tube: Middle ear clearance, gas exchange, and pressure regulation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;l16:499-524.

(3.) Bluestone CD, Klein JO. Otitis Media in Infants and Children. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1995:5-38.

(4.) Tos M. The intraluminal obstructive pathogenic concept of eustachian tube in secretory otitis media. In: Sade J, ed. Basic Aspects of the Eustachian Tube and Middle Ear Diseases. Amsterdam: Kugler and Ghedini, 1991:327-33.

(5.) Bluestone CD, Paradise JL, Beery QC. Physiology of the eustachian tube in the pathogenesis and management of middle ear effusions. Laryngoscope 1972;82:1654-70.

(6.) Cantekin EI, Bluestone CD, Parkin LP. Eustachian tube ventilatory function in children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1976;85(2 Suppl 25 Pt 2):171-7.

(7.) Silverstein H, Jackson LE, Rosenberg SI, Conlon WS. Pediatric laser-assisted tympanostomy. Laryngoscope 2001 ;111:905-6.

(8.) Silverstein H, Rosenberg SI, Poe D, Jackson LE, eds. Minimally Invasive Otologic Surgery. Clifton Park, N.Y.: Delmar Learning, 2002.

(9.) Jansen CW. Functional repair of the eustachian tube. Am J Otol 1985;6:23 1-2.

(10.) Charachon R, Gratacap B, Lerat M. [Surgery of the bony eustachian tube and tubal isthmus]. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 1986;107:45-8.

(11.) Zini C. Osseous tube surgery. Principles and techniques. Vidiotology 1988;1:6-13.

(12.) Poe D, Kujawski O. Endoscopic diagnosis and surgery of eustachian tube dysfunction. In: Silverstein H, Rosenberg SI, Poe D, Jackaon LE, eds. Minimally Invasive Otologic Surgery. Clifton Park, N.Y.: Delmar Learning, 2002.

(13.) Schuknecht HF, Zaytoun GM, Moon CN, Jr. Adult-onset fluid in the tympanomastoid compartment. Diagnosis and management. Arch Otolaryngol 1982;108:759-65.

(14.) Lamp CB, Jr. Chronic secretory otitis media: Etiologic factors and pathologic mechanisms. Laryngoscope 1973;83:276-91.

(15.) Butler CC, van Der Voort JH. Steroids for otitis media with effusion. A systematic review. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001; 155:641-7.

COPYRIGHT 2003 Medquest Communications, LLC
COPYRIGHT 2003 Gale Group

Return to Dexamethasone
Home Contact Resources Exchange Links ebay