Methadone chemical structure
Find information on thousands of medical conditions and prescription drugs.

Dolophine

Methadone is a synthetic opioid analgesic synthesized in 1937 by German scientists Max Bockmühl and Gustav Ehrhart at IG Farben (Hoechst-Am-Main) who were searching for an analgesic that would be easier to use during surgery and also have low addiction potential. Methadone is a Schedule II drug under the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. more...

Home
Diseases
Medicines
A
B
C
D
Dacarbazine
Dactinomycin
Dalmane
Danazol
Dantrolene
Dapoxetine
Dapsone
Daptomycin
Daraprim
Darvocet
Darvon
Daunorubicin
Daunorubicin
Daypro
DDAVP
Deca-Durabolin
Deferoxamine
Delsym
Demeclocycline
Demeclocycline
Demerol
Demulen
Denatonium
Depakene
Depakote
Depo-Provera
Desferal
Desflurane
Desipramine
Desmopressin
Desogen
Desogestrel
Desonide
Desoxyn
Desyrel
Detrol
Dexacort
Dexamethasone
Dexamfetamine
Dexedrine
Dexpanthenol
Dextran
Dextromethorphan
Dextromoramide
Dextropropoxyphene
Dextrorphan
Diabeta
Diacerein
Diacetolol
Dial
Diamox
Diazepam
Diazoxide
Dibenzepin
Diclofenac
Diclohexal
Didanosine
Dieldrin
Diethylcarbamazine
Diethylstilbestrol
Diethyltoluamide
Differin
Diflucan
Diflunisal
Digitoxin
Digoxin
Dihydrocodeine
Dihydroergotamine
Dihydrotachysterol
Dilantin
Dilaudid
Diltahexal
Diltiazem
Dimenhydrinate
Dimercaprol
Dimetapp
Dimethyl sulfoxide
Dimethyltryptamine
Dimetridazole
Diminazene
Diovan
Dioxybenzone
Diphenhydramine
Diphenoxylate
Dipipanone
Dipivefrine
Diprivan
Diprolene
Diproteverine
Dipyridamole
Disulfiram
Disulfiram
Dizocilpine
Dobutamine
Docetaxel
Docusate sodium
Dofetilide
Dolasetron
Dolobid
Dolophine
Domperidone
Donepezil
Dopamine
Dopram
Doral
Doramectin
Doriden
Dornase alfa
Doryx
Dostinex
Doxapram
Doxazosin
Doxepin
Doxil
Doxil
Doxorubicin
Doxy
Doxycycline
Doxyhexal
Doxylamine
Drisdol
Drixoral
Dronabinol
Droperidol
Drospirenone
Duloxetine
Durabolin
Duragesic
Duraphyl
Duraquin
Dutasteride
Dv
Dyclonine
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z

On September 11, 1941 Bockmühl and Ehrhart filed an application for a patent for a synthetic substance they called Hoechst 10820 or polamidon and whose structure had no relation to morphine or the opioid alkaloids (Bockmühl and Ehrhart, 1949). Although chemically unlike morphine or heroin, methadone also acts on the opioid receptors and thus produces many of the same effects. Chemically, methadone is the simplest of the opioids.

Methadone was introduced into the United States in 1947 by Eli Lilly and Company as an analgesic (They gave it the trade name Dolophine® which is now registered to Roxane Laboratories). Since then, it has been best known for its use in treating narcotic addiction, though it is also used in managing chronic pain due to its long duration of action and very low cost. In late 2004, the cost of a one month supply of methadone is 20 USD, as compared to an equivalent analgesic amount of Demerol at 120 USD. The old name Dolophine comes from the German Dolphium. The name derives from the Latin "dolor" (pain).

Methadone (as Dolophine) was first manufactured in the USA by Mallinckrodt pharmaceuticals, a St. Louis-based subsidiary of the Tyco International corporation. Mallinckrodt held the patent up until the early 1990s. Today a number of pharmaceutical companies produce and distribute methadone. However, the major producer remains Mallinckrodt. Mallinckrodt sells bulk methadone to most of the producers of generic preparations and also distributes its own brand name product in the form of tablets, dispersable tablets and oral concentrate under the name "Methadose" in the United States. Generally, one will only hear "dolophine" used by older addicts who used the product in the 1960's and 1970's. Medical professionals who believe that dolophine is the generic name for methadone, when actually it is the reverse, may also use the old brand name.

