Diminazene
Find information on thousands of medical conditions and prescription drugs.

Diminazene

Diminazene is a di-amidine with sum formula: C14H15N7 and Molecular weight: 281.3 g/mole also known as 4,4'-(1-Triazene–1,3–diyl)bis(benzenecarboximidamide). It binds DNA and RNA and is the acting component of diminazene aceturate drugs (commercialized as Azidin, Berenil, Ganasag or Pirocide) directed, e.g., against Trypanosomiasis.

Home
Diseases
Medicines
A
B
C
D
Dacarbazine
Dactinomycin
Dalmane
Danazol
Dantrolene
Dapoxetine
Dapsone
Daptomycin
Daraprim
Darvocet
Darvon
Daunorubicin
Daunorubicin
Daypro
DDAVP
Deca-Durabolin
Deferoxamine
Delsym
Demeclocycline
Demeclocycline
Demerol
Demulen
Denatonium
Depakene
Depakote
Depo-Provera
Desferal
Desflurane
Desipramine
Desmopressin
Desogen
Desogestrel
Desonide
Desoxyn
Desyrel
Detrol
Dexacort
Dexamethasone
Dexamfetamine
Dexedrine
Dexpanthenol
Dextran
Dextromethorphan
Dextromoramide
Dextropropoxyphene
Dextrorphan
Diabeta
Diacerein
Diacetolol
Dial
Diamox
Diazepam
Diazoxide
Dibenzepin
Diclofenac
Diclohexal
Didanosine
Dieldrin
Diethylcarbamazine
Diethylstilbestrol
Diethyltoluamide
Differin
Diflucan
Diflunisal
Digitoxin
Digoxin
Dihydrocodeine
Dihydroergotamine
Dihydrotachysterol
Dilantin
Dilaudid
Diltahexal
Diltiazem
Dimenhydrinate
Dimercaprol
Dimetapp
Dimethyl sulfoxide
Dimethyltryptamine
Dimetridazole
Diminazene
Diovan
Dioxybenzone
Diphenhydramine
Diphenoxylate
Dipipanone
Dipivefrine
Diprivan
Diprolene
Diproteverine
Dipyridamole
Disulfiram
Disulfiram
Dizocilpine
Dobutamine
Docetaxel
Docusate sodium
Dofetilide
Dolasetron
Dolobid
Dolophine
Domperidone
Donepezil
Dopamine
Dopram
Doral
Doramectin
Doriden
Dornase alfa
Doryx
Dostinex
Doxapram
Doxazosin
Doxepin
Doxil
Doxil
Doxorubicin
Doxy
Doxycycline
Doxyhexal
Doxylamine
Drisdol
Drixoral
Dronabinol
Droperidol
Drospirenone
Duloxetine
Durabolin
Duragesic
Duraphyl
Duraquin
Dutasteride
Dv
Dyclonine
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z

Read more at Wikipedia.org


[List your site here Free!]


distribution of tsetse (diptera: Glossinidae) and bovine trypanosomosis in the matutuine district, Maputo Province, Mozambique, The
From Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, The, 9/1/00 by Sigauque, I

ABSTRACT

SIGAUQUE, L, VAN DEN BOSSCHE, P., MOIANA, M., JAMAL, S. & NEVES, L. 2000. The distribution of tsetse (Diptera: Glossinidae) and bovine trypanosomosis in the Matutuine District, Maputo Province, Mozambique. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 67:167-172

A tsetse and bovine trypanosomosis survey was conducted during 1998 and 1999 in the Matutuine District of Maputo Province (Mozambique). A total of 59 Glossina brevipalpis and 17 Glossina austeni were captured throughout the district. Survey results suggest that Glossina brevipalpis is mainly concentrated in dense vegetation along the Maputo River and in the wetlands east of the river. G. austeni, on the other hand, was captured mainly in dense thickets in drier areas. Both tsetse species are suspected to be vectors of bovine trypanosomosis. Bovine trypanosomosis (75,5 % Trypanosoma congolense) was diagnosed in 53 animals (13,9 %) from seven sampling sites distributed throughout the district. The prevalence of cattle with anti-trypanosomal antibodies was high (29,9 %).The incidence of trypanosomal infections in sentinel cattle was also high. The widespread distribution of bovine trypanosomosis and the high prevalence of infection are likely to have a significant impact on cattle production and, hence, the cattle restocking exercise in the district.