Methadone has a slow metabolism and very high lipid solubility making it longer lasting than morphine-based drugs. Methadone has a typical half life of 24-48 hours, permitting the administration only once a day in heroin detoxification and maintenance programs. The most common mode of delivery at a Methadone clinic is in an oral solution. Methadone is almost as effective when administered orally as by injection. Just like heroin, tolerance and dependence frequently develop. Current research in this area shows methadone has a unique affinity for the NMDA brain receptor. Some researchers propose that NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartic acid) may regulate psychic dependence and tolerance by exhibiting opioid antagonist-like activity. Withdrawal symptoms are generally less acutely severe than those of morphine and heroin at equivalent doses, but are significantly more prolonged. Considered generally effective in management of heroin addiction and harm reduction (reduction of HIV rates, etc...). At proper dosing, it reduces the appetite for heroin. However, some heroin addicts feel that it is actually harder to quit methadone than heroin itself. Treatment at a methadone maintenance clinic is intended to be for an indefinite duration, as the treatment is not curative.

Read more at Wikipedia.org


[List your site here Free!]


News Briefs - Hepatitis C care; primary HIV infection treatment; perinatal HIV treatment guidelines; protease inhibitor side effects; Trizivir approved;
From Research Initiative/Treatment Action!, 12/1/00

Guidelines for managing HIV and HCV co-infected patients.

As many as a third of HIV-infected individuals in the US are likely co-infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Recent guidelines are available online as part of a CME monograph at projectsinknowledge.com/programs.html. The report includes a discussion of clinical issues such as identifying patients requiring treatment, managing the challenges faced by co-infected patients, and optimally using highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) to treat HIV as well as interferon-alpha and ribavirin to treat HCV infection. Although many doctors still hesitate to treat HCV in HIV-infected patients, these guidelines emphasize the simultaneous use of combination therapies for HIV and HCV. Physicians are recommended to treat both viruses by staggering the initiation of treatments and carefully monitoring liver function.

Potential benefits of treating PHI.

Investigators from Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, in Boston, report that in HIV-infected patients successfully treated with HAART early in infection (i.e. during primary HIV infection, PHI) improved immune control is possible later on--even after discontinuation of therapy. Their study is published in the September 28 issue of Nature (407, p. 523, 2000). They measured HIV-specific cellular immune responses in patients who were effectively treated with HAART during the acute or early phases of HIV infection. When therapy was interrupted in 8 subjects, plasma viral load levels became detectable after 7 to 38 days. In 3 of these subjects, the viral load then dropped to less than 5000 copies/mL (varying from 500 to over 5000 copies/mL). Two were then able to stay off therapy after 7.4 and 8.7 months. The third elected to restart therapy after 91 days even though his viral load never exceeded 5000 copies/mL. After discontinuing therapy again, he has a viral load of 280 copies/mL at 5.4 months. The other 5 patients had to restart therapy, which was interrupted a second time. In all of these patients, viral load again peaked (but at a lower level than originally) and consequently fell to less than 5000 copies/mL without treatment. Two of these patients remained off therapy after 5.3 and 6.5 months, with viral loads less than 300 copies/mL. Virus-specific cytotoxic T cell responses increased significantly after both treatment interruptions and expanded to target more viral epitopes. Five of the 8 patients remained off therapy at the time of the report, an average of 2.7 years after initial infection. Viral loads remained below 500 copies/mL. The authors conclude that initiating HAART during acute or early HIV infection appears to confer a distinct benefit that may lead to periods of successful containment of viremia in the absence of HAART.

Perinatal guideline changes.

The Perinatal HIV Guidelines Working Group has updated the information in the Public Health Service Task Force Recommendations for the Use of Antiretroviral Drugs in Pregnant HIV-1 Infected Women for Maternal Health and Interventions to Reduce Perinatal HIV-1 Transmission in the United States. The primary changes include the addition of a new section titled, "Perinatal HIV-1 Transmission and Mode of Delivery" (pages 23-32), and the addition of information about lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra) in Table 2. The guidelines are available online at hivatis.org/trtgdlns.html# Perinatal. Single copies can be requested by phone (800.448.0440).

Carotid lesion risk with protease inhibitors.

Add another cardiovascular disease risk to the list of those associated with HAART. Italian researchers have found that HIV-infected individuals treated with protease inhibitors appear to have a much greater risk of carotid vessel lesions than uninfected controls and HIV-infected patients who are not on protease inhibitors. The study, published in AIDS (14, p. F123, 2000), looked at 102 HIV-infected patients: 55 had taken protease inhibitors and 47 were protease inhibitor naive. These individuals and 104 uninfected controls underwent ultrasonography of their epiaortic vessels. Acquired lesions of the vascular wall were seen in 52.7% of protease inhibitor experienced patients, while naive patients had a significantly lower lesion rate of 14.9%. No plaques were noted in the control group. Correlations were noted between carotid lesions and age, male sex, smoking, high triglyceride and cholesterol levels, and disease stage. However, the factor that most influenced the risk of vessel disease was protease inhibitor use. Further studies are needed to determine the mechanisms involved, and the practical clinical significance of these results must still be determined.