Keywords: Bovine trypanosomosis, Diptera: Glossinidae, Glossina austeni, Glossina brevipalpis,

Matutuine District, Mozambique, tsetse, Trypanosoma congolense

INTRODUCTION

After 20 years of civil war, updated information on the distribution and density of tsetse in Mozambique is not available. Such information is of major importance in areas where cattle are present or where cattle are likely to be re-introduced. The Matutuine District, is situated in the southern part of the country in Maputo Province. Bovine trypansomosis was first reported in 1908.The distribution of tsetse in the District was first established in the late 1930s. In 1982, a tsetse survey revealed the presence of Glossina austeni and Glossina brevipalpis near the Maputo river and the Maputo Game Reserve as well as in Changalene (Jamal, Moiana & Sigauque, in press). In the 1950s, bovine trypanosomosis was controlled using bush clearing and game destruction but control opertions ceased in the late 1960s (Jamal, Moiana & Sigauque, in press). Before the civil war started in 1985, c. 60000 head of cattle were present in the district. The civil war reduced the cattle density to c. 600 animals. Currently, the district contains approximately 2 000 head of cattle, c. 6 % of the total cattle population in the Maputo Province. It has been selected as one of the zones where restocking will take place (DINAP 1998). To update the scanty information on tsetse and trypanosomosis in southern Mozambique, a tsetse and trypanosomosis survey was conducted. Use was made of parasitological and serological diagnostic methods. Data from the survey were used to produce an updated map of the distribution of tsetse and bovine trypanosomosis in the district. The possible repercussions of the presence of tsetse and bovine trypanosomosis on the cattle restocking exercise are discussed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tsetse surveys and surveillance

Tsetse survey

A tsetse survey was carried out in November and December 1998. At least five epsilon traps (Hargrove & Langley 1990) were deployed, for five consecutive days, at 12 trapping sites distributed over the Matutuine District (Fig. 1). Traps were baited with acetone dispensed from 500 me brown glass bottles, its vapour diffusing through a 6 mm aperture in the lid resulting in an average dose of 500 mg/h, as well as with a mixture of 3-n-propylphenol/1-octen-3-op/4-- methylphenol (ratio of mixture: 1/4/8) contained in polyethylene sachet dispensers (150 pm thick, surface area 30 cm2) (Vale & Hall 1985). The bottle and sachet were placed in a pocket in each trap. The index of abundance of tsetse (IA) at each trapping site was calculated as the total number of tsetse captured per trap per day.

Tsetse surveillance

Between March 1999 and August 1999, eight odourbaited epsilon traps were used to monitor the tsetse population. Four traps were deployed in the Shipissice area and four in the Sadula area (Fig. 1). Traps were emptied at two weekly intervals.

Bovine trypanosomosis surveys and surveillance

Diagnostic tests

Parasitological and serological methods were used for diagnosis. Blood was collected from an ear vein into heparinized microhaematocrit centrifuge capillary tubes and onto glass slides as thick and thin blood smears. The capillary tubes were sealed with "Cristaseal" (Hawksley) and centrifuged immediately in a microhaematocrit centrifuge for 5 min at 9000 rpm. After centrifugation, the packed cell volume (PCV) was determined. Animals with a PCV

From most of the animals, blood contained in one heparinized microhaematocrit centrifuge capillary tube was extruded onto a filter paper (Whatman no. 4, Whatman*). Eluted blood spots were screened for the presence of trypanosomal antibodies using an indirect ELISA (Hopkins, Chitambo, Machila et aL 1998). A rigorous system of quality assurance was adopted. The Optical Density (OD) of each ELISAsample tested was expressed as a percentage (percentage positivity, PP) of the strong positive reference standard (Wright, Nilsson, Van Rooij, Lelenta & Jeggo 1993). A cut-off of 28 % positivity was used. At this cut-off, the assay had a sensitivity of 88,5% and a specificity of 99,0 %.