Trizivir approved.

On November 15, 2000, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Glaxo Wellcome's application to market Trizivir. Trizivir combines zidovudine (Retrovir), lamivudine (Epivir) and abacavir (Ziagen) into one tablet. The 3 components of Trizivir, all nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, have been previously approved for use in the United States. Trizivir is dosed twice daily, with or without food. For antiretroviral naive patients with baseline viral loads less than 100,000 copies/mL, Trizivir alone could constitute a complete antiretroviral regimen. However, for patients with higher viral loads, clinical study data indicate that a Trizivir-only regimen is more likely to result in viral rebound than a regimen containing a protease inhibitor. Since Trizivir contains abacavir, patients who take the new combination pill should be advised to watch for symptoms of abacavir hypersensitivity, which include nausea, rash, fatigue, fever and respiratory symptoms.

Nevirapine (Viramune) safety warning.

In a November 2000 letter to healthcare providers, Roxane Laboratories warned of potentially fatal hepatotoxicity associated with nevirapine (Viramune) therapy. The company urges intensive clinical and laboratory monitoring of patients during the first 12 weeks of nevirapine therapy; however, one third of serious hepatic events occurred after 3 months of treatment. Patients with nevirapine-related hepatotoxicity may complain of fatigue, malaise, anorexia and nausea with or without elevated transaminase levels. Physical examination may reveal jaundice and hepatomegaly. A diagnosis of hepatotoxicity should be considered for patients who present with nonspecific symptoms of hepatitis, even if liver function tests are normal. If clinical hepatotoxicity occurs, nevirapine should be permanently discontinued. The company also reiterated the importance of the 14 day lead-in for nevirapine therapy, in which the drug is administered only once a day at 200 mg, as a measure for reducing the incidence of serious drug-related skin rashes. Clinical trial data indicate that prednisone actually increases both the incidence and severity of nevirapine-related rashes when used with nevirapine and should therefore not be used. This new safety information has been added to the nevirapine package insert, which is available at viramune.com.

Enteric coated didanosine (Videx) approved.

On October 31, 2000, the FDA approved Bristol-Myers Squibb's application to market enteric coated didanosine (Videx) capsules. Since this new formulation is licensed for once daily administration, the FDA intends it for patients "whose management requires once-daily administration" of didanosine or an alternative didanosine formulation. However, the agency cautions that twice daily dosing with buffered didanosine tablets is preferred because there are only limited data to support the durability of virologic suppression with the new once-daily capsules. As with the tablets, enteric coated didanosine must be taken on an empty stomach, defined as 1 hour before or 2 hours after food. Side effects most commonly associated with this new formulation include loose stools, mild diarrhea, nausea and abdominal discomfort; however, the drug was generally well tolerated by volunteers in clinical trial.

Methadone decreases absorption of didanosine, stavudine.

A study published last summer in the Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (24, p. 241, 2000) indicates that the bioavailability of both didanosine and stavudine (Zerit) is decreased in HIV-infected patients on HAART who are also receiving methadone (Dolophine). Researchers from the University of Washington, Seattle, monitored serum levels of didanosine and stavudine in 17 patients who were on stable methadone therapy. In addition, they looked at absorption rates for didanosine and stavudine in 10 untreated individuals (as controls). Although there was a high degree of variability from patient to patient, methadone treatment on average reduced the areas under the curve by 63% for didanosine and by 25% for stavudine. In addition, peak drug concentrations were reduced by 66% for didanosine and 44% for stavudine. Levels of methadone appeared to be unaffected by either didanosine or stavudine. This study did not look at intracellular concentrations of the drugs, which is where didanosine and stavudine are active.

CD4 T cell response predicts clinical benefit.

Relying on data drawn from a prospective cohort study, French investigators report that the CD4 T cell response after 6 months of HAART predicts clinical outcome at 2 years regardless of virologic response. According to the investigators, the relationship between surrogate markers and clinical outcome among patients on HAART indicates that a CD4 T cell rise of at least 50 cells/[mm.sup.3] predicts a favorable clinical response at 24 months, even when virologic response is not optimal. Conversely, patients who have an optimal virologic response without the 50 cells/[mm.sup.3] increase have significantly higher rates of clinical disease progression. The researchers followed 2236 protease inhibitor naive patients for an average of 18 months.

COPYRIGHT 2000 The Center for AIDS: Hope & Remembrance Project
COPYRIGHT 2001 Gale Group

Return to Dolophine
Home Contact Resources Exchange Links ebay