Trypanosomosis survey

In November and December 1998, a total of 380 adult cattle were examined at eight sampling sites (Fig. 1). Sampling was restricted to areas where cattle were present and attempts were made to distribute the sampling sites evenly over the district. A cross-sectional sampling method was applied. Sample sizes were calculated according to Cannon & Roe (1982).They depended on the total cattle population at a particular sampling site. Sample sizes were calculated to provide 95 % certainty of detecting at least one positive case at a prevalence of 5%.

Trypanosomosis surveillance

To estimate the level of challenge, two sentinel herds were established. The first herd of 39 head of adult cattle was located at Sadula Farm near Bela Vista (Fig. 1). The second herd of 31 adult animals was located at Shipissice near Catuane close to the border with South Africa (Fig. 1). All animals were kept under local village management and were sampled at two weekly intervals between March and August 1999. Only parasitological diagnostic methods were used (see above). A total of 12 samplings were conducted. Trypanosomal infections were treated with diminazene aceturate at the dosage rate of 7 mg/kg body mass for Trypanosoma brucei or 3,5 mg/kg body mass for T congolense and T vivax if the PCV was lower or equal to 20%. Parasitological 1y negative animals with a PCV lower or equal to 20 % were also treated with diminazene aceturate at the rate of 3,5 mg/kg body mass. For both sentinel herds, the cumulative proportion of cattle that was or had been infected with trypanosomes during the observation period was calculated.

RESULTS

Tsetse survey

A total of 59 G. brevipalpis (25 males and 34 females) and 17 G. austeni (5 males and 12 females) were captured during 330 trap days (Table 1). In most of the trapping sites only one tsetse species was captured (Fig. 1).

Tsetse surveillance

Between March and August 1999, six tsetse flies were captured. Glossina brevipalpis was captured in the Sadula area and G. austeni in the Shipissice area (Table 2).

Trypanosomosis survey

A total of 380 animals from eight sampling sites in the Matutuine District were sampled. Fifty-three trypanosomal infections (13,9%) were detected in animals from seven sampling sites (Table 3). The majority of the infections (75,5 %) was due to T congolense (Table 4).

Of the 361 blood spots collected, 108 (29,9%) had anti-trypan oso mal antibodies. The prevalence of cattle with anti-trypanosomal antibodies varied substantially between sampling sites (Table 3). It was highest in the herd sampled at Lima (86,1 %) and lowest in the herd sampled at Shipissice (2,4%).The correlation between the parasitological prevalence of trypanosomosis and the proportion of animals with anti-trypanosomal antibodies was significant (r == 0,74, P

The herd average PCV varied significantly between sampling sites (F= 12,0, P

Trypanosomosis surveillance

During the six months observation period, a total of 39 trypanosomal infections were detected in the sentinel cattle. They were mainly due to T congolense (73,0 %). Trypanosoma vivax was detected in 13,5 % of the cases. The remainder were mixed infections (T congolense and T viva and one T brucei infection. The trypanosome species prevalence did not differ much between the two sentinel herds.

Over the six months observation period, 43,6 % of the sentinel cattle at Shipissice and 48,4 % of the sentinel cattle at Sadula became infected with trypanosomes at least once (Fig. 2).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Distribution of tsetse

The survey results show that both G. austeni and G. brevipalpis are present in the Matutuine District of Maputo Province. Both tsetse species have been recorded in the district before (Potts 1954; Takken 1984). Moreover, the tsetse catches close to the Mozambique/South Africa border indicate that the Matutuine fly-belt is linked to the tsetse-belt in the KwaZulu-Natal Province of South Africa where both species are also present (Du Toit 1954; Kappmeier, Nevill & Bagnall 1998).These observations are in accordance with information on the historical distribution of tsetse in the distict (Jamal, Moiana & Sigauque, in press).

It is difficult to draw conclusions on the population densities of tsetse. Both tsetse species respond differently to the epsilon traps and the odour attractants used in the surveys (Vreysen, Khamis & Van der Vloedt 1996; Kappmeier & Nevill 1999a). However, survey results do suggest that G. brevipalpis is mainly concentrated in dense vegetation along the Maputo River and in the wetlands east of the river. G. austeni, on the other hand, was captured mainly in dense thickets in drier areas. This distribution is in accordance with the observed habitat preference of both species in KwaZulu-Natal (Du Toit 1947).

Prevalence and incidence of bovine trypanosomosis

Notwithstanding the differences in the distribution of both tsetse species, trypanosomal infections were detected in cattle from almost all survey areas. This indicates that both G. austeni and G. brevipalpis transmit the disease in the Matutuine District. This is in accordance with observations made in KwaZuluNatal where both G. austeni and G. brevipalpis are sources of infection for cattle (Kappmeier, Nevill & Bagnall 1998). The average prevalence of trypanosomal infections in cattle was high and differed significantly between sampling sites. It is not clear if this difference in prevalence reflects differences in challenge or different levels of trypanocidal drug use. The effective treatment of trypanosomal infections would, however, not prevent the development of anti-trypanosomal antibodies. Hence, areas where the parasitological prevalence of trypanosomosis is low because of the effective use of trypanocidal drug should have a high proportion of animals with antibodies. This is not the case. It is, therefore, likely that the differences in prevalence of trypanosomal infections do reflect differences in the level of challenge. Surveillance results from both sentinel herds clearly show that challenge can be very high. During the six months observation period, almost 50% of the sentinel animals became infected with pathogenic trypanosomes. As is the case in other countries in southern Africa, the dominant trypanosome species was T congolense (Van den Bossche, Shumba & Makhambera 2000). The incidence of trypanosomal infections was highest during the first three months (March to May) of the observation period indicating that tsetse challenge is probably highest during the rainy season.

Expected socio-economic impact of bovine trypanosomosis

The results emanating from this survey have important implications. The widespread distribution of bovine trypanosomosis and the high prevalence of infection in some of the areas are likely to affect cattle production. Data on the productivity of indigenous cattle breeds kept in tsetse-infested areas in other countries in southern Africa show that, even if trypanosomosis-related mortality is reduced by using curative trypanocidal drugs, calving rates are usually low as a result of the disease (Doran & Van den Bossche, in press). This may have important repercussions on herd growth and, hence, the effectiveness of the cattle restocking exercise in the Matutuine District.

Options for the control of bovine trypanosomosis

Except for the rather erratic use of trypanocides, no trypanosomosis control measures are in place in the district. Although no data are available on the productivity of cattle in the district, it is likely that under the observed level of challenge optimal productivity will only be achieved by applying strict treatment regimes with chemotherapeutic, but especially, chemoprophylactic drugs (Boyt 1979). Such an approach will only be effective if resistance in trypanosomes to the trypanocidal drugs is absent. Tsetse control, if sustained, would provide the ultimate solution to the bovine trypanosomosis problem. Recently, odourbaited targets have been developed for G. austeni and G. brevipalpis in South Africa (Kappmeier & Nevill 1 999b). The transboundary nature of the tsetse problem should be taken into account when planning for such an operation.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This survey was conducted by the Diraccao Nacional de Pecuaria. The results presented are part of a thesis, submitted by the first author, as partial requirement for an M.Sc degree at the University of Zimbabwe. Dr W. Shumba (RTTCP, Harare) assisted with the analysis of the ELISA samples. Mr O.Tembe and Mr Mendes are acknowledged for their assistance in the field, and Mrs N. Ngoque and Mr B. Jeque for laboratory assistance. The work was funded by the Food and Agricultural Organization (TCP/MOZ/4555) and the 6th European Development fund through the Regional Tsetse and Trypanosomosis Control Programme (Accounting numbers 6 ACP RPR 468 and 7 ACP MOZ 001).

REFERENCES

BOYT, W.R 1979.Trypanosomiasis in Zimbabwe Rhodesia. Rhodesian Veterinary Journal, 10:54-63.

CANNON, R.M. & ROE, R.T 1982. Livestock disease surveys. A field manual for Veterinarians. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

DINAP 1998. Annual Report 1998. Maputo, Diraccdo Nacional de Pecuaria.

DORAN, M. & VAN DEN BOSSCHE, R 2000. An assessment of the socio-economic impact of bovine trypanosomosis and its control in the southern African region. Proceedings of the 25P meeting of the International Scientific Council for Trypanosomiasis Research and Control, 1999. In press.

DU TOIT, R. 1947. The problems presented by the control of tsetse flies in the Union of South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 43:262-265.

DU TOIT, R. 1954. Trypanosomiasis in Zululand and the control of tsetse flies by chemical means. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 26:317-387.

HARGROVE, J.W. & LANGLEY, RA. 1990. Sterilizing tsetse (Diptera, Glossinidae) in the field-a successful trial. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 80:397-403.

HOPKINS, J.S., CHITAMBO, H., MACHILA, N., LUCKINS, A.G., RAE, RF., VAN DEN BOSSCHE, R & EISLER, M.C. 1998. Adaptation and validation of the antibody trapping ELISA using dried blood spots on filter paper, for epidemiological surveys of tsetse transmitted trypanosomosis in cattle. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 37:91-99.

JAMAL, S., MOIANA, M. & SIGAUQUE, 1. 2000. Historical review and results of 1998 surveys on tsetse distribution and trypanosomosis prevalence in Matutuine District in Southern Mozambique. Proceedings of the 2611 meeting of the International Scientific Council for Trypanosomiasis Research and Control, 1999. In press.

KAPPMEIER, K., NEVILL, E.M. & BAGNALL, R.J. 1998. Review of tsetse flies and trypanosomosis in South Africa. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 65:195-203.

KAPPMEIER, K. & NEVILL, E.M. 1999a. Evaluation of conventional odour attractants for Glossina brevipalpis and Glossina austeni (Diptera: Glossinidae) in South Africa. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 66:307-316.

KAPPMEIER, K. & NEVILL, E.M. 1999b. Evaluation of a proposed odour-baited target to control the tsetse flies Glossina brevipalpis and Glossina austeni (Diptera: Glossinidae) in South Africa. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 66:327-332.

POTTS, W. H. 1954. Distribution of tsetse species in Africa. London: Directorate of Colonial Surveys.

TAKKEN, W. 1984. Studies on the biconical trap as a sampling device for tsetse (Diptera: Glossinidae) in Mozambique. Insect Science and its Application, 5:357-361.

VALE, G.A. & HALL, D.R. 1985. The role of 1-octen-3-oV, acetone and carbon dioxide to improve baits for tsetse flies. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 75:219-231.

VAN DEN BOSSCHE, P, SHUMBA, W. & MAKHAMBERA, P. 2000. The distribution and epidemiology of bovine trypanosomosis in Malawi. Veterinary Parasitology, 88:163-176.

VREYSEN, M.J.B., KHAMIS, LS. & VAN DER VLOEDT, A.M.V. 1996. Evaluation of sticky panels to monitor populations of Glossina austeni (Diptera: Glossinidae) on Uguya island of Zanzibar. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 86:289-296.

WRIGHT, RF., NILSSON, E., VAN ROOIJ, E.M.A., LELENTA, M. & JEGGO, M.H. 1993. Standardisation and validation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay techniques for the detection of antibody in infectious disease diagnosis. Revue Scientifique technique de l'office International des Epizooties, 12: 435-450.

I. SIGAUQUE', P VAN DEN BOSSCHE2, M. MOIANA', S. JAMALI and L. NEVES3

1 Diraccao Nacional de Pecuaria, Caixa Postal 1406, Maputo, Mozambique

2 Regional Tsetse and Trypanosomiasis Control Programme (RTTCP), P.O. Box A560, Harare, Zimbabwe

3 Faculdade de Veterinaria, Caixa Postal 257, Maputo, Mozambique

Accepted for publication 31 May 2000-Editor

Copyright Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute Sep 2000
Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights Reserved

Return to Diminazene
Home Contact Resources Exchange Links ebay